Council archive · source document
PM Submission Object - Jacqui Clarke - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041
From: Jacqui
Sent: 25 Apr 2017 21:58:04 +1000
To: Mailbox Council Mail
Subject: Submission in opposition to the Development Application MCU 16/0153 &
REC16/0041
Attachments: Submission Essence of Peregian.pdf
Mr Patrick Murphy
The Assessment Officer
Noosa Shire Council
Dear Mr Murphy
Please find attached my submission in opposition to the above development applications. I strongly
urge Noosa Council to refuse this Development Application.
Sincerely
JacquiClarke
Jacqui Clarke
Phone: 07 5471 3707
Mob: 0438 884 497
Address: 201 David Low Way, Peregian Beach 4573
Virus-free. www.avast.com
Document Set ID: 20307951
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/04/2017
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 2 pages
Page 2
Ke Notice of Submission under the ao NOOSA COUNCIL Sustainable Planning Act 2009 To ensure your submission is properly made you must ensure that: be made to the assessment manager be in writing be signed by each person who made the submission unless the submission is made electronically state the name and residential or business address of each person who made the submission state what aspects of the plan or proposed development your support or oppose and why 6. be received by Council during the formal public notification period As required by the Sustainable Planning Act, all submissions, including individual details, are published on Council's website and therefore will be accessible to intemet search engines. All submissions are published, irrespective of whether or not they are properly made. aAkwWN >= 1. Application details File No MCU16/0153 and REC16/0041 Postal address of Land (as advertised) 215 David Low Way, Peregian Beach 4573 Nature of Proposed Development 2. Submitter details Full name of Submitter Jacqui Clarke Email Address [email protected] Postal address 201 David Low Way Suburb Peregian Beach Signature(s) Jacqui Clarke State Qid Postcode 4573 N.B. This form has been designed for the conyénience of the public, and any persons wishing to lodge a submission are not obliged to use this form. 3. Details of Submission | (We), make the following submission: - Noosa Plan: it is essential that the open space recreation zoning of the site under the Noosa Plan is adhered to and that only limited short term VISITOR accommodation be permitted. - The suggested sale prices of the units/apartments suggested by Tony Scanlon are not in line with current real estate trends in Peregian Beach and are not likely to be achieved. - Construction issues: We live just down from the new IGA shopping centre and are already impacted by noise from the loading docks. The extensive earthworks for new development will necessitate mass importation of fill material with major, adverse traffic and environmental impacts especially as Sandpiper Lane will be the only access for traffic during and after construction. - Traffic impacts: the additional traffic and the restricted access and egress to the development will significantly aggravate existing traffic congestion and safety issues and negatively impact the amenity of Peregian village in the long term. Currently, DLW has become a bottle-neck with the pedestrian crossing to IGA and this will get worse when the IT hub & new community centre is built with the northern crossing. Whether or not there has been an increase in traffic, there is no denying the bumper to bumper traffic that currently blocks our driveway and often extends from the IGA crossing down to the petrol station & garden centre (south of the village). Traffic leaving IGA & the hardware store already has to negotiate the uphill exit on Sandpiper Lane into DLW and bumper to bumper traffic. This will only get worse with the amount of traffic generated by the proposed development Privacy Council will use any personal information provided for the intended Purpose only and for remaining in contact with you. Council is authorised to collect this information in accordance with the Local Government Act 2009 and other Local Government Acts. Your personal information is only accessed by persons authorised to do so. Your personal information is dealt with in accordance with council’s privacy policy. www.noosa.gid.gov.au [email protected] T 07 5329 6500 PO Box 141 Tewantin Qld 4565 | ABN 97 969 214 121 Page 1 of 2
Page 3
application. At the very least, the Scanlon development application should include a pedestrian overpass to replace the crossing at IGA to alleviate the traffic bottle-neck in both directions of DLW. - Services, ecology, water and noise issues. | have already mentioned the issue of noise from the IGA loading dock which impacts us now. This will only get worse with the increased amount of traffic and residents in the proposed development application. Not only resident cars, but the ongoing service trucks from cleaners to garbage collection. Another major concern of mine as a resident of DLW backing onto the national park (wallum), is the displacement of water during rain/flooding. The water table is very close to the surface in this area, and the proposed development area is mostly on swamp (as indicated on the plans) which feeds into Lake Weyba and supports a diverse eco-system. With the proposed retaining walls for the development, no consideration has been given to where the natural water courses will be diverted. In times of heavy rainfall, our backyard floods quite rapidly. This will only get worse once a development of this size occurs as the water will naturally find it's own way downhill (south) - towards our residential area. We also have swamp wallabies and other wildlife including many bird species which will be threatened by over-development as proposed. Tony Scanlon told me himself, that the trees were of no consequence & that they would be replaced with other plantings. This is not acceptable! As a local, | do not want the natural watercourses & wallam destroyed by the unnecessary development of a permanent housing estate! - Non-compliance with Council requirements: density, site cover, gross floor area and building heights are all excessive. We live in this area because we believe that Noosa Council will protect all that we hold valuable in our quality of life and environment. That's why | also voted for de-amalgamation. Finally, as a Marriage Celebrant, | have always promoted Peregian Beach for the beautiful village that it is. My couples come from overseas, interstate & intra-state and stay (along with family & guests) in holiday accommodation in this area, as well as have ceremonies on and in the vicinity of Peregian Beach. They shop, eat, drink and spend time in Peregian village. If a development like Tony Scanlon proposes goes ahead, the area will fast become over-crowded with people and cars for which there is no infrastructure. David Low Way cannot cope with any further increase in traffic. That's why Sunshine Motorway was built - to divert through traffic away from the coast. Our house actually shakes when big Coles trucks & double decker Australia Zoo buses pass by our house. Speed limit of 40km in front of our house is rarely adhered to and nothing permanent has ever been done about it. Getting out of our driveway by car or trying to cross the road is becoming increasingly dangerous. (if necessary, use separate sheet of paper and attach) Page 2 of 2
Used in these records
PM Submission Object - Jacqui Clarke - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041Related documentApplication case desk ↗
PM Submission Object - Jacqui Clarke - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.7 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.