Council archive · source document
PM Submission - Paul Noonan - MCU25/0118
2) Poor proximity to essential services.
Section 6.3.1 - The proposed development is actually not close to the Cooroy township. It
could almost not be further from the Cooroy township and still be in the urban footprint. I
believe the original application for C2B’s State Govt grant was misleading about the site’s
proximity to essential community services.
The proposed dwellings are not “located close to activity centres, with ease of access to
public and active transport networks.”
It is significantly longer than a 1km walk to essential services in Cooroy. C2B appear to have
been opportunistically inaccurate to justify (it’s) State housing grant application.
Destinations from 64 LMD Distance in km Walk time in minutes
Cooroy State School 700m 13
Cooroy Post Office 1.5 21
Cooroy Radiology 1.5 21
Cooroy Post Office 1.5 21
Cooroy Original IGA 1.5 25
Cooroy Family Medical 1.5 22
Cooroy Library 1.5 21
Cooroy Adventure Playground 1.5 21
Cooroy Hotel 1.6 22
Cooroy RSL 1.4 20
Cooroy Maple Street Surgery 1.7 25
Tewantin Road Bus stop 1.4 21
Cooroy Railway Station 1.2 16
Cooroy Police Station 1.6 22
ExGoogle Maps Distance calculator
This table above shows that Section 3.7 of the Planning Report is misleading because the site
is NOT “located close to key services offered within the Cooroy Town Centre”.
2
Document Set ID: 24329288
Version: 1, Version Date: 24/11/2025
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
PM Submission - Paul Noonan - MCU25/0118Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 739 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.