Original source · versioned page text
Prelodgement Meeting Minutes
PRE-LODGEMENT NOTES
Development Assessment
1. PRE-LODGEMENT MEETING DETAILS
Application No: PLM21/0046
Date: 1 September 2021
Applicant Attendees: Geoff Gibbins, Urban Strategies
Troy Hanifn, Applicant
Michael Johnston, Invilla Architecture
Council Attendees: Lisa Pienaar, Development Planner
Mark Lewis, Co-ordinator, Engineering
Jada Lyons, Graduate Planner
2. PROPOSAL
Street address: 65 & 67 Elanda St Sunshine Beach
Real property description: Lot 410 RP 48112
Planning Scheme: Noosa Plan 2020
Proposal Details: Multiple Dwelling Units x 4
3. SUPPORTING INFORMATION (PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT)
Documents / Plans
Cover Page (front and rear respective), Sheet 1 of 15, dated 27.08.2021 and prepared by
InvillaDesigns
Existing site plan, Sheet 2 of 15, dated 27.08.2021 and prepared by InvillaDesigns
Site plan, Sheet 3 of 15, dated 27.08.2021 and prepared by InvillaDesigns
Basement floor plan, Sheet 4 of 15, dated 27.08.2021 and prepared by InvillaDesigns
Ground floor plan, Sheet 5 of 15, dated 27.08.2021 and prepared by InvillaDesigns
First floor plan, Sheet 6 of 15, dated 27.08.2021 and prepared by InvillaDesigns
Second floor plan, Sheet 7 of 15, dated 27.08.2021 and prepared by InvillaDesigns
Roof plan, Sheet 8 of 15, dated 27.08.2021 and prepared by InvillaDesigns
Elevations A & B, Sheet 9 of 15, dated 27.08.2021 and prepared by InvillaDesigns
Elevations C, Sheet 10 of 15, dated 27.08.2021 and prepared by InvillaDesigns
Elevations D, Sheet 11 of 15, dated 27.08.2021 and prepared by InvillaDesigns
This document is a record of pre-lodgement discussions and will not be made available for public viewing. Pre-lodgement
discussions are conducted to explore development options and requirements, identify issues and provide guidance to prospective
applicants about Council’s policies for development. The recorded discussion items and outcomes in no way imply or commit to
an approval of the proposal on the part of Council or Council officers, nor guarantee that all potential issues associated with a
development proposal have been raised / identified. When a formal development application is lodged, the proposal will be
assessed on its planning merits in accordance with Council’s policy framework existing at the time of the assessment.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 3 pages
Page 2
4. PLANNING SCHEME INFORMATION
Development Type: OPW x ROL MCU x BA
Level of Assessment: Code
Zone: High Density Residential
Precinct: Not applicable
Local Plan Area: Coastal Communities
Overlays: Not applicable
5. ADVICE & INFORMATION
Lisa Pienaar - Comments
1. Storeys: It is noted that the proposal is 4 storeys. Performance outcome PO5 of the
High Density Residential Zone code allows a maximum of 3 storeys. The proposal must
comply with this provision. Where it does not, provide significant justification for the non-
compliance.
2. Site cover: Performance outcome PO7 of the High Density Residential Zone code allows
a maximum site cover of 40%. The proposal must comply with this provision. Provide
site cover calculations with the application.
3. Plot ratio: Performance outcome PO8 of the High Density Residential Zone code allows
a maximum plot ratio of 0.65:1. The proposal must comply with this provision. Refer to
the Gross Floor area definition in the Noosa Plan. Provide calculations with the
application.
4. Access and gatehouses: Three access driveways result in an expanse of hard stand
area - 17.76 metres across a frontage of 31 metres. This also reduces the opportunity
for landscaping in the front setback. Development must consolidate access points and
one access point is recommended for this site. Further, refer to the High Density
Residential zone code with regard to the setback and articulation of multiple garages
where viewed from the street. The gatehouses in the front setback and walkways create
additional hardstand and limit available landscaping area. Two gatehouses in the front
setback is considered excessive and where part of an application, you would need to
demonstrate that it is considered consistent with the streetscape.
5. Design: The High Density Residential Zone and Coastal Communities Local Plan Code
refers to design elements and the proposal is not considered to comply with the design
elements in the code. Units must present as small separate dwellings, rather than one
large, individual building. This can be achieved through offsetting or staggering
dwellings and varying roof form. The building must include different external materials,
finishes and textures, avoid bulky single plane finishes, and present as lightweight using
natural finishes which break up the bulk of the building.
The plans indicate that the building will be quite dominant and there is a concern that it
is not reflective of the subtropical design prevalent in the coastal communities of Noosa.
Further, as this site is elevated there is particular concern regarding the rear elevation,
as it does not comply with Performance outcome PO14 of the High Density Residential
zone code. The design requires revision to comply with the relevant codes.
This document is a record of prelodgement discussions and will not be made available for public viewing. Prelodgement
discussions are conducted to explore development options and requirements, identify issues and provide guidance to prospective
applicants about Council’s policies for development. The recorded discussion items and outcomes in no way imply or commit to
an approval of the proposal on the part of Council or Council officers, nor guarantee that all potential issues associated with a
development proposal have been raised / identified. When a formal development application is lodged, the proposal will be
assessed on its planning merits in accordance with Council’s policy framework existing at the time of the assessment.
Page 3
6. Roof top terraces: The entire roof space is shown as a roof top terrace. Acceptable
outcome AO7.2 of Coastal Communities Local Plan Code and Acceptable outcome
AO15.2 of the High Density Residential zone code seeks that development does not
include a roof top terrace. Corresponding Performance outcome PO15 states that roof
forms:
contribute positively to the local skyline;
complement the character of the locality and the topography of the site;
avoid box profiles/parapets; and
do not create opportunities for overlooking the private open space or internal
spaces of neighbourhood properties.
The extent of the proposed roof top terraces will provide significant overlooking
opportunities into surrounding property. Where a roof top terrace is created, consider
limiting the footprint and centrally locating the roof top terrace which thereby limits
overlooking and the need for screening devices etc that add to the bulk of the building
and encroach on the height limit. Additionally, where roof top terraces exist, provide an
analysis with regard to overlooking opportunities and identify other potential solutions to
mitigate impacts and that comply with Performance outcome PO15.
7. Balconies: Balconies intrude in the rear setback and provide significant overlooking
opportunities. The building also sits higher than the existing buildings to the rear due to
the slope of the land. The building should comply with the required setbacks and where
it does not, provide an analysis with regard to overlooking opportunities and potential
solutions.
8. Landscaping: Minimum landscaping requirements is 40% of site (60% of that is soft
landscaping). Indicate in the application, what mature vegetation is to be retained within
the site.
9. Plans: The application should include plans that clearly show the building height relative
to natural and finished ground. This will include RL’s for the roof of the building and the
natural and finished ground levels. Include section plans.
Mark Lewis - Comments
10. Access: Council has concerns with the proposal for 3 access driveways. The number of
driveways will create a significant amount of hardstand within the road reserve and
impact upon the potential for on-street parking. It is also noted that while the
development is over 2 lots, the development is essentially a 4 unit development and
would require on-site manoeuvring (refer to AO10 of the code). Any application would
need to demonstrate how the proposed access will achieve compliance with The Noosa
Plan – Driveways and Carparking Code (specifically PO1, PO3, PO7, PO8, PO10 and
PO18).
11. Frontage Works: The development of the site will need to include the construction of
frontage works across the full frontage of the site. The works would be similar to that
undertaken on the adjoining properties (road widening, kerb and channel and footpath).
12. Stormwater: It is noted that there is no downstream Council drainage system for the
development to connect to. The development of the site would need a stormwater
drainage system that collects and controls the runoff and discharges to a lawful point of
discharge. Any application will need to include a Stormwater Management Plan
prepared by a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland (RPEQ). It is expected
that the SWMP will include a combination of discharge to Elanda Street, detention and
on-site infiltration. Please note that Council does not support the use of pumps to
discharge stormwater.
This document is a record of prelodgement discussions and will not be made available for public viewing. Prelodgement
discussions are conducted to explore development options and requirements, identify issues and provide guidance to prospective
applicants about Council’s policies for development. The recorded discussion items and outcomes in no way imply or commit to
an approval of the proposal on the part of Council or Council officers, nor guarantee that all potential issues associated with a
development proposal have been raised / identified. When a formal development application is lodged, the proposal will be
assessed on its planning merits in accordance with Council’s policy framework existing at the time of the assessment.
Page 4
13. Services: It is expected that service connections for water, power and
telecommunications can be provided from the Elanda Street frontage.
It is noted that a sewer main extends through the site adjacent to the rear boundary.
Unitywater will most likely require the creation of an easement over the sewer main and
this easement may impact on the design and location of elements of the stormwater
management system. It is recommended that Unitywater be contacted prior to further
design on the stormwater management system.
6. INFRASTRUCTURE CHARGES
A request for written advice for an Infrastructure Charges Contribution Estimate relevant to
your proposal may be obtained for a fee.
7. FURTHER ADVICE TO BE SOUGHT
You are advised to contact Unitywater and any relevant Queensland Government Agencies
for their specific requirements in respect of your proposal.
Yours faithfully,
Lisa Pienaar
Development Planner
This document is a record of prelodgement discussions and will not be made available for public viewing. Prelodgement
discussions are conducted to explore development options and requirements, identify issues and provide guidance to prospective
applicants about Council’s policies for development. The recorded discussion items and outcomes in no way imply or commit to
an approval of the proposal on the part of Council or Council officers, nor guarantee that all potential issues associated with a
development proposal have been raised / identified. When a formal development application is lodged, the proposal will be
assessed on its planning merits in accordance with Council’s policy framework existing at the time of the assessment.