Skip to the record
Noosa’s premier civic archive.

Council archive · source document

Request for Further Information - 010.2007.00002606.001 [As Published] · 132007.2606

of 2

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

                                                           Duncan Thompson, 07 5449 5175
                                                           Email: [email protected]
                                                           Application Ref: 2007/2606




29 January 2008


Andrew Fryer
Ark Projects Pty Ltd
PO Box 1100
COOLUM BEACH QLD 4573




Dear Andrew,

Re: Application for a Development Permit for 07/2606 Detached House situated
    at 16 Seahorse Place NOOSAVILLE described as LOT: 344 RP: 895073

I refer to the above application and wish to advise that following preliminary
examination of the plans it has been determined that the proposal does not meet
Specific Outcome O1 of the Detached House Code with respect to setbacks. The
following information is therefore required to be submitted:-
1.      Amended plans and/or supporting information that demonstrate that the proposal
        meets the Specific Outcomes or Probable Solutions of the Detached House Code
        described below.
                    column 1                                              column 2
                Specific Outcomes                          Acceptable solutions (if self-assessable)
                                                           Probable solutions (if code assessable)
14.65 Siting

Setbacks
                                                       S1.1 The minimum setback of the Detached house
O1 Buildings and other structures are appropriately
                                                       or dwelling unit and associated buildings and
designed and sited to-
                                                       structures from boundaries is not less than the
                                                       minimum      specified   in   Schedule      1;   or
a) provide amenity for users of the premises as well
                                                       S1.2 Where there is a conflict between boundary
as preserve the visual and acoustic privacy of
                                                       setbacks in Schedule 1, the greater of the setbacks
adjoining and nearby land uses;
b) preserve any existing vegetation that will buffer   prevails;
the proposed building from adjoining uses;
                                                       AND
c) allow for landscaping to be provided between
buildings; and
                                                       S1.3 If there are no applicable setbacks shown in
d) maintain the visual continuity and pattern of
                                                       Schedule 1, the siting provisions of Part 11 or 12 of
buildings and landscape elements within the street.
                                                       the Queensland Development Code apply.
SBR alternative provision to QDC Parts 11 and
12, P1, P2 and P7                                      SBR alternative provision to QDC Parts 11 and
                                                       12, A1, A2 and A7



Please provide 4 copies of all information that you are providing. In addition, it would
assist Council if you could also provide an electronic copy of your response.



     Award Winner - Australian Clean Beach
       Challenge 2004 Litter Prevention
Full text of the other 1 page

Page 2

Please be aware that under Section 3.2.12 of the Integrated Planning Act, the applicant
is to respond to any information request within 12 months of the request or otherwise,
the application lapses.
Under the provisions of the Integrated Planning Act 1997, you as the applicant, have
three options available in response to this Information Request. You may give the
assessment manager (in this instance Council) and each referral agency (if any):-

1.      all of the information requested; or

2.      part of the information requested together with a letter asking the assessment
        manager and each referral agency to proceed with the assessment of the
        application; or

3.      a letter:-

        3.1. stating that you do not intend to supply any of the information requested;
             and

        3.2. asking the assessment manager and each referral agency to proceed with
             the assessment of the application.
The above information is required to be submitted, prior to assessment of the
application. If any further matters arise as part of assessment of this application, you
will be advised accordingly.

Please find attached a copy of Part 12 of the Queensland Development Code relating
to the design and siting of detached housing that also may be of assistance to you.
Should you have any further queries in relation to the above, please do not hesitate to
contact Duncan Thompson on the above number.

Yours faithfully,



Daniel Smith
ASSISTANT PLANNING OFFICER




     Award Winner - Australian Clean Beach
       Challenge 2004 Litter Prevention

Used in these records

About this file

File size
13 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Request for Further Information - 010.2007.00002606.001 [As Published].pdf · 13 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.