MCU12/0023 Notice of Submission - Paul Jeckeln

    ~.
         HotmaiI Print Message                                                                        Page 1 of2
~
                :




          Fw: Scanlan Property Development                                 -
                                                                               Objection to

                                                                                                                               ,0
               {~         ;1~se-s$      ~      7    vYl.+NA~   1!1(.
                                                                                                 ,uiiiiiiii-
                                                                                                      80481327




              SualSff,,Je          Lo~T            fl.E& ,tJ,J. L()VNCIL-
                                                                  "




                                                                                               //9;

               L.tx:..J< 1>
                         (f   Bkt1      12..
                                                                                    Isox: .r).b.//e,l, .".~...........I
                                                                                                      R;
                                                                                                                              SJ)


                                                                                          IYJ W
                                                                                                  /J../O(),}. ($
               SdtJ~H-IJJE         COAT           Me.          ({(h         I.J_$’tJ


                                                                                                                    ..

                                                                                                                  0=
                                                                                                                  a:_g   >-


                                                                                                           ~      OS
                                                                                                           :IE:   CI)~
            From: Paul Jeckeln                                                                                     z
                                                                                                            -#

            sent: Friday, April 27, 20125:24 PM
            To: [email protected] ;[email protected] ;
            kerri [email protected]
            Subject: Scanlan Property Development Objection to
                                                    -




            Dear Sirs,


            I refer to your notice on page 22 of the Sunshine Coast Daily of 23 April 2012 where
            Scanion ueveiopments is seeKing to increase its out oor   ining faciiities by ::>6 seats for its
            Peregian Development. I suspect this is to increase return to the developer from the
            property by way of increased rental vaJue or property sales with complete disregard for
            the existing land owners.


            I am writing to you as the owner ot 208 David low Way, Pereglan Beach, to lodge my

            objection to the planned variation to the Scanlon Development of the Caravan Park at
            Peregian Beach. The proposed amendments wourd create a neighbourhood noise:



                .  Directly from diners and associated wait staff.
                . Truck deliveries of additional foodstuffs associated with an extra 56 seats.
                .  Increased traffic noise associated with an extra 56 seats.


            As an owner this has cumulative impact on my property, impacting directly on my current
            tenants (and subsequently my available returns) or my own quaJity of life (1 intend to retire

            to the area) as well as limiting my potential market should I divest the property.


            I urge Counci1 to "not approve" this va ation on the basis of a money grab by the

            developer at the expens.e of local residents. Alternatively the developer should be
            requested to inch,lde the cost of noise abatement in his proposal and/or compensate