Original source · versioned page text
Enclosure 6 - ESP Letter
Attached to the e-mail Operational Works Application OPW17/0016.
Attached to the e-mail Enclosure 5-Restoration Plan.eml, inside Operational Works Application OPW17/0016.
Ecological Service Professionals
Sustainable Science Solutions
Recommendations
Historical reefs occurred in the Noosa Estuary and have likely declined due to a combination
of overharvesting, sedimentation (due to land use changes) and modifications to coastal
processes in the estuary from training the river mouth and urbanisation of the estuary. This
has resulted in a lack of suitable recruitment surfaces for oysters within the accommodation
space.
Based on available evidence from Florida, historical oyster reefs may have occupied
between 1 and 5% of the accommodation space available in an estuary. In the Noosa
Estuary the accommodation space for oysters would have been restricted to the lower
estuary, based on current ambient environmental conditions (particularly current salinity;
although these may have been historically different due to changes to the river mouth). The
area downstream of site 1 and in the Weyba Creek sub-catchment are consistent with having
water quality conditions suitable for oyster growth.
Current ambient environmental conditions are likely to support natural growth of oysters at
the majority of sites selected given there is sufficient oyster spat, although suitable substrate
that maximises overhanging spaces for natural recruitment needs to be supplemented to
protect spat from smothering from sediment. The easiest way to do this is to provide natural
oyster shell (the preferred settlement surface) at a vertical height above existing sediment,
suitable to allow oysters to grow without becoming smothered by sediment (both shifting
sand banks and accumulation of fine sediment).
We provide the following recommendations based on the current site assessment for each of
the restoration sites proposed:
Site Recommendation Reason
Site 1 Marginal keep pending successful oyster spat recruitment Marginal oyster habitat over deep fine sediment on
accreting bank. Sediment may not support
Monitor in accordance with restoration plan, particularly restoration units
recruitment and consider removing if oyster spat die
following settlement Oyster shell not found at site
Monitor sediment accumulation Likely to be at the upstream extent of accommodation
space based on limited oyster growth on nearby
jetties
Site 2 Keep as per plan – muddy sand bottom Oyster shell currently buried at site (historical oyster
habitat site), but marginal oyster habitat over fine
Monitor oyster recruitment & sediment accumulation on sediment based on current salinity measurements
restoration units
Seagrass observed in close proximity to proposed
Pre-construction seagrass survey required development footprint
Site 3 Keep as per plan – muddy sand bottom Oyster shell currently buried at site (historical oyster
habitat site), but marginal oyster habitat over fine
Monitor oyster recruitment & sediment accumulation on sediment based on current salinity measurements
restoration units
Seagrass observed in close proximity to proposed
Pre-construction seagrass survey required development footprint
Site 4 Keep as per plan – muddy sand bottom Optimal zone for oyster growth, within historical oyster
harvesting area
Monitor sediment accumulation on restoration units
Site 5 Keep as per plan – bare sandy bottom Optimal zone for oyster growth, within historical oyster
harvesting area
Site 6 Keep as per plan – bare sandy mud bottom Optimal zone for oyster growth, within historical oyster
harvesting area
Pre-construction seagrass survey required
Oyster shell currently buried at site (historical oyster
30
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.