Council archive · source document
Request to extend relevant period 132003.221199.3
Very large file (37.3 MB): the whole original can take several minutes to open, especially on a phone. Text is quick to read.
... __ ~
~
INNOVATIVE
PLANNING
......... SOLUTIONS
Were a development application to be re-made as at today’s date, a proposal for multiple
dwelling units and accommodation units would:
(a) Not alter the level of assessment relevant to the application -
the application was
originally impact assessable and would remain impact assessable were it required to
be re-submitted;
(b) Not change the amount of infrastructure charges payable for the development as an
existing condition of the approval requires infrastructure charges to be charged at the
rates applicable at the time of payment. To deliver further certainty regarding this
legislative requirement the applicant is also willing to enter into an infrastructure
agreement with the Council requiring that infrastructure charges that will be payable
for the development will be a current rates;
(c)The way that the relevant planning documents affect the land has not changed in any
substantial or materially significant way since the approval of the application.
Importantly both the Shire of Noosa Strategic Plan (1996)and the current Noosa Plan
(2006)identified the land as containing multiple zonings including Attached Housing,
Detached Housing and Open Space Conservation. Therefore these planning documents
(and the currently draft Planning Scheme for the Sunshine Coast) have not substantially
changed in the way that they anticipate development of the site will occur (as the land
use zonings that affecting the site have not changed).
Whilst some conflict exists between the development and the current Noosa Plan
these same conflicts also existed at the time of lodgement of the development
application (and the then relevant Shire of Noosa Strategic Plan). Therefore the
grounds relied upon by the applicant and the grounds that warranted approval of the
development generally remain unchanged despite the change in the relevant planning
documents that has occurred over the life of the development approval. In other words
there is no materially significant additional inconsistencies between the development
and the planning scheme that did not exist at the time of lodgement or approval of the
original application. Evidence to this fact is the Council’s previous approval of an
P: 07 54431444
E: [email protected]
Suite 5,156-158 Alexandra Parade
Page 4 of6 Alexandra Headland Q 4572
PO Box 1043 Maroochydore Q 4558
townplanningsunshinecoast.com .au
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Request to extend relevant period 132003.221199.3Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 37.3 MB (very large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.