Original source · versioned page text
Council Report - 132005.638.03 - OTHER CHANGE TO AN EXISTING APPROVAL FOR MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE - EXPANSION OF SPECIAL PURPOSE (WASTE DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING FACILITY) & ONGOING CLEARING PURPOSES AT 561 EUMUNDI NOOSA ROAD, DOONAN - Finale
Very large file: it may take a few minutes
The original of this document is very large (11.6 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Council’s independent ecologist has reviewed the applicant’s response and accepts the measures proposed to avoid long term net loss of ecologically important areas, subject to the offset ratio being adjusted to a 6:1 ratio in accordance with the provisions of the State Government Supported Infrastructure Koala Policy 2017. Edge effects PO3 (c) of the Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands code requires that the development incorporates siting and design measures to protect and retain ecological values and processes within or adjacent to the site. A site inspection of the surrounding environment indicates that there has been substantial degradation of adjacent bushland via weed incursion. Additional information was sought from the applicant to demonstrate compliance with PO3 (c) of the Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands Code. In response, the applicant has provided a revised proposal plan which includes a 5m wide grass buffer area which is intended to be maintained along the northeastern boundary for the full extent of the proposed resource recovery area. Considering the nature of the use and having no buildings proposed in this area, the applicant’s ecology consultant has advised that the buffer is wide enough to allow for adequate weed management. Furthermore, the applicant proposes to install signage along the perimeter boundary to assist with minimising edge effects by clearly delineating the operational use areas of the site. This response was considered acceptable by Council’s independent ecologist as means of satisfying PO3 (c). Wetlands PO6 of the Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands Code requires the protection of the biodiversity and ecosystem values of the waterways, wetlands and adjacent riparian zones. The adjacent paperbark open forest meets the definition of a wetland under the Department of Environment and Resource Management (2011) Queensland and delineation guideline, meaning it must be considered for assessment purposes. The applicant’s ecologist has addressed this performance outcome through their Flora and fauna assessment (Rev 4) submitted as part of its information response. Their revised response acknowledges the applicable wetlands, watercourse and riparian buffers to the proposed clearing. The response also notes the poor health of the wetland proposed to be cleared and that weed management will be applied to the balance vegetation and a 1.8ha environmental offset will be provided which includes a constructed riparian drainage line. Council’s independent ecologist has reviewed and is satisfied that the response adequately demonstrates compliance with PO6. Hydrology and ground water effects PO9 of the Biodiversity, Waterways and Wetlands code requires development to ensure natural surface water and ground water hydrological regimes of waterways, wetlands and hydrologically sensitive plant communities are not adversely impacted. The applicant’s ecologist has advised that they have undertaken an assessment of the flora and fauna communities on the site with respect to potential change to natural surface water and ground water hydraulic regimes, including advice from Dr Ed Meyer (an amphibian specialist). Council’s independent ecologist has reviewed the response and is satisfied that the applicant has adequately demonstrated compliance with PO9. Offsets and weed management PO10 of the Biodiversity, waterways and wetland code requires that ecologically important areas be restored and enhanced. The applicant’s proposed works include the implementation of a Weed Management Plan for Singapore daisy and other weed species. Additional information was required to gain a greater understanding the extent of treatment areas, which inherently influence the impact of mitigation measures relied upon to protect the adjacent sensitive habitat from existing and future edge effects.
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Very large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.