Council archive · source document
MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Peter White
.,
4. Confirm lhat the 101lowln9 mandatory supWrtif19 inlormatlon auolllP'lnies this appll<:atlon
M.nd.tory supporting information Confirmation 01 Method of
lodgement lodgement
All applications
A site pia. drawn to o. approprlate scale (1:100.1:200 or 1:500 are ~nftnned
recommended scales) wIlich shows the fOllowing:
• til! localion .nd sne 8re. or the land to wlJich the application relates
(relevant IanrJ)
• tna nonh point
• the boundarias of tha relevanlland
• the location and use 01 any existing or proposed bull<llngs or _eture •
any ",.d fronlages of the relevant land, including the name 01 the road
• on the relevant land (,ola: wIlere extenslVe demolition or new buildlngs
ara proposed, two separate plans (an existing sile plan and prop<:>sOOSite
planl may be appropriate)
• any e"'sting or proposed easemants on tha relevart iand and their
funetlon
• the location and use 01 buildings on land adjoining Ille relevart land
• all vehicle aocess points and •• y existing Or proposed ea. partdng ••.•••
on the relevant land. Car parking spaces for petsons with disabilities and
any service vehido access and par1<lng 5hould be cl"",,y mar1<ed
• for any new building on 1M rolevanlland, !he Iocatioo 01 ref •••• storage
• tne I"",tlon or 3f'y proposed relalnlng walls 00 the relevant 'and and Ine~
helglll
• the tocatlon of any proposed landscaping OIl the rel!Vanlland ,
• the locallOll 01 any SlOrmwater detention on the f"levant land .
.
The Mandatory supporting information is lacking in its requirements in regards to the site
plan provided and there is lack of detail in particular to car parking areas, provision for those
with disabilities, service vehicle access etc.
The applicant confirmed that information provided demonstrated the on site parking
provisions, yet the hand drawn plan (not numbered) merely shows a line demonstrating
where access would occur and no direct provision or plans of car parking spaces.
When the application involves new operational work
Plan' Showing Ule nalure. location. !lUmber of new on-site Cllr par1<ing bays,
Pl1lI'Osed .rea of new landscaping, proPOSed lyp" 01 new vehicle cross-over
g; Cllnfirmed
NUl eppllcalje
(nea-re.ide<il1B1 use.), proposed maximum new vehl"",lar SlllYldng
a!1'.ngament (oon-resldentlal uses) of the proposed new opemtlonat ..cr!;.
The applicant has also confirmed that plans have been submitted to meet this mandatory
requirement but those provided do not achieve this requirement.
Due to the poor material submitted it is not possible to ascertain the use area, how operation
will occur, and how car parking will be provided.
Size and Scale of development
The submitted plans suggest a use area of 9m2 yet this makes no provisions for how the
boards will be loaded and unloaded of trailer. These boards are up to 305m in length and
require to be removed from the trailer to provide to customers. This will in effect make the
use area of the business expand out from the footprint pro'posed of 3.6m x 204m to approx.
705m x SAm (40m2). This is in estimation what will be required to service customers as they
chose the hire equipment from the trailer.
•
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
MCU14/0087 Notice of Submission - Peter WhiteRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 2.1 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.