Council archive · source document
Appendix D - Code Assessment · RAL22/0006
1. in the Rural zone unless resultant lots have a suitable in this instance as it does not result in
minimum area of 100 hectares; fragmentation of rural land (given it is already
2. in the Environmental Management and fragmented by the road formation). With specific
Conservation zone; reference to Proposed Lot 1, the unconstrained
3. on Noosa North Shore; open area over the northern portion of the site
4. in the Low density residential zone at presents numerous opportunities to establish a
Cooroibah; dwelling house, effluent disposal area and
5. in the Low density residential zone vehicular access. As such, the proposed
where access is gained via: development is representative of a logical infill
subdivision that remains consistent with the
1. Noosa Banks Drive, Tewantin; character & amenity of the Rural Zone.
2. Golf Course Drive, Griffith Avenue
or Carramar Street, Tewantin;
3. Lake Entrance Boulevard,
Noosaville;
4. Lake Weyba Drive Noosaville,
south of Eenie Creek Road; or
5. Habitat Place, Noosa Heads;
6. within a Water Supply Buffer Area as shown
on Regional Infrastructure Overlay.
Lot areas and dimensions
PO5 AO5.1 Performance Solution:
New lots have areas and dimensions that: New lots are of a size and shape that can accommodate
the land uses intended by the zone. Table 9.5.1.4 – Minimum Lot Size stipulates that
1. are consistent with the purpose and overall the minimum lot size for newly created lots is
outcomes of the applicable zone or zones; AO5.2 100ha in the Rural Zone. Whilst it is acknowledged
2. are consistent with the size and character of In general, lots have a predominantly regular, that the Proposed Lots do not achieve this area,
surrounding lots; rectangular shape. due to the nature of the existing site layout, with
3. can accommodate land uses that are consistent Pender Creek Road traversing the site and
with the purpose and overall outcomes of the Editor's note-topographical constraints or separating the eastern portion from the balance
applicable zone; environmental values may call for irregular property allotment, the proposed subdivision is considered
4. allow for siting and construction of buildings, boundaries. suitable in this instance as it does not result in
structures, access ways and car parking while:- fragmentation of rural land (given it is already
1. retaining ecologically important AO5.3 fragmented by the road formation). With specific
areas and ecological linkages; In residential zones, lots are generally arranged so reference to Proposed Lot 1, the unconstrained
2. minimising risk of soil erosion, that: open area over the northern portion of the site
landslide, flooding and bushfire; presents numerous opportunities to establish a
1. there are no more than five lots with dwelling house, effluent disposal area and
3. minimising earthworks or
a frontage width of less than 15 metres vehicular access. As such, the proposed
retaining walls associated with
grouped in a row; development is representative of a logical infill
construction on sloping sites;
2. there are no more than three lots with subdivision that remains consistent with the
4. retaining the scenic amenity and
a frontage width of 7.5 metres or less in character & amenity of the Rural Zone.
vegetated character of the
a row unless serviced by a rear lane;
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Appendix D - Code Assessment.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 308 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.