Skip to the record
Every meeting, every word.

Council archive · source document

Minor Change request · 51901.3614.03

of 6

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

           Removes an incentive or offset component    No incentive       or    offset    components
            that would have balanced the negative       incorporated.
            impact of the development; or
           Impacts on infrastructure provisions.       The proposed development does not impact
                                                        upon infrastructure provisions.


      ii.   if a development application for the development, including the change, were made
            when the change application is made would not cause—

        Description / Provisions                        Comment / Response

        A. the    inclusion     of      prohibited      No prohibited development proposed.
           development in the application; or

        B. referral to a referral agency, other than    The original application did not trigger
           to the chief executive, if there were no     referral. No additional referrals are required.
           referral agencies for the development
           application; or

        C. referral to extra referral agencies, other   No extra referrals are required.
           than to the chief executive; or

        D. a referral agency to assess the              No      additional     referral    assessment
           application against, or have regard to,      triggers/aspects are required.
           matters prescribed by regulation under
           section 55(2), other than matters the
           referral agency must have assessed the
           application against, or have had regard
           to, when the application was made; or

        E. public notification if public notification   The original application required public
           was not required for the development         notification.
           application.


Accordingly, the subject change is a minor change.

ASSESSMENT
Pursuant to Clause 81 (4) & (5) the responsible entity must consider the statutory instrument, or
other document, as in effect when the development application for the development approval
was properly made.

        Comment: The proposed changes are minor and do not offend the assessment criteria that
        applied when the development application was made or is now in effect.


However, the responsible entity may give the weight the responsible entity considers is
appropriate, in the circumstances, to—
   (a)     the statutory instrument or other document as in effect when the change application
           was made; or
   (b)     if the statutory instrument or other document is amended or replaced after the
           change application is made but before it is decided—the amended or replacement
           instrument or document; or
   (c)     another statutory instrument—

Used in these records

About this file

File size
257 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Minor Change request.pdf · 257 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.