Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Original source · versioned page text

SUPERSEDED Negotiated Decision Notice REC17 0011

of 1

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Officer:	Patrick Murphy
Direct Telephone:	61753296436
Our Reference:	REC17/0011
Your Reference:	60500

16 February 2018

Eagle Rise Developments Pty Ltd
C/- Murray & Associates (Qld) Pty Ltd
PO Box 246
NAMBOUR  QLD  4560

Dear Sir/Madam

Negotiated Decision Notice
Sustainable Planning Act 2009
I refer to your application and the representations you made in respect to the decision notice. On 15 February 2018 Council decided your representations.
Details of the decision are as follows:
application details
Application No:	REC17/0011
Street Address:	29 & 35A Tait St Tewantin, 14 & 20 Eagle Dive Tewantin
Real Property Description:	Lot 3 RP 149498 Lot 31 RP 149497 Lot 6 RP 149498 Lot 10 SP 241386
Planning Scheme:	The Noosa Plan (28 October 2016)
Decision details
Council on 16 November 2017 decided to issue the following type of approval:
Development Permit to Reconfigure a Lot - 2 Lots into 21 Lots
In relation to representations, Council on 15 February 2018 decided to:
A.	Agree to amend conditions 2 and 15d.
B.	Agree to delete condition 23b.
C.	Refuse to delete or amend conditions 3, 7, 13, 20, 21, and 22 and offset the Infrastructure charges payable for the development.
Relevant period of approval
The relevant period for this development approval is 4 years starting the day that this development approval takes effect.
assessment manager conditions
PLANNING
When Conditions Must Be Complied With
Unless otherwise stated, all works required by the conditions of this Decision Notice must be completed prior to submission of the subdivision plan to Council for plan sealing.
Approved Plans
Development undertaken in accordance with this approval must generally comply with the approved plans of development. The approved plans are listed in the following table unless otherwise amended by these conditions.
Plan No.	Rev.	Plan/Document Name	Date
1702	B	Eagle Drive – Tewantin Detailed Lot Layout prepared by Haynes Consulting Engineers	12.12.2017
The north-eastern corner of proposed Lot 15 and the south-eastern corner of proposed Lot 12 must be truncated to provide a minimum 3.5m wide verge from the new kerb line. The truncations must be created with 3 chords.
New Road
The new road (extension of Eagle Drive) shown on the Approved Plans must be constructed in accordance with the conditions of this Decision Notice and dedicated as road reserve at no cost to Council.
The works must be undertaken in accordance with an Operational Works approval and must include in particular:
an “access” road in accordance with Council’s Planning Scheme Policy 5 – Engineer Design Standards – Roads, Drainage and Earthworks (reserve width of 15 metres minimum and a carriageway width of 6 metres kerb to kerb)
sealing, drainage, kerbing and channelling
construction of pedestrian footpaths as shown on the approved plans
installation of street lighting
The new road must terminate in a cul-de-sac with a circular turning area of sufficient size to accommodate the single forward motion turn of a Waste Collection Vehicle (WCV) clear of private driveways on-street parking and speed control devices or if the adjoining property to the east (No 28 Elkhorn Drive - Lot 70 M37807) has been developed the “access” road formation must extend to and match smoothly with the existing formation within Lot 70 M37807, whichever is applicable at the time of construction.
External Works
Access to proposed Lots 7 and 8 must be from the Road 86419 frontage only (northern boundary) and the approved plans amended accordingly. The works must be undertaken in accordance with an Operational Works approval and must be constructed prior to the sealing of the survey plan.  The works must include in particular:
a half road construction consisting of 3m wide seal, kerbing and channelling and  extending from the Tait Street formation for a distance of 40 metres from Tait Street (western boundary of Lot 6) terminating in a temporary turnaround;
the intersection with Tait Street;
the northern half of the new road constructed with a gravel formation;
the realignment of the existing vehicle track to join to the end of the southern half of the new road;
the removal of the redundant sections of the existing vehicle track and the areas turfed or grass seeded;
the construction of the vehicle access to proposed Lots 7 and 8.
Stormwater Quantity
The new stormwater works must be constructed in accordance with the approved plans and the works must be undertaken in accordance with an Operational Works approval.
The stormwater elements of the development, including the basin at 14 Eagle Drive, are to be built in accordance with the BSM stormwater report Detailed Design of Stormwater Detention Volume dated 18.09.2017, letter from BSM dated 13.10.2017, letter from Haynes Consulting Engineers dated 11.10.2017 and accompanying plans. Where design elements will be finalised at a later stage, these will be in accordance with the relevant codes, standards, guidelines and Council’s requirements.
All basin retaining structures are to be structurally certified to Council’s design life as part of operational works design and certification is to be provided to Council prior to plan sealing.
Appropriate protection will be provided against scour at basin inflow and outflow points.
Stormwater Quality
Prior to Council accepting water quality treatment device assets “Off Maintenance”, the applicant must provide Council with a Schedule of Maintenance Costs for all activities undertaken to maintain the bio retention basins in accordance with the most current version of Healthy Waterways Bio-retention Basin Maintaining Vegetated Stormwater Assets Guidelines. The schedule shall include records of actual costs of maintenance work undertaken.
Vegetation
Existing native trees on the site and in the road verge must be retained in accordance with an Arborist Report for the development and referenced in a Development Permit for Operational Works. The existing native trees to be retained must be located clear of proposed services, not present a nuisance to neighbouring properties and generally suitable for the proposed location.
Vegetation must only be removed or disturbed in accordance with a Fauna Management Plan (or part thereof) and endorsed through an Operational Works approval.
Landscaping Works
The development site must be landscaped. The works must be undertaken in accordance with an Operational Works approval and the Noosa Plan for that specific area and must include in particular:
Provision of 1 native street tree within the road reserve for every 8 metres of new road.
100mm deep mulching and landscaping to any batter within road reserves that exceed 1 in 4 slope (25%).
Turf and garden beds to road reserve, including retained trees.
Retaining walls within the bio-basin must be constructed or permanently faced with grouted rock or materials which provide for a natural appearance such as sandstone, bluestone, granite or the like.
Removal of all weeds species listed in the following standards and legislation.
3.4.1. declared plants under the Land Protection (Pest and Stock Route Management) Act 2002 and sub-ordinate Regulation 2003.
3.4.2.The Noosa Local Government Area Pest Management Plan 2015-2019
All landscape works must be established and maintained in accordance with horticultural best practice with construction techniques that allow for healthy, sustained and vigorous plant growth. All plant material must be allowed to grow to full form.
All entry statements, fences, batters, retaining walls and buffer/screen plantings must be located entirely within private land and not within the public road reserve.
All landscape works must be maintained generally in accordance with the approved design for the life of the development.
Estate Entrance Feature
Any proposed estate entrance feature must:
reflect a subdued local character, rather than an overbearing or contrived statement
comprise feature vegetation (either existing or planted) in preference to built forms
integrate with the landscape design of the balance of the estate
be constructed of durable and low maintenance materials
be treated with a graffiti resistant coating
not restrict pedestrian access
Any estate entrance works must be undertaken in accordance with an Operational Works approval.
Property Access and Driveways
A residential driveway must be constructed to each lot. The works must be undertaken in accordance with an Operational Works approval.
The access driveways to service Lots 20 and 21 must extend for the full length of the access handle. The works must be undertaken in accordance with an Operational Works approval.
Vehicle access to Lots 7 & 8 are limited to the Road 86419 frontage only (northern boundary).  A clause must be included in the contract of sale for Lots 7 & 8 which prohibits vehicle access being taken from Eagle Drive.
Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities
Pedestrian and bicycle facilities must be provided for the development. The works must be undertaken in accordance with an Operational Works approval and must include in particular:
A 2 metre wide footpath within the road verge for the entire length shown on the approved plans.
Deleted.
Electricity and Telecommunication Services
Underground reticulated electricity and telecommunication services must be provided to each lot in accordance with an approval for Operational Works and the standards and requirements of the relevant service provider.
Unless otherwise stipulated by telecommunications legislation at the time of construction, the development must be provided with all necessary conduits, pits and pipes to accommodate the future connection of optic fibre technology telecommunications.
Certification must be submitted to Council from all relevant service providers which certifies that the development has met the requirements of this Decision Notice and all applicable legislation at the time of construction.
Easements
A minimum 1.5 metre wide easement for drainage purposes must be registered against the title/s of the burdened properties in favour of the benefitted properties over the proposed easements identified on the Approved Plans. The easements must of sufficient width to wholly encompass the drainage structures and the associated overland flowpaths.
An easement for access and service purposes must be registered against the titles of proposed Lot 21 in favour of proposed Lot 20
Unless otherwise agreed in writing by the relevant service provider, any public or third party infrastructure located on the subject site must be placed within an easement registered against the title of the property.
All easements must be designed in accordance with the planning scheme and granted at no cost to the Grantee. Where the Grantee is Council or a service authority, the easement documentation must be in accordance with the Grantee’s standard easement terms. Draft easement documentation must be submitted to Council for endorsement.
All works must be kept clear of any existing or proposed easements on the subject land, unless agreed otherwise in writing by the Grantee.
Earthworks and Retaining Walls
All fill and associated batters must be undertaken in accordance with an Operational Works approval, and contained entirely within the subject site unless written permission from the respective landowner(s) is provided to Council.
All fill and associated batters must be contained entirely within the subject site unless written permission from the respective landowner(s) is provided to Council. All earthworks must be undertaken in accordance with the provisions of Australian Standard AS3798: Guidelines on Earthworks for Commercial and Residential Developments.
referral agencies
Not Applicable
Advisory notes
The following notes are included for guidance and information purposes only and do not form part of the assessment manager conditions:
Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003
There may be a requirement to establish a Cultural Heritage Management Plan and/or obtain approvals pursuant to the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Act 2003 (ACH Act). The ACH Act establishes a cultural heritage duty of care which provides that: “A person who carries out an activity must take all reasonable and practicable measures to ensure the activity does not harm Aboriginal cultural heritage”. It is an offence to fail to comply with the duty of care. Substantial monetary penalties may apply to individuals or corporations breaching this duty of care. Injunctions may also be issued by the Land and Resources Tribunal, and the Minister administering the ACH Act can also issue stop orders for an activity that is harming or is likely to harm Aboriginal cultural heritage or the cultural heritage value of Aboriginal cultural heritage.
You should contact the Cultural Heritage Unit on 07 3247 6212 to discuss any obligations under the ACH Act.
Building and Construction Industry (Portable Long Service Leave) Levy
The QLeave levy must be paid prior to the issue of a development permit where it is required. Council will not be able to issue a Decision Notice without receipt of details that the Levy has been paid. QLeave contact: 1800 803 481 (free call) or (07) 3212 6855.
Co-ordination of Operational Works Assessment
Additional application fees apply to Operational Work applications where the different aspects of the works are lodged separately. Significant savings in application fees will result if all works are lodged in a single application.
Preparation of a Preliminary Construction Management Plan
A preliminary Construction Management Plan must be submitted with the Operational Works application and must address the following:
appropriate traffic signage in accordance with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD)
provision for safe pedestrian access across the frontage of the site both during daily construction and after daily construction has ceased.
Infrastructure Charges
This Development Permit will trigger an “Infrastructure Charge Notice” to be issued in accordance with Council’s “Charges Resolution” made pursuant to the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 and in conjunction with the State Planning Regulatory Provision (Adopted Charges).
property notes
Not Applicable
further development permits required
Development Permit for Operational Works (Landscaping, Roads, Footpaths, Stormwater and Electrical)
self assessable codes
Not Applicable
submissions
Not Applicable
reasons/grounds for approval
Not Applicable
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
You are entitled to appeal against this decision. A copy of the relevant appeal provisions from the Sustainable Planning Act 2009 is attached.
During the appeal period, you as the applicant may suspend your appeal period and make written representations to Council about the conditions contained within the development approval. If Council agrees or agrees in part with the representations, a “negotiated decision notice” will be issued. Only one “negotiated decision notice” may be given. Taking this step will defer your appeal period, which will commence again from the start the day after you receive a “negotiated decision notice”. (Refer to Part 8 “Dealing with decision notices and approvals” - Division 1 “Changing decision notices and approvals during applicant’s appeal period” of the Sustainable Planning Act 2009.)
OTHER DETAILS
If you wish to obtain more information about Council’s decision, electronic copies are available on line at www.noosa.qld.gov.au, or at Council Offices.
Yours faithfully

Kerri Coyle
Manager, Development Assessment

cc	Unitywater

Enc:	Negotiated Infrastructure Charge Notice
Approved Plans/Documents
Appeal Rights

	Appeal Rights SUSTAINABLE PLANNING ACT 2009 & SUSTAINABLE PLANNING REGULATION 2009

The following is an extract from the Sustainable Planning Act 2009  (Chapter 7).
MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE, RECONFIGURING A LOT & OPERATIONAL WORKS

Division 8 	Appeals to court relating to development applications and approvals

461 	Appeals by applicants
(1) 	An applicant for a development application may appeal to the court against any of the following—
(a) 	the refusal, or the refusal in part, of the development application;
(b) 	any condition of a development approval, another matter stated in a development approval and the identification or inclusion of a code under section 242;
(c) 	the decision to give a preliminary approval when a development permit was applied for;
(d) 	the length of a period mentioned in section 341;
(e) 	a deemed refusal of the development application.
(2) 	An appeal under subsection (1)(a), (b), (c) or (d) must be started within 20 business days (the applicant’s appeal period) after—
(a) 	if a decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given—the day the decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given to the applicant; or
(b) 	otherwise—the day a decision notice was required to be given to the applicant.
(3) 	An appeal under subsection (1)(e) may be started at any time after the last day a decision on the matter should have been made.

462 	Appeals by submitters—general
(1) 	A submitter for a development application may appeal to the court only against—
(a) 	the part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision about any part of the application requiring impact assessment under section 314; or
(b) 	the part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision under section 327.
(2) 	To the extent an appeal may be made under subsection (1), the appeal may be against 1 or more of the following—
(a) 	the giving of a development approval;
(b) 	any provision of the approval including—
(i) 	a condition of, or lack of condition for, the approval; or
(ii) 	the length of a period mentioned in section 341 for the approval.
(3) 	However, a submitter may not appeal if the submitter—
(a) 	withdraws the submission before the application is decided; or
(b) 	has given the assessment manager a notice under section 339(1)(b)(ii).
(4) 	The appeal must be started within 20 business days (the submitter’s appeal period) after the decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given to the submitter.

463 	Additional and extended appeal rights for submitters for particular development applications
(1) 	This section applies to a development application to which chapter 9, part 7 applies.
(2) 	A submitter of a properly made submission for the application may appeal to the court about a referral agency’s response made by a prescribed concurrence agency for the application.
(3) 	However, the submitter may only appeal against a referral agency’s response to the extent it relates to—
(a) 	if the prescribed concurrence agency is the chief executive (environment)—development for an aquacultural ERA; or
(b) 	if the prescribed concurrence agency is the chief executive (fisheries)—development that is—
(i) 	a material change of use of premises for aquaculture; or
(ii) 	operational work that is the removal, damage or destruction of a marine plant.
(4) 	Despite section 462(1), the submitter may appeal against the following matters for the application even if the matters relate to code assessment—
(a) 	a decision about a matter mentioned in section 462(2) if it is a decision of the chief executive (fisheries);
(b) 	a referral agency’s response mentioned in subsection (2).

464 	Appeals by advice agency submitters
(1) 	Subsection (2) applies if an advice agency, in its response for an application, told the assessment manager to treat the response as a properly made submission.
(2) 	The advice agency may, within the limits of its jurisdiction, appeal to the court about—
(a) 	any part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision about any part of the application requiring impact assessment under section 314; or
(b) 	any part of the approval relating to the assessment manager’s decision under section 327.
(3) 	The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the decision notice or negotiated decision notice is given to the advice agency as a submitter.
(4) 	However, if the advice agency has given the assessment manager a notice under section 339(1)(b)(ii), the advice agency may not appeal the decision.

465 	Appeals about decisions relating to extensions for approvals
(1) 	For a development approval given for a development application, a person to whom a notice is given under section 389, other than a notice for a decision under section 386(2), may appeal to the court against the decision in the notice.
(2) 	The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the notice of the decision is given to the person.
(3) 	Also, a person who has made a request under section 383 may appeal to the court against a deemed refusal of the request.
(4)	An appeal under subsection (3) may be started at any time after the last day the decision on the matter should have been made.

466 	Appeals about decisions relating to permissible changes
(1) 	For a development approval given for a development application, the following persons may appeal to the court against a decision on a request to make a permissible change to the approval—
(a) 	if the responsible entity for making the change is the assessment manager for the application—
(i) 	the person who made the request; or
(ii) 	an entity that gave a notice under section 373 or a pre-request response notice about the request;
(b) 	if the responsible entity for making the change is a concurrence agency for the application—the person who made the request.
(2) 	The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the person is given notice of the decision on the request under section 376.
(3) 	Also, a person who has made a request under section 369 may appeal to the court against a deemed refusal of the request.
(4)	An appeal under subsection (3) may be started at any time after the last day the decision on the matter should have been made.

467 	Appeals about changing or cancelling conditions imposed by assessment manager or concurrence agency
(1) 	A person to whom a notice under section 378(9)(b) giving a decision to change or cancel a condition of a development approval has been given may appeal to the court against the decision in the notice.
(2) 	The appeal must be started within 20 business days after the day the notice of the decision is given to the person.

[word/footer1.xml]
PD-DA-FM387/1-13/04/2010	Page 10 of 3

[word/footer2.xml]
PO Box 141		P. (07) 5329 6500	[email protected]	
	TEWANTIN  QLD  4565	F. (07) 5329 6501	www.noosa.qld.gov.au
				Page 1 of 9

[word/footer3.xml]
Page 7 of 9

[word/footer4.xml]
PD-DA-FM387/1-13/04/2010	Page 1 of 3

[word/header3.xml]
REC17/0011

[Attachment: image3.png (image text)]
K Coy fs


[Attachment: image4.png (image text)]
 
 
 

 
 
 

a
mm

  

NOOSA
COUNCIL
Log in to download the original file

SUPERSEDED Negotiated Decision Notice REC17 0011.docx · 141 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.