Original source · versioned page text
Request Letter 16Oct15 (00020370)
Attached to the e-mail MCU14/0102.02 Change to existing approval.
In relation to the above definition, it is relevant to note the following:
- the changes proposed do not result in a substantially different
development, involve new uses or new land and will not result in any
changes to the built form;
- there were no referral agencies for the original application. If the
application were remade including the change, the proposed changes
would not require referrals to concurrence agencies;
- the original application was impact assessable. Only one objection was
recorded against the application. That objection was primarily
concerned with parking supply associated with the possible tyre and
mechanical shop. An additional parking space was provided as part of
the previous request to change (adjacent to tenancy 4). The changes
would not likely cause a person to object; and
- the proposed amendments do not involve prohibited development.
For these reasons it is considered that the proposed changes constitute a
Permissible Change to the approved development. On this basis it is considered
that the request can be dealt with pursuant to sections 369 – 377 of SPA. We
look forward to Council’s decision on this request.
Please do not hesitate to contact the writer on 5443 5566 should you have any
queries.
Yours faithfully
DFS Group
Peter Folker
Director
Att: Attachments A & B
cc: Empirica Developments Pty Ltd
October 2015 Empirica Developments Pty Ltd – Permissible Change Request Page 4
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.