Skip to the record
Every meeting, every word.

Original source · versioned page text

Ext to currency lot 324 (33 Douglas)- Planning Report

of 9

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

proposed rear boundary setback is consistent with developments both adjoining and in the area.

Where encroaching within the side boundary setback, privacy is maintained by ensuring windows
openings are screened. The proposed side boundary setback remains consistent with
developments both adjoining and in the area. Lots in the area are typically narrow which drastically
reduces usable building footprint. Council has granted numerous side boundary setback
relaxations. The proposal therefore complies with PO12 of the Medium Density Residential zone
code.

4.2 Site Cover

The Noosa Plan 2020 seeks a Site Cover of 40% for dwelling house in the Medium Density residential
zone. Noting that AO 10 of the Medium Density Residential zone code is an Acceptable Outcome. It
is considered the proposal complies with PO10 as described below.

As discussed in the Council Officers previous extension report, approval is sought for a ground floor
site cover of 49% and 1st floor site cover of 35%. This means the ground floor exceeds the require 40%
by 9% and the upper floor 5% less than the maximum allowed.

Based on the architectural design of the dwellings, the small exceedance of site cover is equivalent
to a gross floor area of 21m² on the ground floor which does not impact on any neighbouring
properties and is not readily seen from the surrounding area. The upper floor is 12m² less than allowed
which is the level that is mostly seen from the street and neighbouring properties.

Overall, the architecturally building design will not present bulky to the street or neighbouring
properties. In fact, dwelling houses adjoining to the east at 39, 41 and 43 Douglas Street and to the
rear at 50, 52 & 54 Ferguson Street all have site cover of near 50% demonstrating the proposal will
be consistent in bulk and scale to the adjoining and nearby properties and comply with PO 10 of the
Medium Density Residential zone code.

4.3 Plot ratio

While the Plot ratio does not comply with the Noosa Plan 2020 AO11 of the Medium Density
Residential zone code requirement of 0.4:1, the proposal is an architectural design that has
considered all aspects of amenity. The scale and bulk is compatible with surrounding development
as demonstrated above in section 4.2 of this report.

4.4 Roof Form

The Acceptable Outcome AO19 of the Medium Density Residential zone code seeks no roof terraces.

The dwellings include roof top terraces, however the siting of the terrace areas are an appropriate
response to address overlooking onto private open space areas of adjoining dwellings. The
proposed roof deck and lanai are situated towards the front of the site, such that there is likely to
be minimal overlooking to the adjoining properties (31 & 39 Douglas Street) with their outdoor open
space areas situated towards the rear. This proposal was assessed under the superseded planning
scheme and determined to comply with similar provisions to that of the current Medium Density


RG Strategic              Planning Report – Extension to currency period application – Lot 324        6
Log in to download the original file

Ext to currency lot 324 (33 Douglas)- Planning Report.pdf · 294 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.