Council archive · source document
Annexure D TTM Traffic report · MCU17/0046
Attached to the e-mail IDAS Forms, cover letter & report, Annexure B,C,D,E,F MCU17/0046 & OPW17/0160.
Original PDF page 3, section 1. The text section number identifies this passage in the reader.
3. Proposed Development
The proposed development is a duplex. Each dwelling has two bedrooms, one single garage and one visitor
space. The Residence 1 garage and visitor parking space share a 6.0m wide driveway crossover to Park
Crescent. The Residence 2 garage and visitor parking space share a 7.3m wide driveway crossover to Park
Crescent. The driveway flares are generally designed in accordance with IPWEAQ drawing RS-049. The
driveways have 1.3m separation along the kerb. The parking spaces are designed in accordance with AS2890.1
requirements.
Development plans prepared by Nof Architects are provided in Attachment 1.
4. Access Design
Council requires that driveways are designed and located in accordance with AS/NZS2890.1:2004 and Council
standard drawings (IPWEAQ, drawings RS-049 and RS-050).
Table 1 identifies the requirements and provisions of the proposed driveway arrangements. Where
performance solutions are identified, further information is provided below.
Table 1: Design Requirements and Provisions, Noosa Shire Council
Design Aspect Council Requirement Proposed Provision Compliance
Distance from an intersection 6m (min) 30m+ Council Compliant
Distance from another driveway Not stated 1m (approximately) Council Compliant
Sight Distance Minimum 40m for a default 50m+ in each direction
Council Compliant
50kph speed (unsigned)
No. of driveways 1 (max) 2 Performance Solution
Design Type Duplex with frontage 20.0m or 2 x Double garage or carport
less on property boundary/Duplex Performance Solution
with frontage 20.0m or less
Residence 1 driveway:
- Width at property boundary 6.0m (max) 6.0m Council Compliant
- Narrowest section (W2) 4.0m 5.2m Performance Solution
- Width at kerb 5.0m (max) 6.2m Performance Solution
Width Residence 2 driveway:
- Width at property boundary 6.0m (max) 7.3m Performance Solution
- Narrowest section (W2) 4.0m 6.5m Performance Solution
- Width at kerb 5.0m (max) 7.2m Performance Solution
Table 1 shows that the access locations and distance from adjacent features are consistent with Council and
Australian Standard requirements. The number of driveways and driveway designs however are performance
solutions.
Number of Driveways
The subject site has a very steep grade. This means that significant structural works are required to provide
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Annexure D TTM Traffic report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
Annexure D TTM Traffic report.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.9 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.