Skip to the record
The definitive source for everything Noosa Council.

Original source · versioned page text

Appendix C - SDAP

Attached to the e-mail MCU15/0119 Development Application.

of 6

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Page text read automatically using OCR, there may be inaccuracies

19.1 Access to state-controlled roads state code

Table 19.1.1: All davalanmeant

 

  

Tew cil cf
PO1 Any road accoss location to the
state-controlled road from adjacent land
does not compromise the safety and
@fficiency of the state-controlled road.

 

 

ar
nce

    

esponse

 

 

 

 

gic ch aa ed '
AO1.1 Any road access location to tha state-controlled
road from adjacent land complies with a decision under
section 62 of the TIA,

OR all of the following acceptable outcomes apply

NIA

It ls proposed that all vehicular access to the development
occur at the lower order local roads: Pearsons Road.

 

A01.2 Any road access location for the development is
provided from a lower order road where an altemative to
the state-controlled road exists.

AND

 

A01.3 A traffic Impact assessment certified by a
Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland {RPEQ)
demonstrates that the development will malntein the
safety and efficiency of the state-controllad road.

AND

 

01.4 Any road access location meets the sight distance
requirements outlined in Volume 3, Part 3 of the Road
planning and design manual, 2" edition, Department of
‘Transport and Main Roads, 2013.

AND

 

A01.5 Any road access location is not located adjacent to
an existing or planned functional area of an intersection In
accordance with Volume 3, parts 4 and 4A of the Road
planning and design manual, 2" edition, Department of
Transport and Main Roads, 2013.

AND

 

 

01.6 Any road access location does not conflict with any
adjacent lands' access location and operation.

Editor’s note: In order to demonstrate that the acceptable
outcomes can be achieved, it is recommended that a traffic
impact assessment, certified by an RPEQ, be provided. It should
be prepared In accordance with the Guidelines for assassmont of
fad impacts of development (GARID), Depariment of Main

 

Roads, 2008, and the requirements of Volume 3, parta 4 and 4A
of the Road planning end design manust, 2“ edition, Deparment

 

State Development Assesament Provisions
22 Novembet 2013 V4.1

 

 

 

Module 19 — State transport network functionality

19.1 Access to state-controlled roads state code
Page 1 of 4
Log in to download the original file

Appendix C - SDAP.pdf · 302 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

Full text of the other 5 pages

Page 2

  

of Transport and Main Reads, 2013, SIDRA Bnaiysss or Taffic
modelling.

 

 

Direct sesso ty 0 innficdl access reed

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

POz Access to a limited access road Is In | No acceptable outcome is prescribed. NIA
accordance with the approved limited
access policy.
Editor's note: Limited access roars are
declared by the chief executive under section
54 of the TIA. Details can be acoeseed by
tontacting the appropriates DTMR regional
office.
Hibs ores acouesen G Way cascaiedread i A
| POS The number of road access 03.1 Development does not increase the number of If
locations to the state-controlled road road access locations to the state-controlled road.
maintains the safety and efficiency of the
state-controlled road.
PO4 The number of road access AQ4,1 Where multiple road access locations to the g
locations to the state-controlled road is Premises exist, access ia rationalised to reduce the overall
rationalised to maintain the safety and number of road access locations to the state-controlled
afficiency of the state-controlled road, foad.
AND
AG4.2 Shared or combined road access locations are wi
Provided for adjoining land having similar uses to
rationalise the overall number of direct accesses to the
state-controlled road.
Editor's note: Shared road access locations may require
easements to provide a legal point of access for adjacant lots. If
this is required, then the applicant must register reciprocal access
easements on the titles of both of the lots for the shared access.
Sa Se > Ser <r?
= £ a «
05.1 Any road access location meets the minimum a
the safety and efficiency of the state- standards essociated with the design vehicle.
controlled road. Editor's note: The design vehicle to be considered Is the same as
the design vehicle set under the relevant local government
Planning schemes,
AND
A085,2 Any road access location Is designed to "4

 

 

 

State Development Assesemant Provisions
22 November 2013 V1.1

Module 19 — State transport network functionality

19.1 Access to state-controlled roads state code
Page 2 of 4

Page 3

Performance outcomes

2S
accommodate the forecast volume of venicie movements
In the peak periods of operation or conducting the
proposed use of the premises.

AND

    
  

 

AOQS5.3 Any road access location is designed to
accommodate 10 year traffic growth past completion of
the final stage of development.

AND

 

AO5.4 Any roed access location, for an urban activity, Is
designed in accordance with the relevant local
government standards or JPWEAQ R-050, R-051 and R-
053 drawings.

AND

 

 

AGS5.5 Any road access location for all other uses other
than urban activities is designed in accordanca with
Volume 3, parts 4 and 4A of the Road planning and
design manual, 2™ edition, Department of Transport and
Main Roads, 2013.

 

 

  

 

 

POS Tuming movements for vahicles

‘AO6.1 The road access location provides for left in and

 

 

 

 

 

 

N/A
entering and exiting the premises via the | left out tuning movements only.
road access location maintain the safety | anp
and efficiency of the state-controlled
A06.2 Internal manoeuvring areas on the premises are NIA
designed so the design vehicle can enter and leave the
premises in a forward gear.
Editor's note: The design vehicle to be considered is the same ag
the design vehicia set under the relevant local government
Planning scheme.
PO? On-site circulation is suitably 07.1 Provision of on-site vehicular manoeuvring space NIA
designed to accommodate the design §s provided to ensura the flow of traffic on the state-
vehicle associated with the proposed controlied road Is not compromised by an overflow of
land use, In order to angure that there Is | traffic queuing to access the site in accordance with
No impact on the safety and efficiency of AS2890—Parking facilities.
the state-controlled road. AND
AQ7.2 Mitigation measures are provided to ensure that NIA

 

State Development Assaasment Provisions
22 November 2013 V1.1

Module 19 — State transport network functionality

 

 

19.1 Access to state-controlled roads state code

Page 4

  

the flow of traffic on the state-contoiied road is not
disturbed by traffic queuiny to access the site.

 

 

 

 

PO8 Any proposed temporary road
access locations ensure that the eafety
and efficiency of the state-controlled road
is meintained.

Editor's note: Temporary road access
lovations may be condiffoned to ensure the
temporary nature of the access. Where
appropiate, use of the temporary access may
be restricted to the approved type and number
Of vehicles, and the times the temporary
access is able to ba used will also be limited.

No acceptable outcome Is prescribed,

 

 

 

 

 

POS Development having road access to

a local road within 100 metres of an
Intersection with a state-contratied road
maintains the safety and efficlency of the
state-controlled road.

 
 

located as far as possible irom where the road Intersects
with the state-controlled road and does not compromise
the existing operation or any future upgrades to the
intersection or state-controlled road.

AND

 

08.2 The road access location to the local road network
is In accordance with Volume 3, paris 4 and 4A of the
Road planning and design manual, 2™ edition,
Department of Transport and Main Roads, 2013, and Is
based on the volume of traffic and speed design of both
the local road and intersecting state-controlled road for a
period cf 10 years past completion of the final stage of
development.

AND

 

 

 

AO9.3 Vehicular access to the local read and internal
vehicle circulation is designed to remove or minimise the
potential for vehicles entering the site to queue in the
intersection with the state-controlled road or along the
state-controlled road itself.

 

State Development Assessment Provisions
22 November 2013 V1.1

Module 19 — State transport network functionality

 

 

 

18.1 Access to state-controlled roads state code

Page 5

19.3 Transport infrastructure and network design state code

 

 

zi Eps

 

Response column key:
@ Achieved
P/S Performance solution
NIA Not applicable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PO1 Development does not compromise | AO1.1 Any impact from the development on the safe and N/A The proposed development works do not impact on the
the safe and efficient management or efficient management and operation of the state transport management or operation of state transport infrastructure.
operation of state transport Infrastructure | corridor or transport network is identified and mitigated.
or transport networks,
Edltor’s note: A traffic impact assessment will assist in
addressing this accaptable outcome, A traffic Impact assessment
should idenéify any upgrade works required to mitigate Impacts
on the safe and efficient management and operation of the state
transport conidor.
PO2 Development does not compromisa | AQ2.1 Written advice has been provided by DTMR thst NA
planned upgrades to state transport thare are no planned upgrades of state transport
infrastructure or the development of infrastructure or future state transport corridore which will
future state transport Infrastructure In be compromised by the development.
future state transport corridors. OR both of tite following acceptable outcomes apply
02.2 The layout and design of the proposed a The proposed development works do not Impact on the
development accommodates planned upgrades to delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state
adjacent state transport Infrastructure in the stata transport corridors,
transport corridor.
AND
AO2.3 The layout and design of the development does w ‘The proposed development works de not Impact on the
not compromise the delivery of state transport delivery of state transport infrastructure in future state
Infrastructure in future state tranaport comidors. transport corridors.
Editor's note: A traffic impact assesament will assist In
addressing this acceptable outcome.
Pup ilew ies ; v =>
PO3 Development does not compromise | AQ3.1 Any Impact from the development on the safe and N/A The proposed development works do not compromise the
the safe and efficent management or efficient management and operation of the state- safe and efficient management or operation of state
operation of state-controlled roads. controlled road is identified and mitigated. transport infrastructure in future state transport corridors.
Editor's note: A traffic impact assessment will | Editor's note: A trafilc Impact assessment will assiet in
aeelst In addressing this parformance addressing this acceptable outcome.
outcome. :
PO4 Development does not compromise | AO4.1 Written advice has been provided by DTMR that NIA

 

 

 

lanned upgrades of the state-controlled

State Development Assessment Provicions
22 November 2013 V1.1

 

there are no planned upgrades of state-controlled roads

 

 

 

Module 18 — State transport network functionality

19.3 Transport Infrastructure and network design state code
Page 1 of 2

Page 6

 

   

Performance outcomes

| road network or delivery of tuure state-
controlled roads.

Acceptable outcomes

or future state-coniroiied roads which will ba compromised
by the development,

OR

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

‘AQ4.2 Any Impact from the development doas not a ‘The proposed development works do not impact on the
compromise planned upgrades of the state-controlled delivery of state transport infrastructure or future upgrades
road network or the delivary of future state-controlled of the state-controlled road network,
roads.
Editor's note: A traffic impact essessment will assist In
eddressing thia acceptable outcome.
POS Upgrade works on, of associated AO5.1 Upgrade works for the development are consistent NYA No upgrade works proposed.
with, the state-controlled road network with the requirements of the Roed planning and design
are undertaken in accordance with manual, 2" edition, Department of Transport and Main
applicable standards. Roads, 2043.
AND
05.2 The design and staging of upgrade works on or NIA Ne upgrade works proposed.
associated with the state-controlied road network are
consistent with planned upgrades.
PO6 Development does not impose 06.1 New roads proposed as part of the development NIA No new roads proposed. Development includes Internal
traffic loadings on the state-controlled are consistent with the road hlerarchy adopted by the access driveways only.
foad network which could be relevant local government, and new lower order roads do
accommodated on the local read not connect directly to a state-controlled road.
network, AND
06.2 Where the opportunity is avaliable, development NIA

provides for road access locations to lower order raads,
AND

 

 

A0O6.3 Where possible, the layout and design of the
development encourages traffic generated by the
development to use lower order roads.

 

 

 

N/A

 

 

‘State Development Assessment Provisions
22 November 2013 V1.1

Module 19 — State transport network functionality

19.3 Transport infrastructure and network design state code
Page 2 of 2

 

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.