Skip to the record
The first. The best. The only NoosaWatch™.

Council archive · source document

Cover Letter_17-12-2019_FINAL · 132005.1133.13

of 11

Text shows just the words. Original shows the document exactly as it was published.

Check the original when the exact wording matters.

        There is a separate development approval over the adjacent Precinct E2 for a Multiple Dwelling (Type 4 Conventional
        – 29 Units) – Council Ref: MCU15/0109.01, with the most recent modification to this approval issued by Council on
        5 March, 2019 (refer MCU15/0109.03).

        Precinct F and E2 have been developed in an integrated matter to allow for internal road and pathway connections
        between the two sites. We note that Council has issued a Development Permit for Reconfiguration of a Lot (to
        facilitate the creation of up to 26 balance lots across both Precinct F and Precinct E2) which further reinforces the
        staged and integrated manner within which these development approvals will be delivered (Council Ref.
        REC17/0022).

        2.0         DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CHANGES

        We request amendments to Conditions 2, 5, 33 and 83.

        Condition 2

        We request that condition 2 removes the “as annotated by Council” wording from the table of the listed approved
        plans and retains the clean copy of the Facilities Building Level 1 – Floor Plan prepared by Blackburne Jackson Design,
        as all noise control and management measures for the building have been detailed within the Noise Impact
        Assessment and Noise Management Plan.

        Condition 5

        Council imposed an additional condition on the latest Change Application approval (reference no.
        132005.1133.10), as outlined below: ‐
        5.         Carparking shall be provided within the site generally as shown on the approved plans. Carparking shall include
                   a minimum of:
                   a.    For the Multiple Dwelling Unit component:
                         i.     224 covered spaces;
                         ii.    17 uncovered spaces; and
                         iii.   35 uncovered spaces to be located within the common property, designated as visitor parking and
                                accessible at all times.
                   b.    For the Resort Facilities Building component:
                         i.     41 uncovered spaces are to be located within the common property and accessible at all times,
                                including 5 to be designated as staff parking.
                         ii.    All 41 spaces are to be provided within proximity of the Resort Facilities Building, that is, not located
                                along the proposed new road along the eastern property boundary.
                         iii.   All 41 spaces are to be fully constructed and available for use prior to the commencement of the
                                use of the Resort Facilities Building.
        It is considered that point (b) (i) to (iii) of condition 5 is unreasonable, given the below: ‐
               The additional imposition outlining 41 commercial spaces and locational restrictions within condition 5 is
                 unreasonable, given the imposition is for an aspect which was previously omitted by Council.



JFP Ref: M2652/F                                                                                                           Page 2

Used in these records

About this file

File size
357 KB (small file)
File type
PDF

No other editions are linked here.

Original file

Log in to download the original file

Cover Letter_17-12-2019_FINAL.pdf · 357 KB (small file)

The supporting record

Open full page ↗

Source document

Analyse documents ↗Open full page ↗

My Comparisons

Choose two to four records of the same kind. Drag using a handle or use the “Compare” buttons.

Your selected records are saved in this browser for your account. Results use the filters on the page where you choose “Compare selected”.