16. APP K. Local Code Response

              Column 1                                           Column 2                                         Proposal                        Complies
            Specific Outcomes                      Probable solutions (if code assessable)
           where 1 storey; and
      iv. for all other zones— 2 storeys;
c) do not visually dominate the street or
      surrounding spaces;
d) preserve the amenity of surrounding land;
e) ensure that development responds to the
      site topography; and
(f) are well articulated with strong horizontal
      and vertical design elements to provide
      an interesting streetscape and to
      complement landform changes and
      landscapes.

Setbacks
O9 Buildings and other structures are             S9.1 Buildings and structures comply with the   The proposal will be largely compliant with      Yes
appropriately designed and sited to—              setbacks identified in Schedule 1 - Minimum     the    minimum        boundary      setback
a) provide amenity for users of the premises      Boundary Setbacks.                              requirements, other than the following:
    as well as preserve the visual and acoustic
    amenity of adjoining and nearby                                                               The north eastern corner of the proposed
    properties;                                                                                   Retail Business Type 6 and/or Industrial Type
b) provide adequate distance from adjoining                                                       1 or 2 building is 4.05m to Walter Hay Drive
    land uses;                                                                                    (considered to be a secondary frontage). It
c) allow space for required vehicle parking;                                                      should be noted that this is only at the very
d) preserve any existing vegetation that will                                                     corner of the building as it angles away
    buffer the proposed building;                                                                 from the boundary with the setback quickly
e) allow for landscaping to be provided                                                           increasing to a maximum of 10.59m. As
    between buildings;                                                                            such, the non-compliance relates to a
f) maintain the visual continuity and pattern                                                     minor 450mm. This minor encroachment is
    of buildings and landscape elements                                                           considered to be appropriate given:
    within the street;                                                                                    The existing vegetation buffering
g) avoid large areas of continuous wall                                                                    the proposed building from Walter
    planes by varying the building setbacks                                                                Hay Drive;
    and using appropriate techniques to                                                                   There not being any adjoining land
    provide visual relief; and                                                                             uses;
g) help protect the natural character and                                                                 The proposed addition of further
    visual amenity of the Noosa River system                                                               significant landscaping treatments



NOOSAVILLE LOCALITY CODE                                                                                                                            Page 5