Skip to the record
The only place to find full transcripts.

Council archive · source document

PA2906-Coastal Hazard Assessment-R1 · MCU21/0212

of 69

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Very large file (15.1 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

                                                 Internal use only




induced erosion predicted by Vellinga (1983). The Department provides the following recommendation in
relation to defining a storm event:

          “For a tide-dominated coast where storm tide levels can be large, the parameters
          adopted for the minimum design storm are:
                 storm tide level corresponding to an average recurrence interval of 1-in-
                  100 years
                 wave height for a moderate storm using the 1-in-20-year significant wave
                  height (Hs).

          However, for wave-dominated coastlines where extreme storm tide levels can be
          relatively minor, such as the Gold Coast, the significant wave height and duration
          of the storm event are major factors influencing short term erosion, rather than
          storm tide. Hence it may be necessary to consider a larger wave event (for
          example, a storm event with a 1-in-100 ARI) and a moderate storm tide level.
          Decisions on appropriate parameters to be used must be based on local
          conditions and the experience of the coastal engineer undertaking the
          assessment.”




Figure 15 Sketch of pre-storm and predicted post-storm profiles based on Vellinga (1983)


In relation to the probability of such an event occurring the Department of Environment and Heritage
protection (2013) states:

         “Although the abovementioned probability of occurrence may appear to be fairly
         high, it is considered that this choice is reasonable when considered in
         conjunction with the method used to determine erosion prone area widths. This
         method implies that the erosion prone area has sufficient width to accommodate
         the design storm erosion in 100 years’ time, when all of the estimated long-term
         erosion has occurred. Therefore, it also follows that for much of the 100-year
         planning period, the erosion prone area is sufficient to accommodate a larger
         storm than the one selected for design purposes. In fact, in the most critical last

15 October 2021       66 SEAVIEW TERRACE, SUNSHINE BEACH                          PA2906-RHD-ZZ-XX-RP-Z-0001   22

Used in these records

About this file

File size
15.1 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

PA2906-Coastal Hazard Assessment-R1.pdf · 15.1 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.