Original source · versioned page text
Enclosure 6 - ESP Letter
Attached to the e-mail Operational Works Application OPW17/0016.
Attached to the e-mail Enclosure 5-Restoration Plan.eml, inside Operational Works Application OPW17/0016.
Ecological Service Professionals
Sustainable Science Solutions
Oyster Area Calculation Areal Surface Area Assumptions/Exclusions
Oyster Leases Tewantin are likely to be greater
given the area possibly occupied in
the lower estuary based on 5% of
the accommodation space within
historical oyster leases and proximity
to an indigenous shellfish midden
with 4 m deep oyster shells.
Several constraints on placement of
restoration structures due to various
external factors are outlined in the
Oyster Restoration Management
Plan
D) Current Surface area of all living oyster Current area of living leaf oyster Oyster beds and reefs typically form
2
extent of habitat identified in field bed = 4,050 m on soft substrates due to an
degraded living assessments, based on visual accumulation of shell. These dense
Oyster inspection, sediment probing Current area of degraded oyster aggregations can form substantial
beds/rubble/agg and handheld GPS location. habitat assessed within historical reefs >0.5m above the sediment
regation habitat harvest areas (note this is not surface. Fundamentally, with the
measured in The locations surveyed are equivalent to Oyster beds or exception of the leaf oyster bed,
Noosa River shown in appendix A and all reefs as oysters only occur at oyster aggregations growing on
within Historical but sites 16 and 17 are within low densities – Beck et al. 2009) rocks are different habitat to oyster
Oyster Leases the historical oyster lease (includes: Rock/Rubble bank – beds/reefs that grow on soft
2
areas. 15,892 m ; Coffee rock reef – sediments.
2 2
705 m ) = 16,597 m
Due to the nature of equipment
Total living oyster habitat (Figure 5), dredging would have
2 2
(4,050 m + 16,597 m ) = occurred over soft sediment areas
2
20,647 m rather than rock/rubble so may have
re-suspended sediments transported
by floods, creating a negative
feedback loop and affecting oyster
bed recovery/ oyster recruitment
(although it is not possible to
determine).
Natural rock surfaces are not
currently suitable for recruitment of
dense oyster aggregations or the
formation of dense beds/reefs due to
a lack of oyster settlement on
horizontal surfaces (due to algae
and fine sediment) (TNC & ESP
2015), low surface area:volume ratio
of rubble banks; lack of small spaces
within the rubble; and, modern
requirement of oysters to grow in a
narrow intertidal zone to escape
degraded conditions.
Does not include aggregations of
oysters on jetties or seawalls which
are functionally not equivalent to
natural oyster beds/reefs. Oyster
aggregations growing in a thin
veneer on vertical surfaces are
limited in the extent they can grow
away from the vertical surface due to
gravity and adhesion tension. This
limits the potential to become three-
dimensional habitats. Further they
are often found outside the fish
habitat area and do not currently
form part of the complex natural
estuarine habitat mosaic (refer to
living foreshore concept that may
make this possible).
E) Current Surface area of all identified Current areas of bedrock with Only a narrow intertidal band on
extent of oyster buried oyster bank and rubble intertidal oyster aggregations in hard rock surfaces is occupied by
aggregations on + bedrock in field assessments Lake Weyba (not equivalent to sparse oyster aggregations. This
bedrock/rubble Oyster beds of reefs – Beck et area represents all bedrock/rubble
measured in al. 2009) (includes: rock rubble so would have a considerable area
Lake Weyba banks with sparse oyster
28
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.