Original source · versioned page text
2018-10-15 General Committee Agenda
Text sections have not been matched to the original PDF pages. Use the original document to check page numbers.
GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING AGENDA 15 OCTOBER 2018
Matters Raised Comments
Val Crescent is intended to service residents minimising the traffic impacts on Val Cr.
who live in the street only. The current width has been deemed suitable for the
Val Crescent should be widened to cater for development.
the additional traffic if the development is to
proceed.
The proposed 53 car parks is not sufficient to The car parking numbers proposed have been
cater for patients, staff, visitors and other independently peer reviewed.
people required to attend the facility.
Number 2 Val Crescent’s driveway is not The location of 2 Val Cr driveway and the impact of the
indicated on the developer’s plans. This development has been considered in the assessment of
driveway is within 10m of the proposed the development. The driveway is unlikely to be
driveway. impacted by vehicles entering and existing the proposed
development driveway in Val Crescent.
The increased traffic created by the
development will make Val Crescent more
dangerous given—
there are no footpaths for local residents or A footpath to the whole Val Cr frontage of the
for people who park in the street to access development must be constructed should the
the hospital; development be approved.
The proposed driveway to the development in Val Cr is
children ride bikes and scooters on the near the Goodchap St roundabout. minimising the traffic
street and the increased traffic will prevent impacts on Val Cr.
them from doing this safely.
The Val Crescent access is inappropriate and The applicant has demonstrated the Val Crescent
unsafe because of restricted sight lines and access is safe when a covenant is provided that restricts
the applicant’s information response is grossly vegetation and structures in the area which is required
inaccurate. for sightlines. An RPEQ has certified the sight lines
comply with the relevant standards.
The sight lines and other traffic related concerns raised
by the submitter are addressed in the body of this
report.
Additional rubbish collection adding to noise This has been addressed in the body of this report. It is
and stress levels likely 1 additional collection would be required. Plastic
low noise1100litre bins would be used which are
specifically designed for noise sensitive areas.
Collection times are during the day minimising impacts
on the surrounding area. This has been discussed
further in Section 3.3.1 of this report under the Waste
heading.
During construction
The development will create noise and disrupt Noise is unavoidable during any construction. Should
amenity during the construction phase. the development be approved a construction
The construction phase is an enormous impost management plan and other relevant documents would
on Val crescent over a substantial period of be required as part of the operational works application
time and one we should not have to tolerate. and therefore construction impacts would be minimised.
Excavation for the basement raises stability Should the development be approved, conditions would
concerns and will probably result in pumps address the stability of the site during construction.
working all the time and over-taxing the storm
water drainage system and adding to sediment
levels in Lake Doonella.
Page 15 of 55
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalLog in to download the original file
Large file: the download may take up to a minute.
Searchable page text hides email addresses. Original files are unchanged and may show email addresses.