Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Original source · versioned page text

SUPERSEDED Reference Document Bushfire Hazard Assessment & Management Plan v 2 June 2024 MCU24 0084 (1)

of 85

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

Bushfire Hazard Assessment & Management Plan v2 NCES REF: J001313
Lot 4 on RP160124 — 658 Louis Bazzo Dr, Ringtail Creek QLD 4565

 

3.6 Quantitative Modelling

Quantitative modelling of the potential bushfire conditions that may be experienced within the VHC
8.1, 9.1, 24.1, & 36.1 hazardous open forest flanking the site has been undertaken to assist in
determining the suitability of the development and any asset setback requirements.

The models used comprise industry standard bushfire equations which have been built into the FPAA
endorsed FLAMESOL computer model. FLAMESOL allows numerous input variables to be adjusted
including fuel loads, fire danger index, site slope and distance to vegetation. FLAMESOL uses the
following algorithms:

e Rate of Spread — McArthur (1973) and Nobel et a/. (1980)

e Flame Length — NSW Rural Fire Service (2001) and Nobel et al. (1980)

e Elevation of Receiver — Douglas and Tan (2005)

e Flame Angle — Douglas and Tan (2005)

e Radian Heat Flux — Drysdale (1999), Sullivan et a/. (2003) and Douglas and Tan (2005)

The FLAMESOL Minimum Distance calculator has been used and comprises an AS 3959:2018
Method 2 (Appendix B) based calculator which can determine a suite of bushfire behaviour variables
including the minimum distances required to achieve a range of different radiant heat level
exposures.

Fuel load inputs have been derived from Planning for Bushfire Resilient Communities (QFES 2019)
based on the nominated potential fuel loads for:

e VHC 8.1 (31t/ha surface and near surface fuels and 35t/ha total fuels)
e VHC 9.1 (21t/ha surface and near surface fuels and 24.2t/ha total fuels)

e VHC 24.1(9.5t/ha surface and near surface fuels and 10.1t/ha total fuels)
e VHC 36.1 (23.8t/ha surface and near surface fuels and 26t/ha total fuels)

Table 2 summarises the slopes and flame width input variables assigned to each of the identified
Sub Units in the Flamesol modelling.

Note, effective slope was measured by utilising the closest adjacent section of the proposed
development as the point of reference when calculating the slope.

Table 2: Flamesol Input Summary

 

 

 

 

 

 

SU6 — VHC 36.1 17° Downslope 1° Across slope 100m
SU7a-VHC 9.1 1° Across/Upslope 1° Across slope 100m
SU7b- VHC 9.1 10° Downslope 1° Across slope 100m
SU7c —- VHC 9.1 13° Downslope 1° Across slope 100m
SU8a — VHC 24.1 6° Downslope 1° Across slope 100m
SU8b — VHC 24.1 1° Across/Upslope 1° Across slope 100m

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

North

  
 

© 2024 17

Document Set ID: 23422887
Version: 3, Version Date: 14/01/2025

Log in to download the original (SUPERSEDED Reference Document Bushfire Hazard Assessment & Management Plan v 2 June 2024 MCU24 0084 (1).pdf)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.