Skip to the record
Mmm.. taste the original NoosaWatch™

Original source · versioned page text

The Royal Mail - Submission

Attached to the e-mail PM Submission - Jillian & Maurie Hill - MCU23/0090, DBW23/0073 & RAL23/0012.

of 2

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

SUBMISSION TO NOOSA COUNCIL

26 MAY 2024

BY JILLIAN & MAURICE HILL (OWNER RESIDENTS, RATE PAYERS, 24 YEARS)
UNIT 11, 2-10 BLAKESLEY STREET, TEWANTIN, QLD 4565

RELATING TO APPLICATION DETAILS: Ref: MCU23/0090, DBW23/0073 & RAL23/0012
WHERE: 118 Poinciana Ave & Diyan Street, Tewantin Qld 4565

ON: Lot 3 on RP40197 & Lot 1 on RP845244

TYPE: Development Permit for Material Change of Use for Extension to Hotel;
Development Permit for Reconfiguration of a Lot for Boundary Realignment;
Development Permit for Building Works Assessable against the Planning Scheme for
Demolition within the Heritage Overlay

DETAILS OF SUBMISSION:

Council has received several submissions from very concerned, long-term owners and
rate payers who live in the four residential blocks on the northern side of Blakesley
Street; in relation to the three Development Permits sought by the current property
owners. These submissions primarily refer to FUTURE PARKING CONGESTION, TWO-
WAY TRAFFIC FLOWS, EXCESSIVE NOISE POTENTIAL, APPEARANCE & LANDSCAPING
and FUTURE PLANS FOR LOT 3 on the corner of Blakesley and Diyan Streets.

PLEASE NOTE THAT WE FULLY ENDORSE ALL SUBMITTED COMMENTS ON THE
PROPOSED FUTURE ENVIRONMENTAL AND SAFETY IMPACTS ON OUR LIFESTYLES
AND FOR MOST BLAKESLEY STREET OWNERS, OUR LONG-EARNED RETIREMENT
INVESTMENTS.

Note also, that the prior quiet ambience and relatively safety of Blakesley Street were
seriously compromised by the travesty of a prior Council’s Woolworths approval; and
subsequent impacts on the whole of the Tewantin township precinct. Blakesley Street
was seriously impacted with little consideration; and the proposed applications will
further compound current parking, traffic and safety (entry & exit, street crossing)
concerns.

Council is fully aware of current traffic and parking challenges in the township, but by
approving the current permits and compromising on the required 183 carparking bays
required by the Noosa Plan 2020 edict, Tewantin’s vehicular destiny will likely parallel
Hastings Street and surrounds — a disaster that could have been prevented with
foresight and better decisions.

We were recently informed by a Noosa councillor that Tewantin is planned for a major
Council investment and upgrade within a few years. We can only request that the
proposed objectives and outcomes of that project are fully considered in the final
approvals for the subject applications. No more compromises, no more bowing to
corporate investors who take their profits out of Noosa Shire.
Log in to download the original file

The Royal Mail - Submission.pdf · 819 KB (small file)

Full text of the other 1 page

Page 2

Finally, we would like to propose some lateral thinking in relation to both parking and
access for the Royal Mail re-development if a senior planning officer or councillor had
30 minutes available to discuss these matters. Contact Maurie Hill Mob 0419 700 427
(past chair Sunshine Coast Business Council of Australia).

We support the re-development of the Royal Mail, but let’s get it right in all aspects,
while we still can.

Sincerely

Dns | RK
~N

  

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.