Original source · versioned page text
2014-03-25 Planning & Organisation Committee Agenda Pages 81-167
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
PLANNING & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 25 MARCH 2014
The following table provides a summary and assessment of the issues raised by submitters:
Issues Comments
Conflict with Plans / Need / Premature
The land is intended to remain for open space The development poses unacceptable
purposes and environmental purposes. conflicts with the rural, open space and
No other three storey developments have conservation intent for the site under the
been approved around lake. local planning schemes and insufficient
need exists to justify approval of the
Zoning on two of the three parcels of land is development.
“Open Space Conservation” which is one of
the highest levels of zoning protection under
the planning scheme.
Sufficient land supply within urban footprint.
Previous proposals rejected on environmental
grounds.
Decision should not be made until new Noosa
Council established.
The development would compete with and
potentially reduce the diversity of current
existing urban development in the region.
Unsuitable Land
The land is unsuitable for urban development as:- The land is highly constrained, supports
it is low lying, poorly drained and partly flood significant habitat and forms part of a
prone, and requires substantial earthworks; highly sensitive coastal lowland system.
The nature and intensity of the
it is affected by acid sulfate soils and these will development is not appropriate to its
be released into the environment as a result of setting and is likely to result in
the development; unacceptable environmental impacts.
it supports sensitive vegetation systems, and
the proposed vegetation clearing and
significant earthworks will have a dramatic
effect on these systems;
it lies within the highly sensitive Lake Weyba
catchment and Eenie Creek systems;
it is an important fish breeding area; and
successive planning instruments have
recognised the sensitivity of the catchment by
excluding all urban development apart from
that which is directly associated with Peregian
Beach.
Part of the site is one of only 2 UNESCO “Man
in the Biosphere” reserves in Queensland and
1 of 14 in Australia.
Page 148 of 231
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.