Council archive · source document
sdap-response-template-v1-6-10-1 · OPW15/0240
Attached to the e-mail OPW15/0240 - Operational Works Application.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________Callaghan & Toth Pty Ltd
Performance outcomes Acceptable outcomes Response Comment
development is an erosion control structure
(6) reduces the risk of shoreline erosion for areas
adjacent to the development footprint to the
maximum extent feasible in the case of erosion
control structures.
AND
AO5.2 Development in a storm tide inundation area is The directional drilling of the rising main means there are no
located, designed, constructed and operated to: impacts to mangroves, and very limited impacts to the
(1) maintain dune crest heights, or where a reduction in coastal ecosystems. The impact areas are the launch pit,
crest heights cannot be avoided, mitigate risks to connection pits and exit pits which will be rehabilitated with
development from wave overtopping and storm tide vegetation.
inundation The emergency works were such to limit impacts to the
(2) maintain or enhance coastal ecosystems and natural coastal ecosystems. The rising main was isolated quickly
features, such as mangroves and coastal wetlands, and sewage flows redirected away from the broken rising
between the development and tidal waters, where the main. Contaminated soil in Weyba Creek was removed and
coastal ecosystems and natural features protect or taken offsite.
buffer communities and infrastructure from sea-level
rise and impacts from storm tide inundation.
AND
AO5.3 Redevelopment of built structures in the erosion N/A N/A
prone area within a coastal management district:
(1) avoids intensifying the use of the premises, or
(2) demonstrates that any intensification of use will not
result in an increase in the need for erosion control
structures or riverbank hardening.
AND
AO5.4 Development that is coastal protection work N/A N/A
involves:
(1) beach nourishment undertaken in accordance with a
program of beach nourishment works that source
sediment of a suitable quality and type from outside
the active beach system, or
(2) the construction of an erosion control structure,
where it is demonstrated that installing an erosion
control structure is the only feasible option for
protecting permanent structures from coastal erosion
and those structures cannot be abandoned or
relocated in the event of coastal erosion occurring.
Editor’s note: Applications for coastal protection work should be
supported by a report certified by a Registered Professional
State development assessment provisions Module 10 — Coastal protection 10.1 Tidal works, or development in the coastal management district state code
6 July 2015 V1.6 Page 4 of 16
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
sdap-response-template-v1-6-10-1.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 271 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.