Original source · versioned page text
2607-53588 SRA - Response with conditions
Attached to the e-mail RAL26/0018 - SARA - Referral agency response – with conditions.
RA6-N SARA reference: 2607-53588 SRA Council reference: RAL26/0018 11 August 2026 Chief Executive Officer Noosa Shire Council PO Box 141 Tewantin QLD 4565 [email protected] Attention: Andrew Gaffney Dear Sir/Madam SARA referral agency response—220 Black Mountain Range Road, Black Mountain (Referral agency response given under section 56 of the Planning Act 2016) The development application described below was confirmed as properly referred by the State Assessment and Referral Agency (SARA) on 21 July 2026. Response Outcome: Referral agency response – with conditions Date of response: 11 August 2026 Conditions: The conditions in Attachment 1 must be attached to any development approval Advice: Advice to the applicant is in Attachment 2 Reasons: The reasons for the referral agency response are in Attachment 3 Development details Description: Development permit Reconfiguring a lot (1 Lot into 5 Lots) SARA role: Referral agency SARA trigger: Schedule 10, Part 9, Division 4, Subdivision 2, Table 1 (Planning Regulation 2017) SEQ (North) Regional Office PO Box 1129, Maroochydore Page 1 of 6 QLD 4558
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 5 pages
Page 2
2607-53588 SRA
Development application for reconfiguring a lot near a state transport
corridor
SARA reference: 2607-53588 SRA
Assessment manager: Noosa Shire Council
Street address: 220 Black Mountain Range Road, Black Mountain
Real property description: Lot 3 on SP258991
Applicant name: Threedom Nominees Pty Ltd
C/- Brennan Planning
Applicant contact details: [email protected]
Human Rights Act 2019 A consideration of the 23 fundamental human rights protected under
considerations: the Human Rights Act 2019 has been undertaken as part of this
decision. It has been determined that this decision does not limit
human rights.
Representations
An applicant may make representations to a concurrence agency, at any time before the application is
decided, about changing a matter in the referral agency response (s.30 Development Assessment
Rules). Copies of the relevant provisions are in Attachment 4.
A copy of this response has been sent to the applicant for their information.
For further information please contact Ruth Creffield, Senior Planning Officer, on 5352 9775 or via email
[email protected] who will be pleased to assist.
Yours sincerely
Jamaica Hewston
Manager
cc Threedom Nominees Pty Ltd C/- Brennan Planning, [email protected]
enc Attachment 1 - Referral agency conditions
Attachment 2 - Advice to the applicant
Attachment 3 - Reasons for referral agency response
Attachment 4 - Representations about a referral agency response provisions
Attachment 5 - Documents referenced in conditions
State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 2 of 6
Page 3
2607-53588 SRA
Attachment 1—Referral agency conditions
(Under section 56(1)(b)(i) of the Planning Act 2016 the following conditions must be attached to any development
approval relating to this application) (Copies of the documents referenced below are found at Attachment 5)
No. Conditions Condition timing
Reconfiguring of a Lot
10.9.4.2.1.1 – Reconfiguring a lot near a state transport corridor—The chief executive administering
the Planning Act 2016 nominates the Director-General of the Department of Transport and Main Roads
to be the enforcement authority for the development to which this development approval relates for the
administration and enforcement of any matter relating to the following conditions:
1. The development must be carried out generally in accordance with At all times.
the following plan:
Plan of Proposed Reconfiguration of Lot 3 on SP258891,
prepared by Max Watterson and Associates, dated 20-04-2026,
reference 25-6775AG, as amended in red by SARA.
2. Direct access is not permitted between the Bruce Highway and the At all times.
subject site.
3. (a) Stormwater management of the development must not cause At all times.
worsening to the operating performance of the State Controlled
Road, such that any works on the land must not:
(i) create any new discharge points for stormwater runoff
onto the State Controlled Road
(ii) concentrate or increase the velocity of flows to State
Controlled Road
(iii) interfere with and/or cause damage to the existing
stormwater drainage on the State Controlled Road
(iv) surcharge any existing culvert or drain on the State
Controlled Road
(v) reduce the quality of stormwater discharge onto the State
Controlled Road
(vi) impede or interfere with any overland flow or hydraulic
conveyance from the State Controlled Road
(vii) reduce the floodplain immunity of the State Controlled
Road.
4. Provide a solid gap-free fence or other solid gap-free structure, Prior to submitting the
constructed of glass, concrete blocks, bricks or fibre cement sheeting Plan of Survey to the
and a minimum height of 1.8 metres along the full extent of the site local government for
boundary to the state-controlled road for proposed Lots 1 and 2, approval and to be
generally in accordance with Plan of Proposed Reconfiguration of Lot maintained at all times
3 on SP258891, prepared by Max Watterson and Associates, dated
20-04-2026, reference 25-6775AG, as amended in red by SARA.
State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 3 of 6
Page 4
2607-53588 SRA
Attachment 2—Advice to the applicant
General advice
1. Terms and phrases used in this document are defined in the Planning Act 2016, its regulation
or the State Development Assessment Provisions (SDAP) (version 3.6). If a word remains
undefined it has its ordinary meaning.
State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 4 of 6
Page 5
2607-53588 SRA
Attachment 3—Reasons for referral agency response
(Given under section 56(7) of the Planning Act 2016)
The reasons for the SARA’s decision are:
The proposed development is for a Development Permit for Reconfiguring of a Lot (1 lot into 5 lots).
The subject site is within 25 metres of a state-controlled road (the Bruce Highway).
SARA assessed the development against the following code of the State Development Assessment
Provisions (SDAP), version 3.6:
o State code 1: Development in a state-controlled road environment.
The development complies with the assessment benchmarks of State code 1 of the SDAP in that the
development, with conditions:
o does not adversely impact the function and efficiency of the state-controlled road
o minimises noise intrusions on a development from a state-controlled transport corridor
o ensures that the impacts of stormwater events associated with development are minimised
and managed to avoid creating any adverse impacts on the state-transport corridor.
Material used in the assessment of the application:
the development application material and submitted plans
Planning Act 2016
Planning Regulation 2017
the SDAP (version 3.6), as published by SARA
the Development Assessment Rules
SARA DA Mapping system
section 58 of the Human Rights Act 2019
Attachment 4—Representations about a referral agency response
provisions
(page left intentionally blank)
State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 5 of 6
Page 6
2607-53588 SRA Attachment 5—Documents referenced in conditions (page left intentionally blank) State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 6 of 6