2016-05-10 Planning & Environment Committee Agenda

PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA                                         10 MAY 2016


   The change would not require the application to be referred to additional concurrence
     agencies;
   The original application was code assessable and the change would not cause the
     application to become impact assessable; and
   The change would not cause the approval to involve prohibited development.
On this basis, the applicant has followed lawful process in making a request under s369 of the
Act.


3.1. Assessment – Planning Scheme
The applicant seeks changes to Conditions 3 and 8. An assessment of each of the requested
changes is provided below.
Applicant’s request
Condition 3 – Changes to the Approved Plans
     Approved Plans
     3.    Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally comply
           with the approved plans of development. The approved plans listed in the following
           table and may be further amended by the conditions herein.
             Plan No.   Rev.   Plan/Document Name                                         Date
             DD 1.2     C      Site plan, prepared by Sparks Architects                   03.11.15
             DD 1.3     C      Roof Plan, prepared by Sparks Architects                   03.11.15
             DD 1.4     C      Bedroom Mezzanine, prepared by Sparks Architects           03.11.15
             DD 1.5     C      Ground Floor Plan, prepared by Sparks Architects           03.11.15
             DD 1.6     C      Lower Ground Floor, prepared by Sparks Architects          03.11.15
             DD 1.7     C      Pool Terrace Floor Plan, prepared by Sparks Architects     03.11.15
             DD 2.1     C      North West Elevation, prepared by Sparks Architects        03.11.15
             DD 2.2     C      North East Elevation, prepared by Sparks Architects        03.11.15
             DD 2.3     C      South East Elevation, prepared by Sparks Architects        03.11.15
             DD 2.4     B      South West Elevation, prepared by Sparks Architects        01.09.15

The applicant requests changes to Condition 3 to allow amended plans reflecting the various built
form changes to the approved development.
Assessment
The proposal is for a house of a lessor scale, provides a greater seaward setback and retains the
approved side setbacks except for an encroachment of a privacy screen associated with the
swimming pool which has been relocated to within the front setback. A deck and stairs to the
northern boundary also encroaches into the setback. The encroachments are addressed below.
The building height in metres has been slightly reduced with much less of the building proposed
to the maximum height of 12m, which results in a reduction of building height presenting to Park
Crescent.
Figure 2 shows the reduction in the scale of the development with the approved development
hatched in red over the proposed.




                                                                                        Page 12 of 96