Meeting minutes

GENERAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES                                                     17 JUNE 2024


           c. The proposal disrupts the landscaped streetscape treatment required to Hofmann
              Drive intended to enhance the amenity and contribute positively to the centre’s
              character.
           d. The proposed use is an inconsistent use in the Major Centre Zone Code – Business
              Park Precinct will not deliver the commercial and employment uses intended for the
              Precinct such as health and wellbeing, education, research and technology and
              knowledge-based industries.
           e. The bio retention basin at the front of the site is located within the required setback
              area and in front of the proposed carparking area which results in the development
              being more visible to the road and not located in a park like
              setting.

      5. The proposal is not consistent with overall outcome 2(a), (d) and performance outcome
         PO8 of the Sustainable Building Design Code as the development does not provide a
         minimum              floor           to           ceiling           height          of
         2.7m.

      6. The proposed bicycle parking is not consistent with acceptable outcomes AO6.1 of the
         Driveways and Parking Code as they are located in an area that impedes access around
         the site.
   B. Note the report is provided in accordance with Section 63(5) of the Planning Act 2016.
   C. Request staff to undertake action to ensure the landscaping across the frontage of the site
   is consistent with development approvals RAL18/0023 and OPW20/0145.
   For:        Crs Wilson, Wilkie, Finzel, Wegener and Stockwell
   Against: Crs Lorentson and Phillips
   Carried.




    5.4.        FURTHER REPORT - MCU21/0110 - APPLICATION FOR MATERIAL
                CHANGE OF USE - RESORT COMPLEX AND ANCILLARY BAR, FOOD AND
                DRINK OUTLET, OUTDOOR SPORT AND RECREATION, AND CLUB
                (MINOR EXTENSION TO EXISTING CLUBHOUSE) AT 61 NOOSA SPRINGS
                DRIVE, NOOSA HEADS

                In accordance with Chapter 5B of the Local Government Act 2009, Cr Finzel
                provided the following declaration to the meeting of a declarable conflict of
                interest in this matter:
                I, Cr Finzel, inform the meeting that I have a declarable conflict of interest in this
                matter as I have come to understand that JFP Urban Consultants on behalf of
                Altum Property Group, who are the Developers of Park Ridge Noosa Springs,
                made a submission against the Noosa Springs Hotel Development. Since then,
                the matter has changed give Altum Property Group has withdrawn the
                submission. Leigh McCready, who is associated with Altum, was involved as a
                volunteer with my 2020 election campaign with Future Noosa which is no longer
                an entity. Although I have a declarable conflict of interest, I do not believe a
                reasonable person could have a perception of bias because I believe I do not have
                a close personal relationship with Leigh & Rob McCready. Therefore, I will choose
                to remain in the meeting room. However, I will respect the decision of the meeting
                on whether I can remain and participate in the decision.