Original source · versioned page text
2015-11-10 - P&O Agenda - Item 7, Attach 3 - History of Aquatic Restoration and Management Options for Noosa Estuary and Lakes
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
10
Table 3 Expert evaluation of restoration and management options for Noosa Estuary. The predicted consequence for a range of indictors is illustrated with arrows. The direction of the arrow indicates
either a predicted increase or decrease, and the relative size of the arrow provides a relative measure of the extent of the change likely as a result of each option (i.e., a larger arrow means a relatively
larger expected impact for that indicator). Also presented for each option are associated ancillary benefits, key uncertainties, an estimate of cost, and potential risks to success of the option.
Option Key actions Consequence for chosen indicators Other benefits Key uncertainties Cost Pre-mortem
estimate
Prawns Bream Whiting Mullet Birds Yabbies Crabs Biodiver
sity
Restoration Restore seagrass Increased fisheries Negative sentiment $5k per Community backlash and
of seagrass habitat through productivity from community who boat lack of support
improved control Increased availability want “clean” sandy mooring Vessels anchoring rather
and redesign (e.g.,
swing moorings) of
of habitat
Carbon
beaches rather than
seagrass
than using available
seagrass friendly
boat moorings *# sequestration moorings
Improved
management of
boat mooring areas
Oyster reef Create oyster reefs Improved water Possible disease $100K per No community support
restoration initially in Weyba quality transmission year or community backlash
Creek and Lake Sediment Natural recruitment initially for Increased oyster disease
Weyba stabilisation rates 5 year transmission
Citizen engagement
Increased fishing
Survival of oysters
Design of reefs
pilot then
ongoing
Increased E. coli
No impact on the
* aggregation Future magnitude of receiving environment
Enhancing existing water quality Loss of other habitats
mangrove and improvements
seagrass habitat
Living Replace hardened Increased public Engineering viability $1000+ Exacerbate erosion in
shorelines shoreline protection awareness and Public support through some areas
with structures that ownership shoreline stewardship Community backlash
incorporate Erosion protection Inability to manage
mangroves and
oyster reefs
Improved natural
aesthetics
marine plants due to
legislative implications
Improve biological * Atonement for past
connectivity and actions
extent of habitat
mosaic between
Noosa and Tewantin
Provide Sub-tidal reef Oysters recruiting Engineering $100k+ Navigation hazards
habitat/hard structures in the naturally and complexities / Fish attraction not
substrate
stepping
main channel
between Noosa and
associated benefits
Increased
modified
hydrodynamics
production
Invasion by exotic
stones Tewantin * recruitment of some Meta-population species
Improve biological fisheries species dynamics Suffocate action
connectivity Fish aggregation Size and spacing of Reduction in soft
– Positive effect on indicator species * shorebirds (e.g. migratory waders, oystercatchers etc.); # raptors; ^ seabirds; § consequence not able to be assessed due to a
– Negative effect on indicator species lack of specificity about the actions to be taken
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.