Skip to the record
The first. The best. The only NoosaWatch™.

Original source · versioned page text

ResponsetoApplicantReport

Attached to the e-mail MCU12/0184 Concerns about development approval Rod Ritchie.

of 8

Page text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Typical export rates for nutrient export are listed below. Market gardens are the
highest exporter at 26 kg N/ha/y. The estimates of nutrient loss from the
disposal area are significantly higher than those reported for market gardens and
much higher than those reported for other land uses.

I have attached a couple of references.

The Western Australian paper is of less importance. It is a modelling exercise not
a measurement process. The rate of export for the Leschernault catchment was
about 1.8 kg N/ha/y and the stream water quality was not acceptable. I am
guessing there are other factors apart from the loading rate contributing to water
quality problems in the Leschernault catchment.

Conclusion
There will be a significant reduction is storm water quality and or deep drainage
nutrient concentrations associated with the proposed nutrient loading rates
within the disposal area.
Log in to download the original file

ResponsetoApplicantReport.pdf · 70 KB (small file)

Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.