Original source · versioned page text
Bushfire Hazard Assessment
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (32.2 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Bushfire Hazard Assessment 14 Serenity Close, Noosa Heads 7 RESULTS The modelling results are described in terms of the extent and category of bushfire prone areas and potential fireline intensity. 7.1 BUSHFIRE BEHAVIOUR Modelling results based on the AEP 5% FFDI indicated that: ● the subject land did not contain areas of potential fireline intensity, ● although part of the lot containing the development is within the potential impact buffer, the proposed hotel is not located within 100m of bushfire prone areas (potential impact buffer) (Refer to Figure 7 and Map 10, attached). Although the proposed development and bushfire hazard model incorporates the effect of retention of native vegetation within Environmental Management and Conservation zoned areas of the land, modelling results indicate that the vegetation retention does not contribute to bushfire hazard. This is primarily because the land to south of the site contains a mosaic of continuous and discontinuous areas of fuel comprised of pedestrian pathways, trails, mown areas, weed-dominated regrowth, native regrowth and patches of remnant vegetation. The combination of discontinuous and continuous fuel types within a narrow corridor does not readily permit establishment or spread of a significant bushfire. That is, the configuration of vegetation is sufficiently narrow and surrounded by built-up areas (VHC 41.4) such that the vegetation is unlikely to support a fully developed flame front (Catchpole et al. 1982). These areas are less likely to ignite due to their disconnection with fuels that can carry running fire fronts. If ignited by a point or line ignition, these areas will limit the fire head width, hence fireline intensity. The combined effect of lower ignition likelihood and lower intensity is likely to result in fireline intensity of less than 4000 kW/m, and this presents a low hazard to land use planning and development assessment. The results of the assessment demonstrated that planning and management measures to mitigate bushfire hazard are not required as part of the proposed development. 21 | 38
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.