Council archive · source document
PM Submission Object - Jan Romanowski - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041
From: Jan Chaseling
Sent: 24 Apr 2017 22:56:43 +1000
To: Mailbox Council Mail
Subject: Objection to the Scanlon Group Development Proposal
Attachments: Veggie Village Submission Scanlon Development.docx
Jan Romanowski
9 Landrail St
Peregian Beach 4573
Objection to the Scanlon Group Development Proposal
Attention: Patrick Murphy
Assessment Officer Noosa Shire Council
[email protected]
File No: MCU 16/153 REC 16/0041
Proposed Development: Multiple Housing- Type 4, Visitor accommodation.
Dear Mr Murphy,
I am writing to support Veggie Village's submission against the proposed development at
Peregian Beach.
Forty years ago when I first bought land in Peregian Beach, the site under discussion was a
camping/ caravan park. It was barely visible from David Low Way because the site sloped away
from the road and was nestled amongst trees. It provided an affordable option of
accommodation, which is no longer available to a growing number of caravan owners and
campers.
This newly proposed conglomeration of buildings is going to block the view of the wallum
country to the west as well as the stunning sunsets, which can be seen against the outlines of the
mountains. Furthermore Little Rufous Creek will be blocked from continuing its journey into the
swamps farther south: not to mention how the development will affect the wildlife found in the
area.
One of the most appealing things about living at Peregian Beach is the Village atmosphere.
Allowing a development that will increase traffic flow in a space that struggles during holiday
times will only exacerbate the problem.
Lastly, I'd like to say that a construction, which doesn't 'blend' with its proposed space does have
an impact on the overall ambiance of a place. I'm reminded of a rather large,tiered,concrete
building which was built years ago up the side of Noosa Hill at the end of Hastings Street, which
when seen, as one paddles down the Noosa River spoils an otherwise beautiful view!!
Architecturally it does not embrace the natural environment.
I hope you will note my objections favourably.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely,
Jan Romanowski
Document Set ID: 20307647
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/04/2017
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalFull text of the other 3 pages
Page 2
Sent from my iPad Document Set ID: 20307647 Version: 1, Version Date: 26/04/2017
Page 3
Veggie Village Community Garden
Objection to the Scanlon Group Development Proposal
Patrick Murphy
Assessment Officer, Noosa Shire Council
[email protected]
Dear Mr Murphy,
File No MCU 16/153 REC 16/0041
Postal Address 215 David Low Way, PEREGIAN BEACH
Proposed Development Multiple Housing-Type 4, Visitor Accommodation
1) This Material Change of use Application contravenes the Noosa Town Plan & will destroy Peregian’s point
of difference & the attraction of our village for residents, holiday makers & shoppers. The Caravan Park
amenity, that was the real ‘essence’ of Peregian village, will be replaced by urban density with scarce
landscaping to soften the architectural bulk & concrete structures.
2) There’s No Compliance with Noosa Council requirements with most the accommodation proposed for
Permanent Housing. Priced from $725,000 to $850,000, this proposal hardly provides low cost visitor
accommodation for the needs of this community nor the wider Noosa Shire. Peregian Beach has already
been adversely impacted by nearby ‘new’ small lot housing developments that lack public amenity, open
space & village lifestyle. Low cost accommodation for campers & RVs would be an acceptable community
solution, celebrating the open space & providing a beach holiday experience for all.
3) Setbacks in general & to the Rufous laneway impinge on Noosa’s Master Plan for Rufous St Renewal which
is currently in progress, community amenity values & the extensive community consultation process
intended to activate the Bush to Beach pathway upgrade & encourage increased usage. The leafy ambience
planned for both Rufous laneway & Pocket Park to encourage parking & pedestrian access to the village
would be greatly compromised by the 2m proximity & 7m height of the proposed Reed & Wallum buildings,
on top of whatever level of fill is added to natural ground level.
4) The Development’s significant impact on the Creek & Wetland, both during construction & upon
completion is of tremendous concern, as is the planned density of housing on top of & beside this
ecologically sensitive reserve, adjacent Noosa National Park – Emu Swamp Section. The natural spring,
recognised in the 1960s & probably for thousands of years by our indigenous forebears, known locally as
Little Rufous Creek creates a watercourse that feeds into the wetland & contributes to its ecological value.
Some 25,000 cubic metres of imported fill will be required, giving rise to 150 trips per day for at least 3
months. This means one heavy vehicle axle load every 3-4 minutes along David Low Way, down Sandpiper
Court, through the IGA carpark & then back out via the Heron St roundabout. The impacts of such large
amounts of fill, will create fragmentation & attrition of the watercourse, its habitat values & biodiversity - an
environmental injustice for Qld Govt’s identified Mandatory Essential Habitat.
1
Document Set ID: 20307647
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/04/2017
Page 4
There is no reference in the DA to the planned disturbance to essential wetland habitat for the vulnerable
Wallum Froglet (Crinia tinnula), Wallum Rocketfrog (Litoria freycinet), Wallum Sedgefrog (Litoria
oblongburensis), nor the impact on wetland heathland & sedgeplain, inhabited by the vulnerable Ground
Parrot (Pezoporus wallicus) recorded less than 500ms from the site.
5) Significant & continuous Noise & Disruption to homes along David Low Way, adjoining streets, laneway,
PB Hotel, Hardware store, business & private premises near the roadways & roundabout is guaranteed. The
impact will be to the detriment of acoustic & visual qualities, lifestyle, holiday village ambience & business,
especially the al fresco dining/coffee shops that all enjoy fresh air & ocean sounds.
6) Substantially Increased Traffic & Congestion is assured during construction as standing traffic queues
currently form at all accesses to the roundabout, particularly at daily peak times, exacerbated further during
school & public holidays. The proposed development risks being a serious source of additional congestion &
given the layout/landform, nigh on impossible to mitigate in the future.
7) Foreground Vistas of the wetland & its vegetation across Noosa National Park-Emu Swamp Section to Mt
Cooroy will be diminished, in fact lost, to the bulky Hotel/Motel building’s projected heights. Council needs
to ensure height specifications are accurate & the current expansive views are maintained. Here’s an
opportunity to protect & showcase the intent of Noosa’s logo ‘Different by Nature’ by altering design or
lowering the amount of fill to protect the invaluable amenity of open space & ‘community vistas’.
8) Other concerns include density of buildings & infrastructure within the precinct, the provision of scarce
green space/vegetation/shade, preferred orientation to sunlight & natural breezes, the provision of public
access pathway between two story buildings, with little to recommend passive surveillance, particularly at
night. Light pollution is a further issue as every new light bulb impacts adversely on Peregian’s disappearing
night sky, particularly of concern with the density planned for this site.
9) So many missed opportunities to work with community in consultation with Noosa Council’s Master Plan
for Rufous St & the adjoining laneway to add to the amenity. The north-western corner’s existing vegetation
could have seen the creation of green space/parkland to embellish the precinct for visitors & local
community with potential to make genuine connections between Rufous St /laneway with this development.
Instead, it separates itself from the village feel, in fact opposes the local residential community & village
activities associated with the function & interaction of Veggie Village, Tennis Club, Kindergarten &
Community House, all nearby neighbours of the planned development.
This proposal conflicts with community values, endorsed by all who reside & those who choose this relaxed
pedestrian location, where thongs, even bare feet are the norm. It delivers instead, undesirable urban
density & city lifestyle that’s aesthetically at odds with Peregian’s much sought after open space linkages,
relaxed village character & community engagement.
Lin Martin on behalf of Veggie Village Community Gardens, Rufous St, [email protected]
2
Document Set ID: 20307647
Version: 1, Version Date: 26/04/2017
Used in these records
PM Submission Object - Jan Romanowski - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041Related documentApplication case desk ↗
PM Submission Object - Jan Romanowski - MCU16/0153 & REC16/0041Related documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 158 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.