Original source · versioned page text
2017-02-07 P&E Agenda Attachment 1 to Item 8 Community Feedback on New Noosa Plan
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
This document appears to be plans or drawings. Its page text below holds only the words printed on the drawings, without the drawings themselves, so it may be jumbled or hard to follow. To see the plans as drawn, choose Original above or download the file (both need you to log in).
Log in to see the plans as drawnSubmitter Comments Staff Response
145 At present greenfield developers are able to subdivide the land into large lots and
pass these on to builders with covenants which ensure large houses = large profits.
Developers should be required to provide a well-designed mix with, say 25%
affordable.
149 The secondary unit could be larger, or enlargeable. (In many mature countries all
these needs are met in larger family ‘compounds’ which modify from time to time
as needs change – without having to relocate.) Often the income from secondary
accommodation is not taxed. This should apply to all, but management
responsibility should rest with the owner.
152 Council should look at adopting similar policies as the 'new generation boarding
houses' in Sydney and rooming house policy in Brisbane. This would allow clean
modern affordable options for single people in a safe environment. They are
micro apartments and totally consistent with the global tiny house trend.
157 Feel that with amended secondary dwelling planning, the primary dwelling would
provide much needed housing for families and the secondary dwelling could be
used by singles or couples who don't need so much room but still wish to retain
some privacy. Downsizers then stay in the community they love, families have a
home in the community they love and the rural economy benefits and provides
jobs for our families.
15, 83 Need to allow more duplexes to increase housing density. Up zoning in
appropriate locales from medium to high density close to public transport while
maintaining low max height levels and relaxing car parking provisions for sites in
central zones.
Sub-Theme: Visitor Accommodation
15 Ivory Palms needs to be extended to allow occupation for owners extended to 5 The Ivory Palms development in Hilton Terrace has a condition on its
months. development approval that limits the period of time persons can be resident.
This condition is intended to ensure the complex is used for visitor
accommodation. To vary that condition, an appropriate application must be
made to Council.
32 Retain Halse Lodge and not allow it to be developed into a private residence or Halse Lodge is included on the Queensland Government State Heritage
luxury hotel. Has served the world wide backpacking community as a low cost register such that any significant change to the premises requires government
accommodation and dining option for over 20 years. Should remain as Community approval in addition to any Council approval under the Noosa Plan. However a
review of provisions can be undertaken to ensure the continued use of the
Page 6
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalSearchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.