Original source · versioned page text
SUPERSEDED Decision Notice - Council Meeting Decision MCU21 0110.pdf
2107-23530 SRA Attachment 2—Changed reasons for decision to impose conditions The reasons for this decision are: The development complies with State code 25: Development in South East Queensland koala habitat areas. Specifically, the proposed changes to the development: minimises the amount of interference with a Koala Habitat Area. Note: Interfering with koala habitat is defined under Schedule 24 of the Planning regulation 2017 as: (a) means removing, cutting down, ringbarking, pushing over, poisoning or destroying in any way, including by burning, fiooding or draining, native vegetation in a koala habitat area; but (b) does not include destroying standing vegetation by stock, or lopping a tree no longer involves the removal of Non- Juvenille Koala Habitat Trees within a Koala Habitat Area, requiring an environmental offset. through conditioning, will ensure that future exempted development clearing does not occur within the mapped Kosls Habitat Area and suitable canopy species for koala habitat and essential habitat is retained The development complies with State code 6: Protection of state transport networks. Specifically, the proposed changes to development: continues to provide safe and direct access to public passenger transport infrastructure, including access by cycling and walking does not compromise existing safe and direct access to public passenger transport infrastructure, including access by cycling and walking Findings on material questions of fact The subject site is mapped as containing koala habitat area (core koala habitat area, based on DES technical agency assessment the core koala habitat area is 0.19ha of the site). With regards to regulated vegetation, the site is mapped as containing: 0.19hs of Category B (remnant vegetation) area comprising of least concern RE 12.2.5 (Figure 3) (Vegetation Management Property Report); 3.62ha of non-remnant ares (Figure 3) (Vegetation Management Property Report): 0.19ha of essential habitat for the following species (Figure 4) (Vegetation Management Property Report): Crinia tinnula wallum froglet V; Litoria freycineti wallum rocketfrog V: e — Litoria olongburensis wallum sedgefrog V; Calyptorhynchus lathami glossy black-cockatoo V-; Phascolarctos cinereus koala V; and Acacia attenuate V; High risk area on the protected plants flora survey trigger map (Figure 5) (Vegetation Management Property Report). Evidence or other material on which the findings were based © development application material and submitted plans * State Development Assessment Provisions (version 3.0) * The Development Assessment Rules © Planning Act 2016 ® Planning Regulation 2017 * SARA DA Mapping system « State Planning Policy mapping system State Assessment and Referral Agency Page 8 of 9 Document Set ID: 23746767 Version: 6, Version Date: 22/05/2025 Page 25 of 53
Preview the original
The page text is free to read. Previews and downloads of original files need an account.
Log in to previewSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.