Council archive · source document
Minor Change Report 132001 210327 1 · 132001.210327.1
• storeys 8m 8m <8 metres
• metres
Boundary setbacks
• Frontage (West) 6.0m min 1.5m* 1.5m (POD)
• Side (North) 1.5/2/2.5m min 1.5m* (3.4m - 3.75m) 2.0m X
• Side (South) 1.5/2/2.5m min 1.5m* 2.5m
• Rear (East) 6.0m min 1.5m* 0m X (POD)
Length of wall 15m max NA <15m
Carparking 2 covered min 2 spaces min 2 covered spaces
* Setbacks in POD state min 1.5m or half the building height (whichever is greater).
Short-Stay Letting & Home Hosted Accommodation (Short-Term Accommodation)
AO3.2 Short-term accommodation:
a. does not constitute a party house;
b. makes available no more than one self contained dwelling at any one time;
c. noise does not unreasonably impact on the residential amenity enjoyed by the
adjoining or surrounding properties; and
d. makes available no more than five bedrooms.
Assessment
The subject site currently operates with interchangeable use rights for a dwelling house and short
stay letting (‘SSL’). The current SSL permits the use of 6 bedrooms total for a maximum of 12
persons. While the primary dwelling and the detached guest bedrooms total no more than 6
bedrooms the detached home office presents as a ‘self-contained’ building and has the potential
to not comply with AO3.2. as such will be conditioned and annotated appropriately to ensure he
home office does not form part of the permissible SSL usage. No assessment is required against
PO3 as the proposal can be conditioned to comply.
Scenic Amenity
AO20.1 To protect scenic amenity and other landscape qualities:
a. buildings and structures are not constructed on land with a slope greater than 33%;
and
b. buildings and structures are only constructed on steep slopes if:
i. there are no other suitable building sites on the property; and
ii. construction utilises suspended floors or pole footings rather than slab on ground
construction.
Assessment
The proposed dwelling house alterations/additions occur on parts of the site which are mapped
with contour relief (shown on the detailed survey plan provided by the applicant) that indicates a
slope greater than 33%. Further to this, the building works do not opt for elevated design and
instead rely on slab on ground construction. As such, assessment is required against the
performance outcome.
Page 10 of 17
Document Set ID: 23279545
Version: 5, Version Date: 09/12/2024
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Minor Change Report 132001 210327 1.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 5.1 MB (large file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.
Original file
Log in to download the original file
The download may take up to a minute.