Original source · versioned page text
2017-02-07 P&E Agenda Attachment 1 to Item 8 Community Feedback on New Noosa Plan
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnSubmitter Comments Staff Response
Developers are already seeking to exploit rural settlement zones for health and
wellbeing, hospice or other uses with little connection to land and the desired
outcomes for land designated as Regional Landscape and Rural Production. We
object to any proposed rezoning of land from rural to rural residential and any
proposal with up to 30 guest plus staff is an urban development.
139 Continued recognition of the ecosystem services that the rural areas of Noosa
contribute, recognition and support for best practice land management and allow
for appropriate rural enterprise with reasonable infrastructure demands and
protect good agricultural land from fragmentation.
50 Why stop intensive farming - like to see a boutique feedlot boning room
enterprise. Boning rooms are limited in number by Department of Primary
Industries. These already exist in locality but more should be allowed.
50 Free range chicken farming is not intensive enough and won't feed a family.
171 Intensive farming should have no place in Noosa. Noosa should be known for its Council proposes to review animal farming provisions in the New Noosa Plan.
great environment and encouragement of environmentally friendly farming
practices, rather than an area where intensive farming of any type blots the land,
air and waterways with its dust, waste and other by-products.
120 Need to maintain rural road infrastructure linkages in any new policy setting. Noted
120, 174 Consider the use of underutilised rural land for eco-living with low impact If aging rural land owners want to remain on their property but no longer in
affordable housing. Witchcliffe in WA example. the main house they have the ability to build a small secondary dwelling,
however these cannot be subdivided. Any other form of multiple permanent
residences is not permissible in rural areas. (See South East Qld Regional Plan)
120, 121 Use mapping overlays to protect biodiversity corridors and values, waterways and Overlay mapping and codes are the usual approach to acknowledging these
riparian zones over public and private land. Using mapping to protect good quality values in the development assessment process.
agricultural land from development and further fragmentation. Protect water
catchments and key resource areas that can be sustainably extracted for local
construction industries.
121 Country Noosa is concerned about the interpretation of applying a rural residential Council proposes a review of the agricultural development provisions to
zone on acreage lots where rural living is the preferred dominant use - allow only determine whether there can be better approaches to protecting agricultural
discrete rural enterprise with no external impacts. This will increase buffer zones interests.
and separation distances impacting greatly on already existing rural enterprise and
significantly reduce the prospect of making many rural properties financially
Page 25
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.