MCU15/0122 - PM Submission Object - Jo Dillon

Subject: RE: Planning Development MCU15/0122
From: [email protected]
Date: 2016-07-11T00:40:13+00:00
To: Mailbox Council Mail

To Whom It May Concern

I, Joanne Barbara Dillon of 9 Val Crescent, Noosaville and my husband Peter William Mitchell strongly object to the proposed Commercial Business Type2 Medical & Retail Business Type 2 at 52-58 Goodchap Street & 3-7 Val Crescent, Noosaville.

Our reasons are as follows:
1.         We bought 9 Val Crescent, Noosaville because it was zoned Residential and being a cul-de-sac a quiet neighbourhood to bring up our 2 girls.
2.         We have just spent over $50,000 in materials and approximately $50,000 in labour on an extension to the back of our home as a covered deck to take advantage of the winter sun.  Unfortunately this development will block the sun.
3.         Reviewing the plans of the development we have concerns to the air flow between the two properties.  In Summer the deck was designed with the airflow to cool down the area. We would be concerned about the damp and mould with our deck area and our home.
4.         We are concerned also with the traffic noise with cars coming directly off Goodchap Street and parking under this building.
5.         Currently we have a great relationship with our neighbours.  Security wise if we are not home there is always a neighbour home around us.  Everyone is aware of any unusual activity.  This building will be closed Saturday pm to Monday am        we would want to know what security systems will be in place and whether there will be any impact to us.
6.         Val Crescent is used often as parking for patients going to the hospital.  There is a concern that although they have parking in this development there could possibility still be more overflow which will end up on Val Crescent.

We have approached the Developer directly to find out what they are proposing along the fence line and we also raised our concerns regarding the height of the two storey section of the development.  Unfortunately, to our disappointment they did not come back to us with answers to these questions.

We look forward to hearing from you in due course.

Yours sincerely

Jo Dillon