Original source · versioned page text
Appendix C - SDAP
Attached to the e-mail MCU15/0119 Development Application.
19.1 Access to state-controlled roads state code
Table 19.1.1: All davalanmeant
Tew cil cf
PO1 Any road accoss location to the
state-controlled road from adjacent land
does not compromise the safety and
@fficiency of the state-controlled road.
ar
nce
esponse
gic ch aa ed '
AO1.1 Any road access location to tha state-controlled
road from adjacent land complies with a decision under
section 62 of the TIA,
OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply
NIA
It ls proposed that all vehicular access to the development
occur at the lower order local roads: Pearsons Road.
A01.2 Any road access location for the development is
provided from a lower order road where an altemative to
the state-controlled road exists.
AND
A01.3 A traffic Impact assessment certified by a
Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland {RPEQ)
demonstrates that the development will malntein the
safety and efficiency of the state-controllad road.
AND
01.4 Any road access location meets the sight distance
requirements outlined in Volume 3, Part 3 of the Road
planning and design manual, 2" edition, Department of
‘Transport and Main Roads, 2013.
AND
A01.5 Any road access location is not located adjacent to
an existing or planned functional area of an intersection In
accordance with Volume 3, parts 4 and 4A of the Road
planning and design manual, 2" edition, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2013.
AND
01.6 Any road access location does not conflict with any
adjacent lands' access location and operation.
Editor’s note: In order to demonstrate that the acceptable
outcomes can be achieved, it is recommended that a traffic
impact assessment, certified by an RPEQ, be provided. It should
be prepared In accordance with the Guidelines for assassmont of
fad impacts of development (GARID), Depariment of Main
Roads, 2008, and the requirements of Volume 3, parta 4 and 4A
of the Road planning end design manust, 2“ edition, Deparment
State Development Assesament Provisions
22 Novembet 2013 V4.1
Module 19 — State transport network functionality
19.1 Access to state-controlled roads state code
Page 1 of 4
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 5 pages
Page 2
of Transport and Main Reads, 2013, SIDRA Bnaiysss or Taffic modelling. Direct sesso ty 0 innficdl access reed POz Access to a limited access road Is In | No acceptable outcome is prescribed. NIA accordance with the approved limited access policy. Editor's note: Limited access roars are declared by the chief executive under section 54 of the TIA. Details can be acoeseed by tontacting the appropriates DTMR regional office. Hibs ores acouesen G Way cascaiedread i A | POS The number of road access 03.1 Development does not increase the number of If locations to the state-controlled road road access locations to the state-controlled road. maintains the safety and efficiency of the state-controlled road. PO4 The number of road access AQ4,1 Where multiple road access locations to the g locations to the state-controlled road is Premises exist, access ia rationalised to reduce the overall rationalised to maintain the safety and number of road access locations to the state-controlled afficiency of the state-controlled road, foad. AND AG4.2 Shared or combined road access locations are wi Provided for adjoining land having similar uses to rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the state-controlled road. Editor's note: Shared road access locations may require easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacant lots. If this is required, then the applicant must register reciprocal access easements on the titles of both of the lots for the shared access. Sa Se > Ser <r? = £ a « 05.1 Any road access location meets the minimum a the safety and efficiency of the state- standards essociated with the design vehicle. controlled road. Editor's note: The design vehicle to be considered Is the same as the design vehicle set under the relevant local government Planning schemes, AND A085,2 Any road access location Is designed to "4 State Development Assesemant Provisions 22 November 2013 V1.1 Module 19 — State transport network functionality 19.1 Access to state-controlled roads state code Page 2 of 4
Page 3
Performance outcomes
2S
accommodate the forecast volume of venicie movements
In the peak periods of operation or conducting the
proposed use of the premises.
AND
AOQS5.3 Any road access location is designed to
accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of
the final stage of development.
AND
AO5.4 Any roed access location, for an urban activity, Is
designed in accordance with the relevant local
government standards or JPWEAQ R-050, R-051 and R-
053 drawings.
AND
AGS5.5 Any road access location for all other uses other
than urban activities is designed in accordanca with
Volume 3, parts 4 and 4A of the Road planning and
design manual, 2™ edition, Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2013.
POS Tuming movements for vahicles
‘AO6.1 The road access location provides for left in and
N/A
entering and exiting the premises via the | left out tuning movements only.
road access location maintain the safety | anp
and efficiency of the state-controlled
A06.2 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are NIA
designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the
premises in a forward gear.
Editor's note: The design vehicle to be considered is the same ag
the design vehicia set under the relevant local government
Planning scheme.
PO? On-site circulation is suitably 07.1 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space NIA
designed to accommodate the design §s provided to ensura the flow of traffic on the state-
vehicle associated with the proposed controlied road Is not compromised by an overflow of
land use, In order to angure that there Is | traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with
No impact on the safety and efficiency of AS2890—Parking facilities.
the state-controlled road. AND
AQ7.2 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that NIA
State Development Assaasment Provisions
22 November 2013 V1.1
Module 19 — State transport network functionality
19.1 Access to state-controlled roads state code
Page 4
the flow of traffic on the state-contoiied road is not disturbed by traffic queuiny to access the site. PO8 Any proposed temporary road access locations ensure that the eafety and efficiency of the state-controlled road is meintained. Editor's note: Temporary road access lovations may be condiffoned to ensure the temporary nature of the access. Where appropiate, use of the temporary access may be restricted to the approved type and number Of vehicles, and the times the temporary access is able to ba used will also be limited. No acceptable outcome Is prescribed, POS Development having road access to a local road within 100 metres of an Intersection with a state-contratied road maintains the safety and efficlency of the state-controlled road. located as far as possible irom where the road Intersects with the state-controlled road and does not compromise the existing operation or any future upgrades to the intersection or state-controlled road. AND 08.2 The road access location to the local road network is In accordance with Volume 3, paris 4 and 4A of the Road planning and design manual, 2™ edition, Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2013, and Is based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a period cf 10 years past completion of the final stage of development. AND AO9.3 Vehicular access to the local read and internal vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the intersection with the state-controlled road or along the state-controlled road itself. State Development Assessment Provisions 22 November 2013 V1.1 Module 19 — State transport network functionality 18.1 Access to state-controlled roads state code
Page 5
19.3 Transport infrastructure and network design state code zi Eps Response column key: @ Achieved P/S Performance solution NIA Not applicable PO1 Development does not compromise | AO1.1 Any impact from the development on the safe and N/A The proposed development works do not impact on the the safe and efficient management or efficient management and operation of the state transport management or operation of state transport infrastructure. operation of state transport Infrastructure | corridor or transport network is identified and mitigated. or transport networks, Edltor’s note: A traffic impact assessment will assist in addressing this accaptable outcome, A traffic Impact assessment should idenéify any upgrade works required to mitigate Impacts on the safe and efficient management and operation of the state transport conidor. PO2 Development does not compromisa | AQ2.1 Written advice has been provided by DTMR thst NA planned upgrades to state transport thare are no planned upgrades of state transport infrastructure or the development of infrastructure or future state transport corridore which will future state transport Infrastructure In be compromised by the development. future state transport corridors. OR both of tite following acceptable outcomes apply 02.2 The layout and design of the proposed a The proposed development works do not Impact on the development accommodates planned upgrades to delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state adjacent state transport Infrastructure in the stata transport corridors, transport corridor. AND AO2.3 The layout and design of the development does w ‘The proposed development works de not Impact on the not compromise the delivery of state transport delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state Infrastructure in future state tranaport comidors. transport corridors. Editor's note: A traffic impact assesament will assist In addressing this acceptable outcome. Pup ilew ies ; v => PO3 Development does not compromise | AQ3.1 Any Impact from the development on the safe and N/A The proposed development works do not compromise the the safe and efficent management or efficient management and operation of the state- safe and efficient management or operation of state operation of state-controlled roads. controlled road is identified and mitigated. transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors. Editor's note: A traffic impact assessment will | Editor's note: A trafilc Impact assessment will assiet in aeelst In addressing this parformance addressing this acceptable outcome. outcome. : PO4 Development does not compromise | AO4.1 Written advice has been provided by DTMR that NIA lanned upgrades of the state-controlled State Development Assessment Provicions 22 November 2013 V1.1 there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads Module 18 — State transport network functionality 19.3 Transport Infrastructure and network design state code Page 1 of 2
Page 6
Performance outcomes | road network or delivery of tuure state- controlled roads. Acceptable outcomes or future state-coniroiied roads which will ba compromised by the development, OR ‘AQ4.2 Any Impact from the development doas not a ‘The proposed development works do not impact on the compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled delivery of state transport infrastructure or future upgrades road network or the delivary of future state-controlled of the state-controlled road network, roads. Editor's note: A traffic impact essessment will assist In eddressing thia acceptable outcome. POS Upgrade works on, of associated AO5.1 Upgrade works for the development are consistent NYA No upgrade works proposed. with, the state-controlled road network with the requirements of the Roed planning and design are undertaken in accordance with manual, 2" edition, Department of Transport and Main applicable standards. Roads, 2043. AND 05.2 The design and staging of upgrade works on or NIA Ne upgrade works proposed. associated with the state-controlied road network are consistent with planned upgrades. PO6 Development does not impose 06.1 New roads proposed as part of the development NIA No new roads proposed. Development includes Internal traffic loadings on the state-controlled are consistent with the road hlerarchy adopted by the access driveways only. foad network which could be relevant local government, and new lower order roads do accommodated on the local read not connect directly to a state-controlled road. network, AND 06.2 Where the opportunity is avaliable, development NIA provides for road access locations to lower order raads, AND A0O6.3 Where possible, the layout and design of the development encourages traffic generated by the development to use lower order roads. N/A ‘State Development Assessment Provisions 22 November 2013 V1.1 Module 19 — State transport network functionality 19.3 Transport infrastructure and network design state code Page 2 of 2