Original source · versioned page text
Martoo Response to Info Request
Attached to the e-mail MCU18/0003 - 20 Nannygai Street, Noosaville - Response to information request.
Council’s Reference: MCU18/0003 Our Reference: 02266 L03 Our Contact: Nadine Gorton 28th February 2018 The Chief Executive Officer Noosa Council PO BOX 141 TEWANTIN QLD 4565 ATTENTION: - DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT Dear Sir, RE: RESPONSE TO INFORMATION REQUEST Development Application – Material Change of Use for a Type 2 Duplex over land described as Lot 36 on RP63879 and situated at 20 Nannygai Street, Noosaville. I refer to the above application and the information request issued by your Council and dated 29th January 2018. This request listed nine (9) items that Council considers is necessary in order to complete its assessment of the above application. The applicant provides amended plans prepared by Mercury Design which address the information request as follows: Item 1: Provide compliance with maximum plot ratio requirements. Applicant’s Response to Item 1: Please refer to amended plans prepared by Mercury Design that detail compliance with plot ratio requirements. Item 2: Provide compliance with maximum site cover requirements. Applicant’s Response to Item 2: Please refer to amended plans prepared by Mercury Design that detail compliance with site cover requirements. Item 3: Provide amended plans that detail building height. Applicant’s Response to Item 3: Please refer to amended plans prepared by Mercury Design that detail further information regarding building height. The revised plans indicated that the maximum height of the building is 8.24 metres from natural ground surface level. This minor encroachment is considered to comply with the Noosaville Specific Outcomes as detailed below: a) are low rise and have a visual bulk and an architectural scale consistent with structures on adjoining or nearby land; - minor encroachment relates to the ridge line of one of the units and an eave of the other unit, both of which will not be highly visible to the surrounding area. The roof is predominantly well below the stipulated 8.0 metre height limit and only exceeds this requirement due to minimum floor levels required due to stipulated floor levels and is consistent with height concessions approved by Council in the area.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 2 pages
Page 2
Page 2
b) do not exceed a building height of —
iv - 2 Storeys.. – Complies
b) do not visually dominate the street or surrounding spaces; The area of encroachment is located
internal to the site and setback from the street and at 0.24m is relatively minor.
c) preserve the amenity of surrounding land; Proposed height consistent with character of the area.
d) ensure that development responds to the site topography; Revised plans provide two units that
are consistent with the character of the area with the height a requirement of minimum floor height
requirements.
f) are well articulated with strong horizontal and vertical design elements to provide an interesting
streetscape and to complement landform changes and landscapes. Revised plans provide a well
designed development that is consistent with Councils desired character.
Item 4: Provide plans detailing minimum landscape areas.
Applicant’s Response to Item 4: Please refer to amended plans prepared by Mercury Design that detail
compliance with landscape requirements.
Item 5: Provide plans that that address bulk and architectural scale.
Applicant’s Response to Item 5: Please refer to amended plans prepared by Mercury Design that detail
compliance with boundary setbacks and additional architectural treatments including window, wall and
roof treatments. The revised plans provide a significant improvement to the original plans presenting
two different units on the site.
Item 6: Provide plans that address side boundary setbacks.
Applicant’s Response to Item 6: Please refer to amended plans prepared by Mercury Design that detail
compliance with side boundary setbacks.
Item 7: Provide plans that detail 600mm eaves and 5 degree roof pitch
Applicant’s Response to Item 7: Please refer to amended plans prepared by Mercury Design that detail
compliance with eaves to 75% of the building and a roof pitch of 7 % and 22% for the units.
Item 8: Provide plans that demonstrate on site manoeuvering.
Applicant’s Response to Item 8: Please refer to amended plans prepared by Mercury Design that detail
on site manoeuvering.
Item 9: Provide preliminary design plans for earthworks, stormwater and access and carparking.
Applicant’s Response to Item 9: Please refer to amended plans prepared by SCG Engineers that detail
stormwater, access and parking.
The applicant considers that he has now responded to Council’s information request. The Decision Making
Period has therefore commenced and we request that your Council proceeds with its assessment of the
application as soon as possible in accordance with the Planning Act 2016.
Page 3
Page 3 Please contact our Sunshine Coast office if you require any further information and/or clarification. Yours faithfully, Nadine Gorton Senior Planner martoo consulting pty ltd