Skip to the record
The gold standard in government transparency.

Council archive · source document

MCU15/0095 & REC15/0022 PM Submission Object - Jenelle Wilson

of 27

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Very large file (10.2 MB): the original may take a few minutes to open or download. The page text below is quick to read.

             neighbourhood'      consisting of Community Services, Housing and Open-space Recreations Zones,
             and is NOT appropriate       given the existing and likely future traffic movements              in the area.'


     4.      There are no matters of public interest to bear in relation to the proposed Development                        that
             are grounds to accept the non-complying             Application   under s326 of the Sustainable Planning
             Act (2009) (SPA), and indeed the Development             is detrimental     to the public interest.


     S.      The Application     DOES NOT COMPLY, or fails to provide creditable supporting                   evidence to
             substantiate    claims of compliance, with over thirty (30) aspects of relevant planning instruments.


1. INC9~SISIENT_USE;
A shop is identified        as an inconsistent     use within the Industry Zone, being a Retail Business Type 2, and
the Application       must be rejected        on those grounds.        Under the Sustainable            Planning Act 2009 The
assessment manager's decision must not conflict with a relevant instrument,                       unless there are there are
sufficient    favourable     public interest grounds to justify the decision, despite the conflict.


Section 326(1)(b) of the SPA sets out sufficient            grounds for departing          from a relevant instrument.             The
SPA provides that an assessment manager may decide a development                          application    in a way that conflicts
with a relevant instrument            only in certain circumstances,     the relevant of which here is where there are
sufficient     grounds to justify the decision, despite the conflict. This means that an assessment manager
may approve          an application,       even though     the    proposed      development       conflicts     with    a relevant
instrument,      only if there are sufficient grounds for approving the development                despite the conflict.


Conflict     means to be "at variance            or disagree with"     and must be plainly identified.            In the current
circumstances        the proposed        Development     is in direct conflict     with the planning          scheme, being an
inconsistent      use for the Industry zone. The planning scheme does not provide for a co-located service
station/retail     convenience shop in the Industry zone.


The term 'grounds',          in the context, is defined in the SPA to mean matters of public interest. Apart from
defining the term grounds, the SPA does not provide any guidance about what grounds are sufficient for
justifying    a decision that may conflict with a relevant instrument.                 The matters 'public interest',         derive
from the subject matter           being considered     which includes the community            need, wellbeing,         protection,
health and safety of the community             or affected classes of persons. In determining             whether      a conflicting
Development         should     be Approved       he Assessment      Manager      may also consider         negative     impact     on
matters of public interest.


The Development         does not meet a substantiated         community        need

A development        may be said to be needed if, on balance, it improves community                       wellbeing.     Wellbeing
may be improved         by access to new services or facilities or a range of other ways. However, any new
uses must be compatible           with surrounding      uses in terms of amenity, the environment                and economics.
As is demonstrated          through    this document    the proposed Development             does not improve          community



, Noosa Plan, Part 14 - Assessment Criteria for Development for a Stated Purpose or of a Stated Type - For Service
   Stations - Siting
, ibid



                                                                                                                                       2

Used in these records

About this file

File size
10.2 MB (very large file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

MCU15_0095 & REC15_0022 PM Submission Object - Jenelle Wilson.pdf · 10.2 MB (very large file)

The download may take a few minutes. On mobile data, it is best to wait for Wi-Fi.

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.