Council archive · source document
Cover Letter_17-12-2019_FINAL · 132005.1133.13
There is a separate development approval over the adjacent Precinct E2 for a Multiple Dwelling (Type 4 Conventional
– 29 Units) – Council Ref: MCU15/0109.01, with the most recent modification to this approval issued by Council on
5 March, 2019 (refer MCU15/0109.03).
Precinct F and E2 have been developed in an integrated matter to allow for internal road and pathway connections
between the two sites. We note that Council has issued a Development Permit for Reconfiguration of a Lot (to
facilitate the creation of up to 26 balance lots across both Precinct F and Precinct E2) which further reinforces the
staged and integrated manner within which these development approvals will be delivered (Council Ref.
REC17/0022).
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CHANGES
We request amendments to Conditions 2, 5, 33 and 83.
Condition 2
We request that condition 2 removes the “as annotated by Council” wording from the table of the listed approved
plans and retains the clean copy of the Facilities Building Level 1 – Floor Plan prepared by Blackburne Jackson Design,
as all noise control and management measures for the building have been detailed within the Noise Impact
Assessment and Noise Management Plan.
Condition 5
Council imposed an additional condition on the latest Change Application approval (reference no.
132005.1133.10), as outlined below: ‐
5. Carparking shall be provided within the site generally as shown on the approved plans. Carparking shall include
a minimum of:
a. For the Multiple Dwelling Unit component:
i. 224 covered spaces;
ii. 17 uncovered spaces; and
iii. 35 uncovered spaces to be located within the common property, designated as visitor parking and
accessible at all times.
b. For the Resort Facilities Building component:
i. 41 uncovered spaces are to be located within the common property and accessible at all times,
including 5 to be designated as staff parking.
ii. All 41 spaces are to be provided within proximity of the Resort Facilities Building, that is, not located
along the proposed new road along the eastern property boundary.
iii. All 41 spaces are to be fully constructed and available for use prior to the commencement of the
use of the Resort Facilities Building.
It is considered that point (b) (i) to (iii) of condition 5 is unreasonable, given the below: ‐
The additional imposition outlining 41 commercial spaces and locational restrictions within condition 5 is
unreasonable, given the imposition is for an aspect which was previously omitted by Council.
JFP Ref: M2652/F Page 2
See the original
The page text is free to read. Viewing or downloading an original file needs an account.
Log in to see the originalUsed in these records
Cover Letter_17-12-2019_FINAL.pdfRelated documentApplication case desk ↗
About this file
- File size
- 357 KB (small file)
- File type
No other editions are linked here.