Original source · versioned page text
2018-03-06 Services & Organisation Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 6 MARCH 2018
Attachment 1
Page 48 of 79
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 6 MARCH 2018
Attachment 1
| ) | NOOSA Council Policy
ms mKeoees UTILITY SERVICES THROUGH
PUBLIC LAND TO SERVICE
Corporate Plan Reference: Long term planning for Noosa Shire
Endorsed by Council: <Insert Date of Ordinary Meeting >
Policy Author: Allan Hull, Civil Operations Manager
POLICY BACKGROUND y
There are instances where jetties and other marine based facilities that adjoin Council controlled
public land such as along the Noosa River foreshore’ have, or seek to have, connections to utilities
such as reticulated water, sewer and electricity.
The issues for Council include:
1. Where there is no lease or pefmit,to occupy under the State Land Act 1994, the utility
providers link the billing to the adjoining»Council property, Council then has no legal basis
for recovery of the charges and incurs administrative costs,in identifying and attempting to
recover the charges.
2. Where there is no registered title, there is no*means for Council to know the identity of the
lawful owner or whefh changes of ownership’ occur putting at risk its ability to recover charges
owing. ,
3. The risk associated with damage, loss or injury to a person or property rests with Council as
technically the property service line is owned by Council as it is within Council controlled land.
State Land is set aside for the benefit of the community. The provision of utility services through
State Land is secondary use of that Land. State Planning Policy “Secondary Use of Trust Land under
the Land Act” allows “essential” utility infrastructure provided it does not diminish the purpose and
amenity of the trust land. This usually requires a lease or formal arrangement such an easement
being put in place. State policy is that such easements are only provided for utility providers (not the
consumer). In any event it would not be practical to have 20 or more easements created over the
various separate titles covering Noosaville foreshore.
Having regard to the above it is recognised that:
a) There are historical Service connections to privately owned commercial jetties.
b) Commercial jetties have a lease from the State that results in a registered title permitting
billing direct to the lessee.
c) Commercial jetties have a legitimate need for service connections in order to conduct the
approved commercial operation.
d) State and Council policy is that no more commercial jetties will be approved along the Noosa
River thereby limiting the number of service connections through Council controlled land to
the existing arrangements.
e) No apparent warrant is evident that would justify the use of public land to provide utility
service connections to private jetties where any commercial activity whatsoever is expressly
not allowed. Provision of services also increases the risk of unapproved commercial activity
such as renting berthing places to occur.
Page 1
Page 48 of 79See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.