Original source · versioned page text
2018-04-10 Services & Organisation Committee Agenda
The original of this document is very large (22.2 MB). Opening the original or downloading it may take a few minutes. Please be patient and don't click again. The page text is quick to read. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 10 APRIL 2018
Option 3: Council supports Pomona Arts Inc by meeting PAI’s mortgage repayments for
the next three years.
Option 3 sees the Majestic remain in community ownership but with Council providing emergency
financial support to Pomona Arts Inc giving the organisation the opportunity to reduce its
overdraft and trade out of its financial difficulties.
Depending on how this option was structured, it may also require prior Queensland Treasury
approval for making specific mortgage payments of a non-Council party.
Pros Cons
The organisation should be able to reduce its Building condition unknown
overdraft and continue to meet its financial
commitments
PAI management committee can increase their No Conservation Management Plan developed
focus on managing and activating the building
Allows time for PAI to implement some identified Council sets a precedent by assisting a
measures to improve its financial sustainability community group to purchase an asset
(something that it was not prepared to do with a
recent request from Cooroora Historical Society
who were seeking Council assistance to purchase
the Masonic Temple)
Option 4: Council supports Pomona Arts Inc with a one off payment and works with PAI
to develop and implement a Conservation Management Plan
This option sees Council provide a one off payment to the PAI upon certain conditions to assist
them reduce their overdraft and undertake a condition assessment of the Majestic Theatre with a
view to developing a Conservation Management Plan and a schedule of programmed
maintenance for the building in conjunction with PAI.
Pros Cons
Council’s one off injection of funds will allow the Funding pressures may be exacerbated should
organisation to reduce its overdraft and continue to any reactive building works be required following
meet its mortgage repayments the condition assessment
The actual condition of the building is known and a No certainty of increased Council support to PAI
Conservation Management Plan developed within after 12 months
12 months allowing Council to consider the long
term future of the building
PAI management committee can increase their
focus on managing and activating the building
Allows time for PAI to implement some identified
measures (i.e. business plan including income
diversification) to improve its financial sustainability
Council commits to reviewing its support to the PAI
in 12 months time with a better understanding of the
PAI’s long term financial sustainability
Page 17 of 91
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalVery large file: the download may take a few minutes. If you are on mobile data, it is best to wait until you are on Wi-Fi.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.