Original source · versioned page text
2017-06-12 General Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
AGENDA
General Committee
Meeting
Monday, 12 June 2017
commencing at 10am
Council Chambers, 9 Pelican Street, Tewantin
Committee: Crs Frank Wilkie (Chair), Jess Glasgow, Ingrid Jackson,
Joe Jurisevic, Frank Pardon, Brian Stockwell, Tony Wellington
“Noosa Shire – different by nature”
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.
Full text of the other 31 sections
Section 2
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM PAGE
ATTENDANCE & APOLOGIES -
PRESENTATIONS -
ITEMS REFERRED FROM PLANNING & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE 2
1. MCU16/0137 DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE OF
PREMISES ENTERTAINMENT & DINING BUSINESS TYPE 2 RECREATION,
AMUSEMENT & FITNESS (FITNESS CENTRE) AT NOOSA HOME 5/8 SELKIRK DR
NOOSAVILLE
(Planning & Environment Committee Agenda, 6 June 2017, Item 1, Page 3)
Reason for referral - To allow staff time to review proposed changes to Condition 7.
2. ALIGNMENT AMENDMENTS TO THE NOOSA PLAN 2006 - PLANNING ACT 2016
(Planning & Environment Committee Agenda, 6 June 2017, Item 6, Page 71)
Reason for referral – Amendments are required and are to be presented in a Further
Report for consideration at the General Committee meeting.
Refer Further Report at Item 6 below.
ITEMS REFERRED FROM SERVICES & ORGANISATION COMMITTEE 2
3 NOOSA TRANSPORT STRATEGY 2017-2027 - ADOPTION
(Services and Organisation Committee Agenda, 6 June 2017, Item 1, Page 3)
Reason for referral – Significance of the issue.
4 FUTURE OF HANG GLIDING AND PARAGLIDING ACTIVITY – TINGIRA CRESCENT,
SUNRISE BEACH
(Services and Organisation Committee Agenda, 6 June 2017, Item 4, Page 29)
Reason for referral – Significance of the issue
REPORTS DIRECT TO GENERAL COMMITTEE 3
5 1617T097 CLEANING OF COUNCIL BUILDINGS & FACILITIES 3
6 FURTHER REPORT - ALIGNMENT AMENDMENTS TO THE NOOSA PLAN 2006 -
PLANNING ACT 2016 9
7 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE REPORT - MAY 2017 25
CLOSED SESSION -
Page 2 of 32
Section 3
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
REPORTS DIRECT TO GENERAL COMMITTEE
5 1617T097 CLEANING OF COUNCIL BUILDINGS & FACILITIES
DOCUMENT INFORM AT ION
Author Building & Plumbing Services Manager, Allan Hazell
Planning & Infrastructure Department
Index ECM/Subject/Contracting/Council Properties
ECM/Subject/Contracts/Tenders
ECM/Project/1617T097 – Cleaning of Council Buildings & Facilities
Attachments 1. Tender Evaluation Summary Sheets
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report provides a recommendation for the appointment of the preferred contractors for the
cleaning of council buildings & facilities.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Building & Plumbing Services Manager to the General
Committee Meeting dated 12 June 2016 and:
A. Award tender 1617T097 for Cleaning of Council Buildings & Facilities to the following
contractors:
Price per year (GST
Portion Contractor
Exclusive)
1 Ecovist Pty Ltd $105,300 plus consumables
Nicholson & Kamerling t/as Laguna Lawns &
2 $18,018 plus consumables
Gardens
3 Ecovist Pty Ltd $2,600 plus consumables
B. Award tender 1617T097 for Cleaning of Council Buildings & Facilities for an initial period of
twelve (12) months, with options to extend the contract for three (3) periods of up to twelve
(12) months each. Options to extend will be at Council’s sole discretion and subject to
Council’s review of Contractor performance under the Contract and proposed prices.
REPORT
The contract is for the cleaning of Council buildings & facilities. The contract is split into three (3)
separable portions as follows:
Portion Building Location / Facility
Tewantin Administrative Building
1 Doonella House
Noosa Regional Art Gallery
Noosaville Depot
2
Pomona Depot
Eumundi Waste Transfer Depot Office
3 Cooroy Waste Transfer Depot Office
Pomona Waste Transfer Depot Office
Page 3 of 32
Section 4
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
The commencement date is 1 July 2017 with an initial term of one (1) year. The contract has
options to extend for three (3) terms of up to twelve (12) months each at Council’s sole
discretion.
1. Tender Process
Due to the nature of the services required, and the value of the works being greater than
$200,000 should the duration include the extension options, Council called a public tender for the
works through the LG Tender Box system in accordance with the Local Government Act 2009.
An open invitation to tender was released via LG Tender Box on 24 February 2017 with
advertising in the Sunshine Coast Daily on 25 February 2017 and in the Noosa News on 28
February 2017. The tender closed on 20 March 2017. A total of 16 firms submitted conforming
tenders.
2. Tender Assessment
The tender evaluation panel undertook an assessment of the conforming tender submissions
from the following Tenderers:
Tenderers Portion 1 Portion 2 Portion 3
Storm International Pty Ltd
McCullough Cleaning Services
Total Building Maintenance
Achieve Corporate Services Pty Ltd
Biniris (Aust.) Pty Ltd
Ecovist Pty Ltd
Quality Commercial Cleaning Pty Ltd (ESA Group)
Total Focus Concepts Pty Ltd
Kerle Projects
CMBM Facility Services Pty Ltd
DW Commercial Cleaning Services Pty Ltd
4 Perfect Cleaning Services (Procure Spot)
Swampy Cleaning
Nicholson & Kamerling t/as Laguna Lawns & Gardens
Ian Tattersall
House With No Steps (HWNS)
The tenders were evaluated using the following criteria:
Capability and resourcing;
Contract experience and capacity;
Methodology;
Quality;
Health and safety;
Environment and sustainability;
Contribution to local economy; and
Price.
The tender evaluation team considers the tenders from Ecovist Pty Ltd and Nicholson &
Kamerling t/as Laguna Lawns & Gardens to be the most advantageous to Council and presents
the best value for money.
Page 4 of 32
Section 5
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Ecovist Pty Ltd and Nicholson & Kamerling t/as Laguna Lawns & Gardens tender submission is
favourable as they have:
significant previous experience;
an excellent track record with similar projects; and
are more than capable and have the necessary resources to deliver the services required.
The evaluation also assessed the tenderers’ ability to deliver quality services required based on
the number of hours nominated to perform the services.
Ecovist Pty Ltd currently provides cleaning services under contract for library facilities, and
Nicholson & Kamerling t/as Laguna Lawns & Gardens currently provide cleaning services at the
Council depots under contract, with both firms providing excellent cleaning services under
contract to Council.
Ecovist Pty Ltd and Nicholson & Kamerling t/as Laguna Lawns & Gardens are locally owned and
operated businesses.
Previous Council Consideration
Nil.
Finance & Risk
The 2017/18 budget includes an appropriate provision for cleaning services identified under this
contract arrangement.
Ecovist Pty Ltd and Nicholson & Kamerling t/as Laguna Lawns & Gardens would be responsible
for Workplace Health and Safety. It is a requirement that prior to commencing, workplace health
and safety plans be submitted to Council for approval. Regular audits on compliance with these
approved plans will be undertaken by Council throughout the delivery of the cleaning services.
The risk of meeting cleaning objectives is to be managed by Council under the contract.
Consultation
External Consultation - Community & Stakeholder
Not Applicable.
Internal Consultation
Finance, Procurement, Waste & Environmental Health, Civil Operations, Property and Facilities
Teams.
Departments/Sections Consulted:
Chief Executive Officer Community Services X Corporate Services
Executive Officer to the Mayor & CEO Community Facilities x Financial Services
Executive Support Community Development ICT
Libraries & Galleries x Procurement & Fleet
Local Laws x Property & Facilities
x Waste & Environmental Health Revenue Services
Executive Office X Planning & Infrastructure
Community Engagement X Building & Plumbing Services
Customer Service x Civil Operations
Economic Development Disaster Management
Governance Infrastructure Planning & Design
Human Resources Planning & Environment
Sustainability Strategic Land Use Planning
Page 5 of 32
Section 6
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Page 6 of 32
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Attachment 1
Final Evaluation
Weighted Attribute Evaluation Spreadsheet
vceee Loe) +
No. |NAME OF TENDERER (excl of GS
1 [Storm intematonalPtyLid.—~~S~SCS<C ;«SC];3SS”*~*~*” a "0 » ” “ “0 6 n ” ” ‘wo
> faecoro clens Sens Unocceptae Very Poor Pree Dood very ood Encoqtenet
3 [Total Building Maintenance The ratings:
4 |Achieve Corporate ServcesPlyltd~~—~—SCS«S + 0 (zero) = Unacceptable ~ a fail for that criteria and extreme risk
5 [Biniris(Aust.) PtyLtd + 20 (twenty) = Very Poor - the content of the submission for that criteria is of a low standard and high risk
6 |Ecovist + 40 (forty) = Poor - the content of the submission for that criteria is unimpressive and poses a moderate risk
7 [Quality Commercial Cleaning Pty Ltd(ESA Group) + 60 (sixty) = Good - the content of the submission for that criteria is meritable and will need to be monitored if awarded
8 + 80 (eighty) = Very Good - the content of the submission for that criteria is of a high standard and advantageous
9 |Kerle Projects + 100 (one-hundred) = Exceptional ~ the content of the submission for that criteria is flawless / outstanding and most advantageous
10
1 Once all the data is entered the resultant scores based on the price and non price elements are automatically calculated for you
12 |4 Perfect Cleaning Services (Procure Spot)
13 [Swampy CleanngSSCSC~S
NON-CONFORMING TENDERS Number of Tenders Evaluated = [13 ]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
— Pena aac | mane fgets] a |e | mene | mr, |g
Quality
(ESA Group)
SN ed rg ed eg ed ed dg ee eed
arabity@ Resourcing | | sco | ze | oo | 20 | moo | a5 | seo | ze | roo | as | v0 | «5 | so | ze | ooo | 20 | so | 20 | soo | ze | soo | 20 | seo | 20 | coo | 20 |
ontactexperieneescapscty | 2% | seo | ss6 | sro | 114 | oso | 136 | seo | 116 | seo | 112 | 900 | wo | seo | 116 | oo | 160 | 70 | 154 | soo | 160 | roo | 140 | seo | 108 | seo | 16 |
paetnocotoay om] 7 | so | sor | sa | ser | a0 | azo | 43 | ceo | ao | 63 | os | aro | 47 | ors | s7 | res | 79 | oo4 | co | one | eo | oe | oe | o50 | 95 |
mn °° | 92 | azo | 71 | 30 | 110 | eso | os | seo | 7 | oro | v2 | sso | eo | mo | u1 | m0 | 107 | oso | s20 | oxo | v6 | aro | zs | aro | 71 |
eat Satay mo | so | too | 20 | moo | a5 | ooo | 30 | 0} so | oo | 20 | ooo | 20 | soo | 25 | soo | 25 | tooo] so | soo | 25 | ao | 20 | wo | 20 |
Environment @Sustainbity | % | sz0 | 26 | soo | 15 | mo | a7 | coo | 0 | oo | 4s | reo | se | wo | 10 | mo | a7 | zo | s6 | wo | 43 | ovo | 29 | aro | 24 | aro | 2a |
Gentatontekscalteoromy | iow | az | 2s | coo [co | sas | sa { coo | co | sas | 24 | tooo] oo | oo | oo | v0 | 20 | soo | as | zoo | 20 | vo | ze | coo | oo | ovo | 2s |
Nomalleed Teotnical Score (Tn)
PART Brice element pty Lid | Cleaning Services | Maintenance | ServcesPryiid'| ud |__F®°¥*t_ | commerciat_| concepts pry id | KevleProiects_ | cervees py Lid | Cleaning Services| Services Procure | SWamY Channa
Total Fees (Pc) 50% 50 85,626 557 880 90,558 93,20 05,300 08,50 34,510 49,760 68,425 0,10 90,75 04,
Price Score 133.0 129.1 127.1 117.6 94.7 82.8 68.2 66.9 50.7 40.0
Normalised Price Score (Pn) 92.7 90.0 88.5 81.9 66.0 57.7 475 46.6 35.3 278
Weighted Price Score (Pw)
elements
OTHER DETAILS
Assesment panel member 1 Facility Officer (IP)
Assesment panel member 2 Building & Plumbing Services Manager (AH) The Contract Administrator confirms the above weightings
Assesment panel member 3 Health & Safety Officer (MS) Contract Administrator's signature:
Assesment panel member 4 Procurement Advisor (AH)
Page 6 of 32Section 7
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Page 7 of 32
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Final Evaluation
Weighted Attribute Evaluation Spreadsheet
[ContractNo; tt TOOT
ee ee
ee
No, |VAME OF TENDERER excl of OS t—>—_+—_}+—_+—_+-—_ +—_ +--+
1 Lani © | a 8 & " ian " ~3
3 Biniris (Aust) PtyLtd The ratings
4 [McCullough CleaningServices +0 (zero) = Unacceptable ~ a fail for that criteria and extreme risk
5 |LagunaLawns&Gardens Cid + 20 (twenty) = Very Poor - the content of the submission for that criteria is of a low standard and high risk
6 [DW Commercial Cleaning Services PtyLtd + 40 (forty) = Poor — the content of the submission for that criteria is unimpressive and poses a moderate risk
7 |CMBM Facility ServcesPtyLtd + 60 (sixty) = Good - the content of the submission for that criteria is meritable and will need to be monitored if awarded
8 |lanTattersal * 80 (eighty) = Very Good — the content of the submission for that criteria is of a high standard and advantageous
9 lEcovist + 100 (one-hundred) = Exceptional — the content of the submission for that criteria is flawiess / outstanding and most advantageous
i" Swampy Changs Once all the data is entered the resultant scores based on the price and non price elements are automatically calculated for you
[TotalFocusConcepts
12 [Total Building Maintenance
13
NON-CONFORMING TENDERS Number of Tenders Evaluated = [13 ]
Poo notevaluatoc
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 41 12 13
emtencmn [women || ace |r| oe | | ey [S| es | eee [oS
maser § | 2 | % | 20 | m | 350 | a | 200 | o | as | s | 200 | 6 | 200 | oo | «50 | oo | 450 | oo | 200 | oo | soo | vo | 250 | se | 200 |
Comctesweriencescapscty | am] se | sco | se | sxe | oe | ssz0 | 7 | ao| os | r900{ mo | woo] a | oo] os | 10 | oo | r9m | oo | soo | se | 100 oo | 1360 se | 1100 |
peetrocoioay me] | 2m | ie | to | te | to | im | 240 | a | sc | om | 260 | sm | aa | mo | 300 | 2s | 205 | me | 200 | 25 | sso | ass | o55 | o6 | 200 |
a I a
a a EE EE
envronmentasusamabmy |S] | om | se | zm | w | am | o | 150 | oo | 2s | ov | 20 | ow | ao | so | 2% | re | sm | rm | sm | a7 | 205 | m | s70 | oo | 200 |
Sentinaiontouscattcoromy | tox | + | oso | x2 | cue | sas | sxe | a | reo | ico | om] a | 200 | zw | aw | too | sooo] soo | rom] a | zoo | ze | au | ss | sos | zo | 200 |
Nommalised Technical Score (Tn)
Total Fees (Pc) 30% 7,987 19,048 12,036 14,560 18,018 18,287 19,513 121,539 21,580 1,805 5,273
Price Score 164 159 145 134 118 117 111 102 102 101 42
Normalised Price Score (Pn) 100 97 89 82 72 71 68 62 62 62 oO
iWeighted Price Score (P
elements
OTHER DETAILS
Assesment panel member 1 Facility Officer, Planning and Infrastructure
Assesment panel member 2 Facility Officer, Planning and Infrastructure The Contract Administrator confirms the above weightings
Assesment panel member 3 A0Director, Planning and Infrastructure Contract Administrator's signature:
Assesment panel member 4
Page 7 of 32Section 8
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Page 8 of 32
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Final Evaluation
Weighted Attribute Evaluation Spreadsheet
ee ee
emcee |
No. |NAME OF TENDERER (excl of GS’ ff
1 [Ecovist hai ae no . ons ” var Oost Spoon
3 [Storm Intemational PtyLid The ratings:
4 +0 (zero) = Unacceptable — a fail for that criteria and extreme risk
5 [Total BuildingMaintenance = 20 (twenty) = Very Poor - the content of the submission for that criteria is of a low standard and high risk
6 + 40 (forty) = Poor — the content of the submission for that criteria is unimpressive and poses a moderate risk
7 + 60 (sixty) = Good - the content of the submis sion for that criteria is mertable and will need to be monitored if awarded
8 |House WithNoSteps(HWNS) + 80 (eighty) = Very Good - the content of the submission for that criteria is of a high standard and advantageous
9 [McCullough CleanngSerice Yt = 100 (one-hundred) = Exceptional — the content of the submission for that criteria is flawless / outstanding and most advantageous
10 |Achieve Corporate Services PtyLtd
11|SwampyCleanings—i—isis—‘s Once ail the data is entered the resultant scores based on the price and non price elements are automatically calculated for you
12 |CMBM Facility Services PtyLtd
13
NON-CONFORMING TENDERS Number of Tenders Evaluated = [13 ]
Pf notevaluate |
: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
— feo | eae fare es] me | oes, [eee |e, irc, |
meme mm |r] [P| [| [a [ae [er [a [er] [en] Se [er Se [eS [ee
ms © | 4° | eo | so | ss | 20 | oo | «so | mo | a0 | se | 20 | mo | 200 | oo | 200 | 4 | 20 | so | 20 | oo | 200 | se | 20 | oo | 200 |
Setneereceee © | 0 | 7 | uo | se | i160 | os | tooo] eo | sae | se | 160] s6 | 120 | 70 | 1400] o7 | sro | se | 1160 | se | s160| eo | tem | a0 | 1600 |
ey ee | es |e | veo | os [or | os | i275 | ro | toss | so | zo | se | ero | ov | ors | a7 | ros | os | ors | a7 | 705 | o6 | 200 | m4 | 11410 |
ene © | 3 | 0 | 250 | 00 | soo | so | 250 | 7 | ss | o | soo | so | sm | a | 200 | 4 | 20 | eo | so | 40 | 200 | 100 | so | oo | 300 |
mms | 32 | sv | ze | sz | 200 | so | 250 | m | a7 | w | oss | os | sm | os | 205 | oo | 150 | oo | soo | 22 | so | oe | a | mm | 320 |
Nomnalieed Technical Score (Th)
Total Fees (Pc) 30% 600 2,947 640 132 180 242 $8,389 $10,660 10,920 $15,000 16,700
Price Score 170 166 158 157 152 140 104 78 15 28 9
Normalised Price Score (Pn) 100 98 93 92 89 82 61 46 44 17 5
Weighted Price Score (Pw)
elements
OTHER DETAILS
Assesment panel member 1 Facility Officer, Planning and Infrastructure
Assesment panel member 2 Facility Officer, Planning and Infrastructure The Contract Administrator confirms the above weightings
Assesment panel member 3 AlDirector, Planning and Infrastructure Contract Administrator's signature: ————
Assesment panel member 4
Page 8 of 32Section 9
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
6 FURTHER REPORT - ALIGNMENT AMENDMENTS TO THE NOOSA PLAN 2006 -
PLANNING ACT 2016
Author Planning Scheme Project Manager – Raul Weychardt
Planning and Infrastructure
Index ECM/Subject/Draft Alignment Amendments
Attachments 1. Draft Alignment Amendments – The Noosa Plan - Additional Amendments
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Further Report is submitted to the General Committee as supplementary information to the
report entitled Draft Alignment Amendments to The Noosa Plan – Planning Act 2016 submitted to
the Planning & Environment Committee Meeting on 6 June 2017.
Staff have additionally identified inconsistencies regarding the level of assessment for Veterinary
uses in the Business Centre Zone, Neighbourhood Centre Zone and Village Mix Zone. The
planning intent was to make them subject to a code assessment application process, but the plan
provisions have a mix of requirements. This report therefore proposes an additional amendment
be included as part of the alignment amendments to overcome this unintended inconsistency in
respect to levels of assessment. Veterinary uses will become code assessment in the
aforementioned zones.
The additional amendments to accommodate the Veterinary uses are achieved by the deleting
the words “Type 1 or 2” after the words “Commercial business”. These are shown as tracked
changes in Attachment 1 to this Further Report and are recommended to form part of the
Alignment Amendments to The Noosa Plan.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the Report by the Planning Scheme Project Manager to the Planning &
Environment Committee Meeting dated 6 June 2017 and the Further Report to the General
Committee dated 12 June 2017 and
A. Prepare an alignment amendment to The Noosa Plan 2006 under the Alignment
Amendment Rules made by the Planning Minister under section 293 of the Planning Act
2016 and as set out in in track-change format in:
1. Attachment 1 of the Report to the Planning and Environment Committee dated 6
June 2017; and
2. Attachment 1 of the Further Report to the General Committee dated 12 June 2017;
B. Authorise the Chief Executive Officer to amend the alignment amendment in accordance
with the recommended changes included in the new Alignment Amendment Planning
Scheme Template (Version 4) released by the Department of Local Government,
Infrastructure and Planning dated 4 June 2017;
C. Commence the alignment amendment on 3 July 2017, coinciding with the commencement
of the Planning Act 2016;
D. Give notice of the alignment amendment by placing a public notice in a local Noosa
newspaper, government gazette and Noosa Council website; and
E. Provide the Chief Executive of the Department of Local Government, Infrastructure and
Planning a copy of the public notice and a copy of the alignment amendment.
Page 9 of 32
Section 10
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Previous Council Consideration
A report entitled the Draft Alignment Amendments to The Noosa Plan – Planning Act 2016 was
submitted to the Planning & Environment Committee on 6 June 2017.
Finance & Risk
Nil
Consultation
External Consultation - Community & Stakeholder
No external consultation occurred
Internal Consultation
The Development Assessment section was consulted with regard to the proposed alignment
amendments and the additional amendment outlined above.
Departments/Sections Consulted:
Chief Executive Officer Community Services Corporate Services
Executive Officer to the Mayor & CEO Community Facilities Financial Services
Executive Support Community Development ICT
Libraries & Galleries Procurement & Fleet
Local Laws Property & Facilities
Waste & Environmental Health Revenue Services
Executive Office X Planning & Infrastructure
Community Engagement Building & Plumbing Services
Customer Service Civil Operations
Economic Development Disaster Management
Governance Infrastructure Planning & Design
Human Resources X Planning & Environment
Sustainability Strategic Land Use Planning
Page 10 of 32
Section 11
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Attachment 1
Page 11 of 32
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Attachment 1
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3
Defined use or use
rol ei N
es
— >
oc si oO 5
w”
oe
Consistent use impact-assessable/mpact | ® g
No Agricultural Uses assessment = 8
All Agricultural Uses g
Inconsistent use
All Agricultural Uses
:BUSINESSIUSES==r02es Tiida enn bee ee I |
Consistent use Sel-assessableAccepted If sefLassessableaccepted
Commercial business | development subject to. development subject to_
Types-tor2 if not on requirements if one of the requirements Column 2 of Table
Lot 18 RP59216; following and not involving any 14.5, of the Business Uses Code
or new buildings or the expansion of
Entertainment & buildings or outdoor use area If code-assessablecode |
dining business Type | providing the building has already | assessment and—
1 Food & beverage or | been approved for one of these
Type 2 Recreation, uses and no additional tenancies | a) Home-based business—
amusement & fitness | are being created — i Business Uses Code; and
if not on Lot 18 a) Commercial business ii if involving building work—
RP59216; Types 1 or 2; or Column 2 of Table 14-44 —
or b) Entertainment and dining 14.45, of the Building
Entertainment & business Type 1; or Works Code
dining business Type | c) Retail business Types 1 or OR
3 Bar if located on Lot 2 2 if not exceeding 1,000m? b) otherwise—
RP839106 or Lot 1 GFA i Boreen Point, Kin Kin and
RP40395; Cootharaba Locality Code;
or Code-AssessableCode and |
Home-based business | assessment if— ii Business Uses Code; and
Type 1 Limited a) one of the following and not iii Landscaping Code; and
visibility or Type 2 involving any new buildings or iv Engineering Works Codes.
Evident; the expansion of buildings or
or outdoor use area but not
Retail business Type 1 complying with Column 2 of
Local, Type 2 Shop & Table 14.5, Acceptable
salon, Type 6 Solutions S1.1 to S9.2 of the
Hardware store, Type Business Uses Code—
7 Garden and lifestyle , Cc ial busi ;
centre if not on Lot 18 i) ee eee SINSSSs
RP59216; ote Alalidlaadd
or ii) Entertainment and
Retail business Type 5 dining business Type 1;
Vehicle uses if a or
service station and in ili) Retail business Types 1
Kin Kin or 2 not exceeding
1,000m* GFA;
Inconsistent uses b) one of the following, located
Those Business Uses in Kin Kin and involving any
listed in Section 4.156 new buildings or the |
expansion of buildings or
outdoor use area—
4-9
Page 11 of 32Section 12
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Page 12 of 32
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3
Defined use or use
ck PE teoia
8%
SS e
Dg
NS
S:
= |
® 2
— 3 i) Commercial business-
Ke g Types-1 or 2: jor
és ~ Lal Seeoal
Type3
iii) Entertainment and
dining business Types
1 or 2; or
| ivjiii) Home-based business
Types 1 or 2
| Viv) Industrial business
Type 1;
vijv) Retail business Type 1;
vidvi)Retail business Types
2 or 7 if not exceeding
1,000m? GFA
Impactassessable/mpact
assessment if in Kin Kin village
and—
a) Entertainment and dining
business Type 3; or
b) Home-based business
Type 3; or
c) Industrial business Types
2 or 3; or
d) Retail business Type 2
1,000m? GFA or more; or
e) Retail business Types 3, 4,
5,6 o0r7
tmpactassessable!/mpact
assessment if in Boreen Point
village and not otherwise se/-
assessableAccepted
development subject to
requirements or ¢ede-
assessablecode assessment —
All Business Uses
4-10
Page 12 of 32Section 13
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Page 13 of 32
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Division 6—Assessment table for the Business Centre Zone” te
Cem
Table 6.4 O22
ASSESSMENT CATEGORIES AND RELEVANT ASSESSMENT CRITERIACATEGORIES OF | ao "
3
DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT FOR THE BUSINESS CENTRE ZONE - MAKING A iS
MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE“ Os
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 3° §
Defined use or use =m 3
Poti es
ae = §
s
s
Consistent use impact-assessablelmpact |
No Agricultural Uses assessment
All Agricultural Uses
Inconsistent use
All Agricultural Uses |
BUSINESS; USES =e iiuzon ann dunner asset atv oe Ok nee cae US
Consistent use | Sel-assessableAccepted If se#-assessableaccepted |
All Commercial development subject to development subject to
| business; | requirements if one of the requirements Column 2 of Table
| or | following and not involving any 14.5, Acceptable Solutions $1.1 to
All Entertainment and | new buildings or the expansion of | S9.2 of the Business Uses Code
| dining business; | buildings or outdoor use area
| or providing the building has already | If sode-assessablecode |
| All Retail business | been approved for one of these assessment— |
| | uses and no additional tenancies | a) Cooroy & Lake Macdonald
Inconsistent use | are being created— Locality Code; and
Those Business Uses | a) Commercial business b) Business Uses Code; and
listed in Section 6.21 Types 1 or 2; or c) Landscaping Code; and
b) Entertainment and dining d) Engineering Works Codes.
business Type 1; or
| | c) Retail business Types 1 or 2 |
if not exceeding 2,000m* GFA
Code Assessable Code
| assessment -if—
a) one of the following and not
| involving any new buildings or
| | the expansion of buildings or
outdoor use area but not
| complying with Column 2 of
| | Table 14.5, Acceptable
Solutions $1.1 to S9.2 of the
| | Business Uses Code—
| i) _ Commercial business- _ |
® Assessment-categoriesCategories of development and assessment may also be affected by overlays. See overlaymaps |
(OM3.1- OM3.5) and the provisions of Part 13 to determine whether the land is affected. Also see Part 2 Section 2.6.4
explaining how the higher assessment categorycategory of development and assessment prevails. |
** For development other than material change of use refer assessment table 6.11 (Division 13)
*5 Refer to Part 2, Section 2.11 Dictionary for definitions
* Relevant-assessment eriteriaAssessment benchmarks are provided to assist with the preparation of an application and, in |
the case of impact assessable-assessmentdevelopment, in no way affect the regard to be given to the planning scheme as
a whole and other requirements in accordance with Section 3.5.5 of IPA
6-15
Page 13 of 32Section 14
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Page 14 of 32
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3
c = Defined use or use
R "| 25
OS fo At
3 z
‘ -
2
A
* §
S
<i
= | Types-t-or-2-:or
KR 3| ii) Entertainment and
| dining business; or
iii) Retail business Types |
1,4 0r 5; or
iv) Retail business Types
2, 6 or 7 if not exceeding |
2,000m* GFA
b) One of the following and
involving any new buildings or
the expansion of buildings or
outdoor use area—
i) Commercial business
where otherwise not se/f-
assessableAccepted
development subject to
requirements; or
ii) Entertainment and
dining business; or
iii) Retail business Types
1, 4 or 5; or |
iv) Retail business Types
2, 6 or 7 if not exceeding
2,000m* GFA
| lnpactassessable/mpact
assessment if—
a) Home-based business; or
| b) Industrial business; or
c) Retail business Types 2, 6
or 7 exceeding 2,000m? GFA;
or
d) Retail business Type 3
COMMUNITY USES— | sat iS
Consistent use Code assessableCode If code-assessablecode
Education Type 3 assessment -if— assessment—
Adult; or Type 4 a) Education Types 3 or 4; or a) Cooroy & Lake Macdonald
Information; b) Emergency Services; or Locality Code; and
or c) Wellbeing Type 2 b) |Community Uses Code; and
All Emergency c) Landscaping Code; and
services; or impactassessable/mpact d) Engineering Works Codes.
Wellbeing Type 2 assessment if— |
Social a) Education Types 1 or 2; or
b) Open space Types 1 or 2; or
Inconsistent use c) Wellbeing Types 1, 3 or 4
Those Community
Uses listed in Section
6-16
Page 14 of 32Section 15
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Page 15 of 32
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Kc
Defined use or use c Ss
29 N
class ir & >
4 Qo °
Oe
Oe
Oo
<2:
O 5
Fypes-tor2;; or | b 3
i) Commercial business- <s§
ii) Entertainment and -
dining business Type 1;
or
iii) Retail business Type 1;
or
iv) Retail business Types 2
or 7 if not exceeding
1,000m? GFA
b) one of the following and
involving any new buildings or
the expansion of buildings or
outdoor use area—
i) Commercial business
where not otherwise Se/t
assessableAccepted
development subject to
requirements; or
ii) Entertainment and
dining business Type 1;
or
iii) Retail business Type 1;
or
iv) Retail business Types 2
or 7 if not exceeding
1,000m* GFA
impactassessablelmpact |
assessment. if—
a) Entertainment and dining
business Type 2 or 3; or
b) Home-based business; or
c) Industrial business; or
d) Retail business Types 3, 4,
5 or 6 or Types 2 or 7 if
exceeding 1,000m* GFA
Consistent use Code-assessableCode If code-assessablecode |
Education Type 3 assessment if— assessment —
Adult or Type 4 a) Education Types 3 or 4; or a) Eastern Beaches Locality
Information; b) Wellbeing Type 2 Code; and
or b) Community Uses Code; and
Wellbeing Type 2 tmpactassessable!/mpact c) Landscaping Code; and |
Social assessment. if— d) Engineering Works Code
a) Education Types 1 or 2;
Inconsistent use b) Emergency service; or
7-17
Page 15 of 32Section 16
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Page 16 of 32
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
<5 Division 5—Assessment table for the Village Mix Zone”
N
© 3| Table 8.23
a ° ASSESSMENT CATEGORIES AND RELEVANT ASSESSMENT CRITERIA CATEGORIES OF
8 g DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT FOR THE VILLAGE MIX ZONE - MAKING A MATERIAL
Oe CHANGE OF USE”
Os Column 1 Column 2 Column 3
= g Defined use or use
g 2 Po eta 1
C
73
| Consistent use impactassessablelmpact
No Agricultural Uses assessment
All Agricultural Uses
Inconsistent use
All Agricultural Uses
BUSINESS USES =o aie sic miebaeee nines iN Ars al TI AE RA
Consistent use Self-assessableAccepted If selfLassessableaccepted
All Commercial development subject to development subject to
business; requirements if one of the requirements Column 2 of Table
or following and not involving any 14.5, Acceptable Solutions $1.1 to
Entertainment and new buildings or the expansion of | S9.2 of the Business Uses Code
dining business Type | buildings or outdoor use area
| 1 Food and beverages | providing the building has already | If code-assessablecode
or Type 2 Recreation, been approved for one of these assessment and—
amusement & fitness; | uses and no additional tenancies
or are being created— a) Home-based business—
Type 3 Bar if located on | a) Commercial business i Business Uses Code; and
Lot 1 RP68598, Types 1 or 2; or ii if involving building work—
Pomona; b) Entertainment and dining Column 2 of Table 14.44-
or business Type 1; or 14.45 of the Building
Home-based business | c) Retail business Types 1 or 2 Works Code; or
Type 1 Limited if not exceeding 1,000m? GFA
visibility or Type 2 b) otherwise—
| Evident; Cede AssessableCode i Mary River Catchment
or assessment. if— Locality Code; and
Industrial Business a) one of the following and not ii Business Uses Code; and
Type 1 Warehouse or involving any new buildings or iii Landscaping Code; and
Type 2 Production, the expansion of buildings or iv Engineering Works Codes.
alteration, outdoor use area but not
repackaging & complying with Column 2 of
repairing, where Table 14.5, Acceptable
located on the north- Solutions $1.1 to S9.2 of the
eastern side of Factory Business Uses Code—
| Street, Pomona or i . . .
i Commercial business
| ' Assessment sategoriesCategories of development and assessment may also be affected by overlays. See overlay maps
(OMS5.1- OMS.5) and the provisions of Part 13 to determine whether the land is affected. Also see Part 2 Section 2.6.4
| explaining how the higher assessment categorycategory of development and assessment prevails.
‘8 For development other than material change of use refer to assessment table 8.10 (Division 12)
'® Refer to Part 2, Section 2.11 Dictionary for definitions
| *° Relevant assessment criteria. benchmarks -are provided to assist with the preparation of an application and, in the case of
impact assessableimpact assessment development, in no way affect the regard to be given to the planning scheme as a
whole and other requirements in accordance with Section 3.5.5 of IPA
8-12
Page 16 of 32Section 17
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Page 17 of 32
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 N
Defined use or use a
rT a
class ti OS
Os
oO 2
Hz
98
O82
<2
ee , oe
within the village of Typestor2-or | of
Cooran; ii) Entertainment and KR 3
or . dining business Types s
— business Type 1 1 or 2: or
ocal or wes ‘
Type 2 Shop & salon, iii) pn business
where located on land ; yP . te
fronting Station Street, iv) Industrial business
the southern side of Type 1;
Memorial Avenue or the v) Retail business Type 1;
eastern side of Reserve or
Street, Pomona, or vi) Retail business Types 2
within the village of or 7 if not exceeding
pall 6 Hard 1,000m? GFA.
or Type 6 Hardware :
store; or Type 7 b) one : the ae oe
Garden and Lifestyle ENGI ING OTS HOW CLINGS OF
Centre the expansion of buildings or
outdoor use area—
Inconsistent use i) Commercial business
Those Business Uses where not otherwise Se/t
listed in Section 8.19 assessableAccepted
development subject to
requirements; or
ii) Entertainment and
dining business Types
1 or 2; or
iii) Home-based business
Types 1 or 2
iv) Industrial business
Type 1;
v) Retail business Type 1;
vi) Retail business Types 2
or 7 if not exceeding
1,000m? GFA.
tmpactassessablelmpact_
assessment if—
a) Entertainment and dining
business Type 3; or
b) Home-based business
Type 3; or
c) Industrial business Type 2
or 3; or
d) Retail business Type 2or7
exceeding 1,000m* GFA; or
e) Retail business Types 3, 4,
5 or6
8-13
Page 17 of 32Section 18
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Page 18 of 32
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3
nN
Defined use or cry) c 5
class Ds
ce) me 5
a;
% F
Os
Ss
<2:
® oa
i) Commercial business- ce
| Fypes-tor2;jor S 8
ii) Entertainment and =
dining business Types
1 or 2; or
iii) Retail business Type 1;
or
iv) Retail business Types 2
or 7 if not exceeding
1,000m? GFA
b) one of the following and
involving any new buildings or
the expansion of buildings or |
outdoor use area— |
i) Commercial business
where not otherwise se/f- |
assessableAccepted
development subject to |
requirements ; or |
ii) Entertainment and
} dining business Types
| | 1 or 2; or
| iii) Retail business Type 1;
or
iv) Retail business Types 2
or 7 if not exceeding
1,000m* GFA
impact assessablelmpact
| assessment. if—
a) Entertainment and dining
business Type 3; or
b) Home-based business; or
c) Industrial business; or
d) Retail business Types 3, 4, |
5 or 6, or Types 2 or 7 if
exceeding 1,000m* GFA [
COMMUNITY USES—
Consistent use Gede-assessableCode If code-assessablecode
Education Type 1 assessment if— assessment —
Childcare, Type 3 a) Education Type 4; or | a) Noosa Heads Locality Code;
Adult or Type 4 b) Wellbeing Type 2 and
Information; b) Community Uses Code; and
or impact assessablelmpact c) Landscaping Code; and
Wellbeing Type 2 assessment if— d) Engineering Works Codes.
Social a) Education Types 1, 2,or 3; | |
or | :
9-17
Page 18 of 32Section 19
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Page 19 of 32
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 ‘.
Defined use or use =
PE toa 5 8
Sa —s
Xs
De
Si
oe
<:
®
Consistent use | Impact. assessable/mpact | cs
No Agricultural Uses assessment g
| All Agricultural Uses ~
Inconsistent use
All Agricultural Uses | |
LBUSINESSIUSES=neatsiemiaiean tan EAE a RRO Sea SE
Consistent use Self-assessableAccepted If sel-assessableaccepted
All Commercial development subject to development subject to
business; | requirements if one of the requirements Column 2 of Table |
All Entertainment and | new buildings or the expansion of | S9.2 of the Business Uses Code
or following and not involving any 14.5, Acceptable Solutions S1.1 to
dining business; buildings or outdoor use area
or providing the building has already | If code-assessablecode
Retail business Type 1 | been approved for one of these assessment — |
Local, Type 2 Shop uses and no additional tenancies | a) Noosa Heads Locality Code;
and salon, Type 4 are being created— and
Showroom, Type 5 a) Commercial business b) Business Uses Code; and
Vehicle uses, Type 6 Types 1 or 2; or c) Landscaping Code; and
Hardware store or b) Entertainment and dining d) Engineering Works Codes.
Type 7 Garden and business Type 1; or
lifestyle centre. c) Retail business Types 1 or 2
Inconsistent use Code AssessableCode |
Those Business Uses | assessment if—
listed in Section 9.31 a) one of the following and not
involving any new buildings or
the expansion of buildings or
outdoor use area but not |
complying with Column 2 of
Table 14.5, Acceptable
Solutions $1.1 to S9.2 of the
Business Uses Code—
i) Commercial business
Types tor 2-;or
ii) Entertainment and
dining business; or
iii) Retail business Types
1,4, 5, 6 or 7; or |
iv) Retail business Type 2
if not exceeding 2,000m?
GFA |
* Refer to Part 2, Section 2.11 Dictionary for definitions
* Relevant assessment eriteria-benchmarks are provided to assist with the preparation of an application and, in the case of |
impact-assessablelmpact assessment development, in no way affect the regard to be given to the planning scheme as a
whole and other requirements in accordance with Section 3.5.5 of IPA
9-19
Page 19 of 32Section 20
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Page 20 of 32
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3
Defined use or use
class”
il
=
58
—
oe
Be
Types-+-or 2; 0r | a2
; Qe
i) Commercial business- Os
ii) Entertainment and Os
dining business Type 1; — 3
or 8
iii) Retail business Types 1
or 2 if not exceeding
1,000m? GFA
b) One of the following and |
involving any new buildings or
the expansion of buildings or
outdoor use area—
i) Commercial business
where not otherwise Sef
assessableAccepted
development subject to
requirements; or
ii) Entertainment and
dining business Type 1;
or
iii) Retail business Type 1;
or
iv) Retail business Types 2
or 7 if not exceeding
1,000m? GFA
impactassessable/mpact |
assessment if—
a) Entertainment and dining
business Type 3; or
b) Home-based business; or
c) Industrial business; or
d) Retail business Types 2, 3,
4, 5 or 6 or Types 2 or 7 if
exceeding 1,000m? GFA
Consistent use Code assessable Code If ceode-assessablecode |
Education Type 1 assessment if— assessment—
Childcare or Type 4 a) Education Type 4; or a) Noosaville Locality Code; and
Information; b) Wellbeing Type 2 b) Community Uses Code; and
or c) Landscaping Code; and
Wellbeing Type 2 impact assessablelmpact d) Engineering Works Codes. |
Social assessment if—
a) Education Types 1, 2 or 3;
Inconsistent use or
Those Community b) Emergency service; or
Uses listed in Section c) Open space; or
11-17
Page 20 of 32Section 21
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Page 21 of 32
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Division 8—Assessment table for the Business Centre
Zone®?
Table 11.6 be
& &
DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT FOR THE BUSINESS CENTRE ZONE - MAKING A a
MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE™ © 2
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3 Hz
Defined use or use Qe
tl Toh Oe
Kt = zg
@
Ee
£
Consistent use Impact.assessablelmpact |
No Agricultural Uses assessment
All Agricultural Uses
Inconsistent use
All Agricultural Uses
BUSINESS USES=>icie- sasaenMa MEM Na ena et eS ure eS ae
Consistent use Self-assessableAccepted If sef-assessableaccepted
All Commercial development subject to development subject to
business Types-t+-or2; | requirements if one of the requirements Column 2 of Table
or following and not involving any 14.5, Acceptable Solutions S1.1 to
All Entertainment and | new buildings or the expansion of | S9.2 of the Business Uses Code
dining business if not buildings or outdoor use area
located in the Mary providing the building has already | If code-assessablecode |
Street/Thomas Street been approved for one of these assessment—
Precinct; uses and no additional tenancies | a) Noosaville Locality Code; and
or are being created — b) Business Uses Code; and
All Retail business if a) Commercial business c) Landscaping Code; and
not located in the Mary Types 1 or 2; or d) Engineering Works Codes.
Street/Thomas Street b) Entertainment and dining
Precinct business Type 1 and not
located in the Mary
Inconsistent use Street/Thomas Street
Those Business Uses Precinct; or
listed in Section 11.33 c) Retail business Types 1 or 2
if not exceeding 2,000m? GFA
and not located in the Mary
Street/Thomas Street Precinct
Code-AssessableCode |
assessment if—
a) one of the following and not
involving any new buildings or
the expansion of buildings or
outdoor use area but not
3 Assessment categoriesCategories of development and assessment may also be affected by overlays. See overlaymaps |
(OMB8.1- OM8.5) and the provisions of Part 13 to determine whether the land is affected. Also see Part 2 Section 2.6.4
explaining how the higher assessment categorycategory of development and assessment prevails. |
*4 For development other than material change of use refer to assessment table 11.13 (Division 15)
* Refer to Part 2, Section 2.11 Dictionary for definition
*© Relevant assessment-_criteriabenchmarks are provided to assist with the preparation of an application and, in the case of |
impactassessableimpact assessment development, in no way affect the regard to be given to the planning scheme as a
whole and other requirements in accordance with Section 3.5.5 of IPA
11-19
Page 21 of 32Section 22
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Page 22 of 32
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Column 1 Column 2 Column 3
Defined use or use
Po teh
= Kf
Se
a=
=
S
D2
O2 , :
Os complying with Column 2 of
=<—°s Table 14.5, Acceptable
m & Solutions S1.1 to S9.2 of the
iS § Business Uses Code—
S
g i) Commercial business-
Fypes-t-or2-jor
ii) Entertainment and
dining business Type 1
| and not located in the
Mary Street/Thomas
Street Precinct; or
iii) Retail business Types 1
or 2 and not located in
the Mary Street/Thomas
Street Precinct; or
b) One of the following and
involving any new buildings or
the expansion of buildings or
outdoor use area—
i) Commercial business
where not otherwise Seff-
assessableAccepted
development subject to
requirements; or
ii) Entertainment and
dining business Types
1 or 2 if not located in the
Mary Street/Thomas
Street precinct; or
iii) Retail business Type 1,
4 or 5 if not located in the
Mary Street/Thomas
Street precinct; or
iv) Retail business Types 2
or 7 if not exceeding
2,000m? GFA and not
located in the Mary
Street/Thomas Street
precinct
| impact-assessable/mpact
assessment if—
a) Entertainment & Dining
business where located in
the Mary Street/Thomas
Street precinct; or
b) Entertainment & Dining
11-20
Page 22 of 32Section 23
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Page 23 of 32
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
N Column 1 Column 2 Column 3
c 8 | eine mtecemtcr
OS class”
oO = yet
Of
OQ x
<i
® ° Type 7 Garden and d) | Engineering Works Codes.
= ; lifestyle centre Code-AssessableCode
Ks assessment if—
= | Inconsistent use a) one of the following and not
Those Business Uses involving any new buildings or
listed in Section 12.23 the expansion of buildings or
outdoor use area but not
complying with Column 2 of
Table 14.5, Acceptable
Solutions $1.1 to S9.2 of the
Business Uses Code—
i) Commercial business
Types 1 or 2::0r
ii) Entertainment and dining
business Type 1; or
iii) Retail business Type 1;
or
iv) Retail business Type 2 if
not exceeding 1,000m?
GFA
b) One of the following and
involving any new buildings or
the expansion of buildings or
outdoor use area—
i) Commercial business
where not otherwise Se/#
assessableAccepted
development subject to
requirements; or
ii) Entertainment and dining
business Types 1 or 2; or
iii) Retail business Type 1;
or
iv) Retail business Type 2 if
not exceeding 1,000m?
GFA
| impactassessablelmpact
assessment if—
a) Entertainment and dining
business Type 3; or
b) Home-based business; or
c) Industrial business; or
d) Retail business Type 2
exceeding 1,000m* GFA; or
e) Retail business Types 3, 4,
5, 6 or 7.
12-14
Page 23 of 32Section 24
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Page 24 of 32
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
: Division 7—Assessment table for the Business Centre Zone”
Cas
x 3 Table 12.5
2 | ASSESSMENT CATEGORIES AND RELEVANT ASSESSMENT CRITERIACATEGORIES OF.
g 2 DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSMENT FOR THE BUSINESS CENTRE ZONE - MAKING A
oO: MATERIAL CHANGE OF USE”
Os Column 1 Column 2 Column 3
Pa £ Defined use or use
g > Po Feo Me
S
m3
| Consistent use impactassessable/mpact
No Agricultural Uses assessment
All Agricultural Uses
Inconsistent use
All Agricultural Uses
BUSINESS IUSES= ii ian aaa Waa nate amie: Mp SARNn Na | ne ON eR RNS
Consistent use Self-assessableAccepted If sefLassessableaccepted
All Commercial development subject to development subject to
business; requirements if one of the requirements Column 2 of Table
or following and not involving any 14.5, Acceptable Solutions $1.1 to
Entertainment and new buildings or the expansion of | S9.2 of the Business Uses Code
dining Type 1 Food & | buildings or outdoor use area
| beverage or Type 2 providing the building has already | If sode-assessablecode
Recreation, been approved for one of these assessment —
amusement & fitness; | uses and no additional tenancies | a) | Tewantin & Doonan Locality
or are being created — Code; and
Type 3 Bar where a) Commercial business b) Business Uses Code; and
located on Lot 1 on Types 1 or 2; or c) Landscaping Code; and
RP845244 or Lot 3 on b) Entertainment and dining d) | Engineering Works Codes.
RP40197, having business Type 1; or
frontage to Poinciana c) Retail business Types 1 or 2
Av, Diyan St or if not exceeding 2,000m? GFA
Blakesley St;
| or Code-AssessableCode
Retail business Type 1 | assessment if—
Local, Type 2 Shop & | a) one of the following and not
salon, Type 6 involving any new buildings or
Hardware store or the expansion of buildings or
Type 7 Garden and outdoor use area but not
lifestyle centre complying with Column 2 of
Table 14.5, Acceptable
Inconsistent use Solutions S1.1 to S9.2 of the
Those Business Uses Business Uses Code—
| Fypestor2-;or
listed in Section 12.27 ‘ ; ;
i) | Commercial business-
|= Assessment categoriesCategories of development and assessment may also be affected by overlays. See overlay maps
(OM9.1- OM9.5) and the provisions of Part 13 to determine whether the land is affected. Also see Part 2 Section 2.6.4
| explaining how the higher assessment categorycategory of development and assessment prevails.
7” For development other than material change of use refer to assessment table 12.11 (Division 13)
8 Refer to Part 2, Section 2.11 Dictionary for definitions
| *° Relevant assessment eriteriabenchmarks are provided to assist with the preparation of an application and, in the case of
impact assessableimpact assessment development, in no way affect the regard to be given to the planning scheme as a
whole and other requirements in accordance with Section 3.5.5 of [PA
12-16
Page 24 of 32Section 25
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
7 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE REPORT - MAY 2017
DOCUMENT INFORM AT ION
Author Director Corporate Services, Michael Shave
Corporate Services Department
Index ECM / Subject / 22.09 – Monthly Financial Performance Report
Attachments 1. Statement of Comprehensive Income
2. Statement of Financial Position
3. Statement of Cash Flows
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Council’s year to date (YTD) operating financial performance against budget is on track to
outperform the full year budget forecast, reflecting ongoing disciplined budget management by
staff and Council’s commitment to complying with its financial sustainability policy. Current
budget figures reflect the adjustments adopted by Council in the April meeting round.
YTD Financial Performance Summary to May 2017
Current YTD Actual Variance Variance Status
YTD $m $m YTD
Budget %
$m
Recurrent Revenue $86.8 $88.7 $1.9 2.3% On track
Recurrent Expense $77.5 $76.4 $1.0 1.3% On track
Net Capital Revenue $4.5 $10.2 $5.7 126.7% On track
Capital Expenditure $19.3 $12.8 $6.5 33.7% Watch
Financial statements including Statement of Comprehensive Income (profit & loss), Statement of
Financial Position (balance sheet), and Statement of Cash Flows are included as attachments for
information of Council.
Figure 1: Actual Performance Compared to YTD Budget
$100
$90
$80
$70
$60
$50
$40
$30
$20
$10
$-
YTD Budget ($m) YTD Actual ($m)
Operating Revenue Operating Expenditure
Page 25 of 32
Section 26
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
RECOMMENDATION
That Council note the report by the Director Corporate Services to the General Committee
Meeting dated 12 June 2017 providing the May YTD monthly financial performance report for the
2016/17 financial year.
REPORT
Operating Revenue (YTD Benchmark 91.7% - 11 months)
Council has realised 98% ($89 million) of its operating revenue budget of $90 million as at the
end of May 2017. Commentary on each revenue category is provided below:
Rates and Levies – $62.4m (100%) of the annual budget of $62.3m has been earned, with
general rates received for the year above budget by $59k.
Fees and Charges – Fees and charges earned ($5.2m) has exceeded the full year budget
($4.9m). Development related fees ($258k), local law infringements ($139k), land use
permit fees ($80k), change of property ownership fees ($65k) and property search fees
($31k) all currently exceed YTD budget ($4.6m).
Interest Received – Interest earned of $4m totals 91% of the full-year budget ($4.4m), with
interest on invested funds currently $207k ahead of YTD budget; and interest on rate
arrears $42k ahead of the YTD budget. It is expected that the positive variance against
YTD budget ($250k) will hold with interest on Council’s Unitywater investment to be
recognised in June.
Dividend and Tax – Dividends and tax equivalent payments from Unitywater are in line with
YTD budget.
Other Revenue – Other revenue earned ($10.3m) has exceeded the full year budget
($10m). Holiday park fees ($212k), Civil Operations recovery from capital works ($200k),
lease revenue ($151k), Noosa Aquatic Centre ($135k), waste landfill fees and recyclable
sales ($130k), The J ($48k), local laws SPER fees ($40k), Noosa Leisure Centre activities
($30k), are all above YTD budget ($9.3m).
Grants, Subsidies & Contributions –in line with YTD budget.
Figure 2: Operating Revenue Position by Type (Excluding Rates)
$12.0
YTD Budget ($m)
$10.0
YTD Actual ($m)
$8.0
$6.0
$4.0
$2.0
$0.0
Other
Grants
Fees
Dividend
Tax
Interest
Page 26 of 32
Section 27
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Operating Expenditure (YTD Benchmark 91.7% - 11 months)
Actual operating expenditure is currently 78% of full year budget. Detailed commentary for each
expenditure category appears below:
Employee Costs – Actuals of $25m against the YTD budget of $25.3m (variance of $273k)
equates to 87% of full year budget spend. This is primarily represented by a YTD under-
expenditure of the training allocation ($163k) and additional allocation of employee costs to
capital projects.
Materials and Services – $32.9m (81% of the full year budget) has been expended
compared to the YTD budget of $33.6m (variance of $681k). Year to date variances
primarily relate to contract services budgets, specifically under expenditure in waste
collection ($303k); libraries programs and collections ($118k), electricity costs ($114k); ICT
telecommunications ($105k); works operations ($96k), pest management ($84k), parks
($58k) and cemeteries ($52k) all behind YTD budget. Materials and services costs
associated with the clean-up from damage caused by ex-cyclone Debbie total $259k as at
the end of May 2017.
Finance Costs – bank merchant fees ($17k) and interest on QTC loans ($100k) are
currently behind YTD budget.
Depreciation Expense – in line with YTD budget.
Other Expenses – above YTD budget by $23k due to additional infringement notices
referred to SPER for collection (recovered once fines are collected).
Figure 3: Operating Expenditure Position by Type
$40
$35
YTD Budget ($m)
$30
YTD Actual ($m)
$25
$20
$15
$10
$5
$0
Finance Costs
Materials
Depreciation
Employees
Other
Capital Revenue
YTD capital revenue of $10.2m received includes $2.8m of cash contributions from developers,
contributed assets of $4.7m (new infrastructure assets provided as a condition of development),
together with $2.7m received as grant funding towards capital projects, including $1.3m
(Commonwealth Roads to Recovery funding for renewal road works), $200k (TIDS); $153k
(Natural Disaster Relief and Recovery); $303k (Rufous Street Digital Hub); $75k (Natural
Disaster Resilience Program – Flood studies and flood gauges); $275k (Bus Shelter Disability
Upgrade program); $288k (Cycle Network Program); $20k (Tait Duke Cottage refurbishment),
and $11k Road Safety Grant.
Page 27 of 32
Section 28
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Figure 4: Capital Revenue by Type
$5.0
$4.5 YTD Budget ($m)
$4.0
YTD Actual ($m)
$3.5
$3.0
$2.5
$2.0
$1.5
$1.0
$0.5
$0.0
Contributed assets
Cash contributions
Grants / subsidies
Capital Program
Actual capital expenditure (excluding commitments) is $12.8 million against the revised full-year
budget of $24.6 million. Committed expenditure totals a further $8.1 million bringing the total of
actual and committed funds to $20.9 million (85% of the total program). Capital program delivery
is being monitored through the internal Capital Works Executive team.
Figure 5: Capital Program Delivery Performance
$25
$20
$15
$10
$5
$0
YTD Budget ($m) YTD Actual / Committed ($m)
Capital works Capital works committed Other capital Other capital committed
Cash Management and Investment Performance
Council funds are currently invested in compliance with Council’s Investment Policy, with 67%
held in highly liquid investments (either held as cash or maturing within 7 days - minimum
required of 10%), and all counterparty thresholds within policy guidelines. Total cash on hand at
the end of April was $72.7 million. Included in this balance are funds held in trust and for
restricted purposes (unexpended levy and grant funds).
Page 28 of 32
Section 29
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Council’s investment portfolio is balanced across a number of agencies, as shown in the graph
on the right. The graph on the left shows the current risk profile using industry credit ratings.
Bendigo
A2 6%
A1 6% Suncorp
8% 8%
Westpac
8%
A1 + QTC
(QTC) 47%
47% NAB
A1 + 11%
(Other)
39% CBA
20%
Actual interest revenue for May was $153,035 with a weighted average yield of 2.39% against
the industry benchmark (Bloomberg AusBond Bank Bill Index) of 1.79%.
Previous Council Consideration
Nil
Finance & Risk
Finance – as above
Risk – Council’s strategic risk register includes a number of risks that could impact on ongoing
financial sustainability. Effective budget management and reporting is an important risk mitigation
tool.
Consultation
External Consultation - Community & Stakeholder
Nil.
Internal Consultation
All areas of Council are consulted as part of the regular monitoring of budget performance.
Departments/Sections Consulted:
x Chief Executive Officer x Community Services x Corporate Services
Executive Officer to the Mayor & CEO Community Facilities Financial Services
Executive Support Community Development ICT
Libraries & Galleries Procurement & Fleet
Local Laws Property & Facilities
Waste & Environmental Health Revenue Services
x Executive Office x Planning & Infrastructure
Community Engagement Building & Plumbing Services
Customer Service Civil Operations
Economic Development Infrastructure Planning & Design
Governance Planning & Environment
Human Resources Strategic Land Use Planning
Sustainability
Page 29 of 32
Section 30
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Attachment 1
Page 30 of 32
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Attachment 1
Noosa Council
Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the Year Ended 30 June 2017
As at 31 May 2017
Current Current
Budget Budget Actual Percentage
2017 YTD YTD Annual Budget
$ $ $ %
Revenue
Recurrent Revenue
Rates, levies and charges 62,319,194 62,319,194 62,398,364 100%
Fees and charges 4,884,237 4,610,393 5,165,122 106%
Dividend income 1,651,805 642,410 642,410 39%
Interest received 4,415,093 3,754,054 4,003,762 91%
Tax equivalents 1,489,834 1,055,623 1,055,623 71%
Sale of Goods and Major Services 7,937,430 7,355,221 7,846,432 99%
Sale of Contract & Recoverable Works 15,970 14,639 2,533 16%
Rental & Lease Income 1,260,843 1,170,149 1,291,960 102%
Other income 788,964 756,353 1,185,247 150%
Grants, subsidies, contributions and donations 5,645,142 5,100,525 5,152,833 91%
90,408,512 86,778,562 88,744,286 98%
Expenses
Recurrent Expenses
Employee benefits 28,798,222 25,299,654 25,026,490 87%
Materials and services 40,901,558 33,627,763 32,946,430 81%
Finance costs 2,583,584 2,368,285 2,250,861 87%
Depreciation and amortisation 17,445,216 16,080,265 16,102,057 92%
Other expenses 85,863 81,197 104,579 122%
89,814,444 77,457,164 76,430,416 85%
Operating Result 594,068 9,321,398 12,313,870
Capital Revenue
Capital contributions and donations 1,741,636 1,644,926 7,913,781 431%
Grants, subsidies, contributions and donations 4,788,731 2,824,515 2,716,698 57%
Other capital revenue - - -
Total Capital Revenue 6,530,367 4,469,441 10,230,479
Page 30 of 32Section 31
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Attachment 2
Page 31 of 32
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Attachment 2
Noosa Council
Statement of Financial Position
For the Year Ended 30 June 2017
As at 31 May 2017
Consolidated
2017 2017
Forecast YTD 2016
Note $ $ $
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents 48,418,426 69,354,553 52,586,475
Trade and other receivables 8,381,283 6,250,713 5,946,062
Inventories 156,000 142,274 156,056
Other current assets 468,000 1,088,525 2,628 892
57,423,709 76,836,065 61,317,486
Non Current Assets held for sale - - -
Total Current Assets 57,423,709 76,836,065 61,317,486
Non Current Assets
Trade and other receivables 49,217,517 49,217,517 49,217,517
Other non current Assets - - -
Investments 69,141,000 60,978,225 60,978,225
Investment property 4,150,000 4,150,000 4,150,000
Property, plant and equipment 935,214,467 906,942 387 906,665,451
Intangible assets 3,837,196 3,355,589 2,613,761
Total Non Current Assets 1,061,560,179 1,024,643,718 1,023,624,954
Total Assets 1,118,983,889 1,101,479,782 1,084,942,440
Current Liabilities
Trade and other payables 4,501,051 5,045,197 7,887,760
Borrowings 3,039,899 3,875,099 2,932,289
Provisions 4,393,935 4,324,992 4,328,513
Other 548,000 462,832 537 ,888
Total Current Liabilities 12,482,885 13,708,120 15,686,451
Non Current Liabilities
Trade and other payables - - -
Borrowings 35,005,279 31,284,251 35,186,158
Provisions 9,304,975 9,082,779 9,082,779
Total Non Current Liabilities 44,310,254 40,367,030 44,268,938
Total Liabilities 56,793,139 54,075,150 59,955,389
Net Community Assets 1,062,190,750 1,047,404,632 1,024,987,051
Community Equity
Asset Revaluation Surplus 46,961,218 24,518,021 24,518,021
Retained Surplus / (Defeciency) - - -
Shire Capital 1,015,229 532 1,000,469,031 987,372,510
Current Year Net Earnings - 22,417,580 13,096,521
Total Community Equity 1,062,190,750 1,047 ,404,632 1,024,987,051
Page 31 of 32Section 32
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Attachment 3
Page 32 of 32
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 12 JUNE 2017
Attachment 3
Noosa Council
Statement of Cash Flows
For the Year Ended 31 May 2017
Actual Actual
2017 2016
$'000 $'000
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Receipts from Customers 81,542,985 79,746,460
Payments to Suppliers and Employees (64,701,023) (61,299,477)
16,841,961 18,446,983
Receipts:
Investment and Interest Revenue Received 4,003,762 4,083,846
Rental Income 1,291,960 1,146,256
Non Capital Grants and Contributions 5,152,833 5,129,959
Income Tax Equivalent Received 1,055,623 985,937
Income from Equity Investments 642,410 847 366
Payments:
Borrowing Costs
Interest Expense (242,795) (305,837)
Net Cash Inflow/(Outflow) from Operating Activities 28,745,755 30,334,509
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Receipts:
Proceeds of Sale of Property, Plant and Equipment 249,167
Grants, Subsidies, Contributions and Donations 10,230,479 7,020,688
Payments:
Payments of Property, Plant and Equipment (16,485,907) (25,447,415)
Payments for Intangible Assets (1,010,849) (152,016)
Net Cash Inflow/(Outflow) from Investing Activities (7,017,110) (18,578,943)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Receipts:
Proceeds from Borrowings
Payments:
Repayment of Borrowings (4,967,163) (4,941,800)
Net Cash Inflow/(Outflow) from Financing Activities (4,967,163) (4,941,800)
Net Increase/(Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents held 16,761,482 6,813,767
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the beginning of the financial year 52,586,475 50,891,174
Cash and Cash Equivalents at the end of the financial year 69,347,957 57,704,940
Page 32 of 32