Original source · versioned page text
2019-09-19 Ordinary Meeting Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
ORDINARY MEETING AGENDA 19 SEPTEMBER 2019
B. Advise the applicant that the structure must be modified to comply with the Development
Permit for Operational Works (OPW17/015) and approved plans within 6 months.
C. Write to the Department of Natural Resources, Mines and Energy and request that the
Department review the current commercial operations of Jetty 180 to ensure compliance
with the current lease conditions.
D. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.
For: Crs Jurisevic, Pardon, Stockwell, Wellington and Wilkie
Against: Crs Glasgow and Jackson
Carried.
3. MCU19/0081 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE FOR 16
ANCILLARY DWELLING UNITS AT 64 GATEWAY DRIVE NOOSAVILLE
Committee Recommendation
Moved: Cr Wellington
Seconded: Cr Jurisevic
That Council note the report by Manager Development Assessment to the Planning &
Environment Committee Meeting dated 10 September 2019 regarding Application No
MCU19/0081 for a Development Permit for Material Change of Use for 16 Ancillary Dwelling
Units situated at 64 Gateway Drive Noosaville and
A. Refuse the application for the following reasons:
1. The proposed development is not for Ancillary dwelling units as defined under
section 2.11.5 of the Planning Scheme because:
(i) multiple dwelling units are proposed on the premises;
(ii) the proposed dwelling units are not subordinate to the non-residential use.
2. The proposed development is for Multiple housing which under Table 11.9 of
Division 10 of the Noosaville Locality Plan is an inconsistent use in the Industry
Zone requiring impact assessment.
3. The proposed development is inconsistent with the Noosaville Locality Code in the
following respects:
(i) The proposed use will be incompatible with other uses and works on the
premises contrary 11.7.2(a)(i) of the Overall Outcomes Division 16;
(ii) The proposed use fails to protect the subject premises for industrial functions
to the exclusion of incompatible uses contrary to 11.7.2(vv)(ii) of the Overall
Outcomes Division 16;
4. The proposal is inconsistent with Overall Outcomes 14.51.2(a) and (b) of the
Detached House Code as land zoned industrial is not suited for residential use and
would be located in the vicinity of land uses which would adversely impact the
occupation and use of buildings and the site by residents and would result in the
residential development preventing or inhibiting the conduct of existing land uses.
5. A number of the proposed dwelling units contain upper level storage levels directly
accessed by internal stairs which would not meet fire separation requirements of
the Building Code of Australia.
6. There is no planning need for the proposed development.
7. The proposed development is inconsistent with the existing development approval
in effect for the development of the site for industrial uses and represents a
piecemeal development.
Page 10 of 16
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.