Council archive · source document
Engineering Response · MCU23/0094
Information Required
35. The total cut and fill volumes across the site.
36. A post development contour plan.
37. The height of all proposed retaining walls.
38. Confirm if the extent of cut and fill will be assessable per Figure 5.9.1.1 below.
Note - that Acid Sulfate Soil reporting will be required if earthwork volumes exceed those specified below.
Response
Please refer revised plans attached to include additional information regarding total cut/fill volumes and retaining
wall heights. No earthworks (including pipe trenches) have been proposed below RL5.0m, therefore in accordance
with the State planning policy 2017 and the above extracted image, Acid Sulphate Soil testing and management
are not assessable.
If you require any further information, please do not hesitate to contact our office.
Yours faithfully
Digitally
signed by
S
Richardson
TOM HARRNGTON – RPEQ 27698
For and on behalf of
SCG CONSULTING ENGINEERS
Enc SCG Drawings Numbers: 33132 – CS, CN, OW1.1 thru OW2.2, OW3.1.B thru OW4.2.B, OW4.3,
OW4.4.B, OW4.5, OW5.1.A, OW6.1.B, OW6.2.A, SW1.1.B thru SW1.4.B
SCG Consulting Engineers Page 5 of 5 SCG Ref: 33132(L1)
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Engineering Response.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 1.4 MB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.