Original source · versioned page text
response to information request.pdf
9 December 2021 Lisa Pienaar Noosa Council [email protected] RE: Response to Information Request MCU21/0156 – 89, 91 & 93 Eumundi Noosa Rd, Noosaville Council issued an information request on 29 October 2021. The applicant provides the following additional information in response to the items: 1. Provide amended plans (to scale) that clearly details: a. all building setbacks relative to the boundaries for the ‘zoomed in’ floor plans. b. proposed R.L.s of the top of all roof lines. c. natural and finished ground surface levels. Include RL’s relating to fill levels. d. setback lines that scale correctly – ie. the 2 m setback on the northern boundary is a different distance from the 2m setback line at the southern boundaries. Scaling from the boundary distance provides different measures than what is annotated on the plans. e. renderings that reflect the actual site and surrounds. Choosing a reference point in on area does not correlate to the measurements in another. f. the western elevation of TH01 shows a car port, while the floor plans clearly show the western wall, including a garage. g. close up elevations are provided for some of the units, but not all. In particular provide close ups for dwellings TH18, TH19, APT21 & APT22. h. Provide GFA and site cover calculations. Please find updated proposal plan with notations included referencing the plan changes. The site cover and GFA calculations are included below demonstrating compliance with the 45% site cover requirement (proposed 41.6%) and 0.5:1 Plot Ratio (2,074.9m2 GFA). [OCR of page images] ww PIVOTAL 9 December 2021 Lisa Pienaar Noosa Council [email protected] RE: _ Response to Information Request MCU21/0156 — 89, 91 & 93 Eumundi Noosa Rd, Noosaville Council issued an information request on 29 October 2021. The applicant provides the following additional information in response to the items: 1. Provide amended plans (to scale) that clearly details: a. b. c. h. all building setbacks relative to the boundaries for the ‘zoomed in’ floor plans. proposed R.L.s of the top of all roof lines. natural and finished ground surface levels. Include RL’s relating to fill levels. setback lines that scale correctly — ie. the 2m setback on the northern boundary is a different distance from the 2m setback line at the southern boundaries. Scaling from the boundary distance provides different measures than what is annotated on the plans. renderings that reflect the actual site and surrounds. Choosing a reference point in on area does not correlate to the measurements in another. the western elevation of TH01 shows a car port, while the floor plans clearly show the western wall, including a garage. close up elevations are provided for some of the units, but not all. In particular provide close ups for dwellings TH18, TH19, APT21 & APT22. Provide GFA and site cover calculations. Please find updated proposal plan with notations included referencing the plan changes. The site cover and GFA calculations are included below demonstrating compliance with the 45% site cover requirement (proposed 41.6%) and 0.5:1 Plot Ratio (2,074.9m? GFA). SITE COVER AREA PLOT RATIO indi Noosa Road Townhouse: Typology GFA (m2) a Type A 94 8 3 TY TOTAL (m2) 194 Type At 97 Type 8 1148 3444 Type C 92.9 371.6 Type D 678 2 135.6 Type E 7 2 154 Type F 123.3 1 123.3 22 2074.9 Site Area= 4151m2 Total permitted plot ratio (Small Dwellings)= _ [0.5 to 1.0 Proposed plot ratio (Small Dwellings) = [0.50 1.0 Small Dwelli (Other Dwellings= |
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewLog in to download the original (response to information request.pdf)
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.