Minor Change Request Letter · 132000.200186.1

In line with this, we request that Condition 11 which currently reads, “Development undertaken in accordance
with this approval must generally comply with the approved plans of development. The approved plans are
numbered 25.401.1 to 25.401.1 prepared by Andrew McKellar Design and dated April 2000 and as may be
amended by these conditions,” be updated to read, “Development undertaken in accordance with this approval
must generally comply with the approved plans of development. The approved plans are titled/numbered as
per the following, and as may be amended by these conditions:

 Plan Number/Title                                          Dated                  Prepared By
 Site Plan WD 1.2                                           May 2022               Sparks Architects
 Proposed Residence 25.401.1 (Amended in Red)               April 2000             Andrew McKellar
 Lower Ground Floor Set Out Plan WD 1.6                     May 2022               Sparks Architects
 Proposed Residence 25.401.2                                April 2000             Andrew McKellar
 Proposed Residence 25.401.3 (Amended in Red)               April 2000             Andrew McKellar
 South Elevation WD 2.1                                     May 2022               Sparks Architects
 East Elevation WD 2.2                                      May 2022               Sparks Architects


In addition to this, we also request that Condition 4 which reads, “The driveway shall be a maximum of 4.0
metres wide where it crosses the property boundary and the balance of the driveway within the lot shall be the
minimum area required to provide access to the proposed garage. The remainder of the driveway within the
footpath shall also have a maximum width of 4.0 metres,” be removed on the basis that the existing driveway
– which was established in excess of 18 years ago – has a width (at the property boundary and within the
footpath) greater than four metres. While this four metre restriction was probably relevant/reasonable at the
time of approval, the prevalence of nearby driveway widths (at the property boundary and within the
footpath) greater than four metres (refer to Figures 1) seems to indicate that this is no longer the case.




Figure 1: >4m Wide Driveways near the Site (Green Marker)                              Source: NearMap 2021
                               Bartley Burns Town Planning Pty Ltd  ABN 36 413 954 407
                          1300 051 189  [email protected]  www.bartleyburns.com.au