Original source · versioned page text
2017-02-07 P&E Agenda Attachment 1 to Item 8 Community Feedback on New Noosa Plan
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawn Attachment 1 to Item 8
Planning and Environment Committee Meeting
7 February 2017
ATTACHMENT 1- SUBMISSIONS TABLE
Submitter Comments Staff Response
THEME: SETTLEMENT
Sub-Theme: Urban Footprint
1, 14 Encourage development in current urban areas reducing urban sprawl. Would The submission in part supports a number of proposals within the Discussion
rather see 4 storey apartment blocks in commercial/retail/industrial zones and Paper but mixed use outcomes have limited application across residential
community/medical developments in residential zones than disparate/separate areas.
precincts that force us to drive everywhere. Let's mix it up to ensure a vibrant
liveable and successful green urban environment and a sustainable Noosa.
132 Agree with the concept of not increasing the urban footprint yet have concerns at The concern is noted though there are no significant proposals current for
the proposition of increasing the capacity of hinterland for more intensive tourism tourism developments across the hinterland. The new scheme will continue
and commercial accommodation. to facilitate small-scale and nature based visitor experiences and home-based
businesses where impacts on surrounding land uses are negligible.
132 More effort should be made to focus on redevelopment and renewal rather than The submission supports a number of proposals within the Discussion Paper.
allowing the clearing of undeveloped sites that allow biodiversity off-sets. Allowing There is only limited land area available for development that might involve
developer incentives for redevelopment of sites should be investigated to make land clearing.
this a more viable option.
188 Increase housing in rural towns. The existing towns have capacity for additional housing. The new scheme
should improve housing choice within rural towns particularly Cooroy and
Pomona where transport and urban services are readily available.
Sub-Theme: Subdivision/Infrastructure
22 Need infrastructure to kick off housing boom. The provision of local infrastructure to support development is accepted as
the responsibility of a developer.
75 Layout of towns already done - don't like the narrow streets of development There are issues associated with narrow streets regarding access and parking.
estates. Refer to drafting
80, 121 The “population cap” of 61,500 (with current residents of ca 53,000) should not be The draft South East Queensland regional plan has a horizon of 2041. Using
increased further. The cap must be proactively managed and maintained via Queensland Treasury projections, Noosa’s population will grow to
zoning and other measures in respect of projected population growth in SE approximately 63,000 by that date. The New Noosa Plan is likely to have to
Queensland. There should be no more land-clearing for housing, or indeed other, provide for a population around that figure, which suggests no significant
industrial, commercial or agricultural developments. changes would be required.
Page 1
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.