Council archive · source document
Slope Stability Report · EXE22/0013
Original PDF page 9, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
The potential implications for the associated risk level are outlined within the table below:‐
Risk Level Implications
VH (Very High Risk) Unacceptable without treatment. Extensive detailed investigation and
research, planning and implementation of treatment options essential to
reduce risk to Low; may be too expensive and not practical. Work likely to cost
more than the value of the property.
H (High Risk) Unacceptable without treatment. Detailed investigation, planning and
implementation of treatment options required to reduce risk to Low. Work
would cost a substantial sum in relation to the value of the property.
M (Moderate Risk) May be tolerated in certain circumstances (subject to regulator’s approval)
but requires investigation, planning and implementation of treatment options
to reduce the risk to Low. Treatment options to reduce to Low risk should be
implemented as soon as practicable.
L (Low Risk) Usually acceptable to regulators. Where treatment has been required to
reduce the risk to this level, ongoing maintenance is required.
VL (Very Low Risk) Acceptable. Manage by normal slope maintenance procedures.
Note: The implications for a particular situation are to be determined by all parties to the risk assessment and may depend
on the nature of the property at risk; these are only given as a general guide.
The table below outlines our qualitative assessment of landslide risk for the development site.
Hazard Likelihood Consequence Assessed Comments
to Property Risk
1. Shallow failure Rare due to the nature of the
through the Rare Minor Very Low underlying soils, the gentle gradients
residual soils on of the natural slope. The consequence
slopes <15 º of such instability would be Minor with
the resultant risk being Very Low.
2. Failure of existing This has been assigned as almost
timber retaining Almost Insignificant Low certain due to the observed
walls located to the Certain performance of the existing timber
rear of the type retaining walls. The consequence
property. would be insignificant due to the
landscape nature and height of walls
(<1.0 m) with the resultant risk being
Low . The design and construction of
these walls had not been supplied,
therefore have not been
independently verified by STA. The
stability/ integrity of the existing
retaining walls remain the
responsibility of the owner/ builder
and design engineers.
3. Deep seated failure Whilst the consequence of such a
within the residual Barely Major Very Low failure would be major, the likelihood
soil profile or Credible is barley credible due to relatively
weathered rock. gentle gradients and absence of
evidence of instability of such nature.
The resultant risk is Very Low.
On the basis of the qualitative risk assessment of likelihood and consequence presented in the table
above, the risk of the area assessed is determined as ‘Low’. This level of risk is acceptable; manage by
normal slope maintenance procedures.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Slope Stability Report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 8.3 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.