Skip to the record
Search everything, all in one place.

Council archive · source document

Item 9 Appendix H - Code Responses-1.1 · MCU22/0094

of 63

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Earthworks and Drainage
PO51                                                      AO51                                               ü    Compliant
Filling and excavation does not directly, indirectly or   Filling and excavation works are designed and           Please see the attached Appendix E: Civil
cumulatively                                              constructed to ensure overland flow and/or              Engineering Report.
cause adverse impacts external to the development         flooding is not worsened, impeded, or otherwise
site by –                                                 diverted to adversely affect other properties or
      (a) causing ponding of water on the site or         downstream environments.
          nearby land;
      (b) causing erosion or the transport of sediment
          off the site;
      (c) increasing flooding, which adversely affects
          the safety or use of any land upstream and
          downstream;
      (d) or adversely affecting the flow of water in
          any overland flow path.
Car Parking and Access
PO52                                                      AO52.1                                             ü    Performance Outcome
Pedestrian safety and convenience is not threatened       Car parking is not located forward of the front         The proposed development provides car
or reduced by additional vehicular driveways.             building line or front building setback and is          parking to the western side of the site. This is
                                                          screened from view from the street and does not         due to the shape of the allotment and the
                                                          to dominate the streetscape.                            proposed use being a Childcare Centre.
                                                                                                                  Providing car parking to the rear of the site
                                                                                                                  would place the play areas along the front of
                                                                                                                  the site where the children’s safety are
                                                                                                                  compromised.

                                                                                                                  Despite the location of the car parking not
                                                                                                                  being the rear of the site, the proposed
                                                                                                                  development will have no impact to the
                                                                                                                  pedestrian safety and convenience as the
                                                                                                                  vehicle access point provides clear sightline
                                                                                                                  with no obstructions that may block the
                                                                                                                  driver’s vision.
                                                          AO52.2                                             NA   Not Applicable
                                                          Provision is made for shared driveways to               The proposed development only involves one
                                                          minimise the number of driveways interrupting           use over one allotment. As such, shared
                                                          the flow of pedestrians along the footpath.             driveway is not proposed.

Used in these records

About this file

File size
472 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Item 9 Appendix H - Code Responses-1.1.pdf · 472 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.