Original source · versioned page text
2017-02-07 P&E Agenda Attachment 1 to Item 8 Community Feedback on New Noosa Plan
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnSubmitter Comments Staff Response
LOCALITY: SHIRE WIDE
5, 9, 10, 19, 56, 75, Noosa is a great place to live, please don’t change anything. It’s unique due to its These submissions and many attendees at the consultation stands comment
118, 121 natural landscapes and amenity. Each village has a unique identity and sense of that overall Noosa is a great place to live and that it has an extraordinary
place. landscape of great beauty.
15 Better signage and wayfinding for visitors. Refer to Transport Strategy
27 Setbacks for sheds - has seen long shed (15m) only 1.5m from boundary Refer to drafting
27 Concerned with tone of Discussion Paper around commercial uses on foreshore. The Discussion Paper acknowledges tourism remaining as a key part of
Inferring foreshore uses are inferior to others. Noosa’s future economy. It is agreed that water-based businesses are an
important segment of the opportunities on offer to visitors.
27 Noosa river boating users and ferries are key driver for local economy. Should
The Discussion Paper separately noted that there have been instances of
come through in the planning scheme.
foreshore businesses expanding into public spaces and that the matter is
126 The Discussion paper mentions that Tewantin is the getaway to the river. However under review. It also proposes that commercial land uses on Noosaville
this should be amended to be Noosaville as that is where the majority of the foreshore be restricted to a marine function. These statements were not
commercial and private boating activities start and conclude. The paper also intended to infer that the role of the foreshore businesses is less important to
mentions to the need to support the river related businesses at the Tewantin other businesses.
Marina and would like this to be extended to support the established and Refer to the Noosaville Foreshore Master Plan.
significant commercial businesses already operating in Noosaville and Noosa
Heads. In addition the New Noosa Plan should recognise that the success of the
tourist experiences on the River is due to the services and facilities offered from
commercial jetties and that Gympie Terrace be recognised as its own economic
zone of significance. They support the outcomes for Noosaville in the discussion
paper and commend the preparation of a new foreshore master plan, however
wold like more positive wording around use of commercial jetties rather than
using the terminology about commercial jetties needing to be restricted. Would
like Council to consult with existing commercial land use holders before approving
other commercial activities in adjoining areas and establish a process to ensure
commercial lessees are consulted if applications are sought to use adjoining public
land for commercial uses. We oppose the prevalence of commercial operators
working out of trucks in public areas, commercial companies operating from public
boat ramps and tour companies collecting passengers from public carparks instead
of a commercial site which holds proper insurances. Any future limits on signage
need to recognise the need for those operating on the foreshore to have signage
on all 4 sides of buildings and exempt directional signage etc. to be exempted
from the limit.
Page 21
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.